Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuFumiko struggles to get her literary work published, spending years working in poverty while being abused by her boyfriend all the while hoping to break free from the cycle.Fumiko struggles to get her literary work published, spending years working in poverty while being abused by her boyfriend all the while hoping to break free from the cycle.Fumiko struggles to get her literary work published, spending years working in poverty while being abused by her boyfriend all the while hoping to break free from the cycle.
Empfohlene Bewertungen
Sometimes films turn out better than the books on which they are based, and sometimes they are even more literary or more adventurous. Then again, in many cases they aren't. Naruse had a good streak of successful adaptations of Hayashi Fumiko works, but this one falls short of the others. Naruse's previous Hayashi adaptations somehow find a poetics within the boredom, frustration, and regrets of marriage, but it doesn't happen here. This is odd considering that Hayashi's "Horoki" is already quite poetic. Takamine's offscreen readings somehow come off wrong and she is constantly overacting. This is strangely out of character for her and Naruse, who were known for their restraint and control. The film ends up as a grab-bag of documentary episodes from Hayashi's life, but the book is much more. Meh.
I've seen four films (None on DVD) of Hideko Takamine, three with director Mikio Naruse, and She certainly must have been one of the dominate Star's of Japanese film in her age. Going by the IMDb, She started in silent film in 29 and then did roughly a movie a year before retiring in 79.
Houroki-ki is a good film with a masterful performance from Takamine, She curls her body in a sensual pout whenever sizing up the situation, determined to rise above it even as She feigns not caring. Naruse's work is steady and intelligent and here the film never quite falls into "soap opera", as some of Takamine's vehicles seemed too.
I really recommend this one and "The Four Chimneys;" it's about time more
was known in the West of the impressive Ms. Takamine.
Houroki-ki is a good film with a masterful performance from Takamine, She curls her body in a sensual pout whenever sizing up the situation, determined to rise above it even as She feigns not caring. Naruse's work is steady and intelligent and here the film never quite falls into "soap opera", as some of Takamine's vehicles seemed too.
I really recommend this one and "The Four Chimneys;" it's about time more
was known in the West of the impressive Ms. Takamine.
How is it possible that Hideko Takamine can transform herself into this character so easily? My answer is that she was, 100%, an actress of heart. (Unlike so many Japanese actors and actresses these days who can only make faces.) And she does great things with her heart. She was by far one of the most talented actresses in the 20th century not only in Japan but anywhere. After playing several of Fumiko Hayashi's characters, Deko-Chan plays Fumiko Hayashi herself in Hourou-ki. And it is amazing to watch. From the beginning of the movie there is a deep sadness on Fumiko's face; and even when she is expressing other emotions in the movie, that sadness is still there in her face — it never goes away. Wow. I think that unlike most actors and actresses Hidoko Takamine can completely transform herself into her character; erase herself completely
It's the story of the early life of Fumiko Hayashi: her penniless upbringing, her desperate poverty in her young adulthood, her awful choice in men, and ultimately the beginning of her success as a writer.
Mikio Naruse's sixth and final movie based on Miss Hayashi's works -- including the revered MESHED and my personal favorite, INAZUMA -- is a story of tragedy from the beginning to the end. The choice to play the writer, Hideko Takamine, seems an odd choice, but she makes herself unattractive and utterly believable. Likewise, Kinuyo Tanaka seems older and more futile than in anything I've ever seen her in.
It's clearly an important movie, released to celebrate Toho's thirtieth anniversary as a production company. He directs it as one of those endless tales of Tokyo poverty that he and other socially conscious directors supervised in the 1930s, combined with the story of a woman mistreated by Japan's misogynistic society that Naruse so often offered.
I found it a tough watch; not only is it difficult to see a movie about a poet in another language -- although the rhythms of the translation in the version I watched were excellent -- but the unending misery, accurate to Miss Hayashi's life and written story though it may be, was hard to watch befalling my favorite Japanese actress. Don't mistake me: it's a great movie. But it's not one I'm likely to visit again soon.
Mikio Naruse's sixth and final movie based on Miss Hayashi's works -- including the revered MESHED and my personal favorite, INAZUMA -- is a story of tragedy from the beginning to the end. The choice to play the writer, Hideko Takamine, seems an odd choice, but she makes herself unattractive and utterly believable. Likewise, Kinuyo Tanaka seems older and more futile than in anything I've ever seen her in.
It's clearly an important movie, released to celebrate Toho's thirtieth anniversary as a production company. He directs it as one of those endless tales of Tokyo poverty that he and other socially conscious directors supervised in the 1930s, combined with the story of a woman mistreated by Japan's misogynistic society that Naruse so often offered.
I found it a tough watch; not only is it difficult to see a movie about a poet in another language -- although the rhythms of the translation in the version I watched were excellent -- but the unending misery, accurate to Miss Hayashi's life and written story though it may be, was hard to watch befalling my favorite Japanese actress. Don't mistake me: it's a great movie. But it's not one I'm likely to visit again soon.
Hourou-ki (1962) was shown at the Gene Siskel Film Center in Chicago with the title Her Lonely Lane. The film was co-produced and directed by Mikio Naruse, and is based on an autobiography written by Fumiko Hayashi. The film stars Hideko Takamine as Fumiko Hayashi.
This is the first Naruse film I've seen, and I feel as if I'm starting at the end of a cycle rather than at the beginning. Naruse had adapted several books by Hayashi for the screen, and this was the last. In the same way, Takamine was one of the director's favorite female actors, who had worked with him on several previous films. Under those circumstances, I can only give a general review of the film--I wish I could have seen it in sequence after having seen some of the others.
As a director, Naruse reminds me of Ozu. The movie is quiet, and the camera work is unobtrusive. The film is very sad. As portrayed in the movie, Hayashi's childhood and young adulthood were spent in bitter poverty. This is shown as something far beyond low income--Hayashi often doesn't have enough to eat, and has to take a succession of low-end jobs just to have enough money to pay for her meals and to send funds to her equally impoverished parents.
It's interesting that the film--and presumably the book--doesn't portray the protagonist as a saint. Hayashi not only makes bad choices, especially in men, but she commits a truly unethical act in order to advance her own literary career.
Even at the end, when the older Hayashi is wealthy and famous, she is scarred by the life she left behind. Rather than being portrayed as a kind, benevolent mentor, she is shown as shrewd, bitter, and self-serving.
I enjoyed this film, but I struggled somewhat with cultural differences about which I was uncertain, and subtitles which I suspect didn't do justice to the dialog. Even so, it was a privilege to be able to see this rare film and to learn of a new (for me) and highly talented Japanese director.
This is the first Naruse film I've seen, and I feel as if I'm starting at the end of a cycle rather than at the beginning. Naruse had adapted several books by Hayashi for the screen, and this was the last. In the same way, Takamine was one of the director's favorite female actors, who had worked with him on several previous films. Under those circumstances, I can only give a general review of the film--I wish I could have seen it in sequence after having seen some of the others.
As a director, Naruse reminds me of Ozu. The movie is quiet, and the camera work is unobtrusive. The film is very sad. As portrayed in the movie, Hayashi's childhood and young adulthood were spent in bitter poverty. This is shown as something far beyond low income--Hayashi often doesn't have enough to eat, and has to take a succession of low-end jobs just to have enough money to pay for her meals and to send funds to her equally impoverished parents.
It's interesting that the film--and presumably the book--doesn't portray the protagonist as a saint. Hayashi not only makes bad choices, especially in men, but she commits a truly unethical act in order to advance her own literary career.
Even at the end, when the older Hayashi is wealthy and famous, she is scarred by the life she left behind. Rather than being portrayed as a kind, benevolent mentor, she is shown as shrewd, bitter, and self-serving.
I enjoyed this film, but I struggled somewhat with cultural differences about which I was uncertain, and subtitles which I suspect didn't do justice to the dialog. Even so, it was a privilege to be able to see this rare film and to learn of a new (for me) and highly talented Japanese director.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesThe film was made as part of Toho's 30th anniversary, being one of five big budget banner releases that included, Kurosawa's Sanjuro, Inagaki's Chushingura, Honda's original King Kong vs. Godzilla, and Chiba's Born in Sin.
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
Details
- Laufzeit2 Stunden 3 Minuten
- Farbe
- Sound-Mix
- Seitenverhältnis
- 2.35 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen