Dr. Crippen

A compact, modestly budgeted movie that looks perfectly at home on home video (which is how I saw it). "Dr. Crippen" boasts flavorful performances by Donald Pleasence as the not-so-good doctor, Coral Browne as the long-suffering as well as insufferable Belle, and a pre-"Collector" Samantha Eggar as Ethel Le Neve, every unhappily married middle-aged man's fantasy. Casting the British-born Pleasence and Australian native Browne as the American Crippens hardly seems to matter. Eggar may have been too beautiful to play Le Neve (who, judging from photographs, was still a darkly attractive young woman). The movie is, perhaps, too economical; although we do get to see Crippen and Le Neve disguised as father and son for their ill-fated ocean voyage, I wished other colorful details of the case had also been re-created, such as Crippen's recklessly escorting Le Neve to a charity ball shortly after his wife's disappearance. As for the movie's suggestion that Crippen wasn't truly guilty of premeditated murder, my reply is: perhaps - but that doesn't really explain why Crippen cut up his wife's body and buried the pieces in the coal cellar.

The real Ethel Le Neve was still alive when this film was first released (she died in 1967). One wonders if she saw it. One wonders what she thought if she had.

This wasn't anything like I was expecting. Truth be told, I was more than pleasantly surprised by this story of the notorious and nefarious wife killer. However, nefarious may not be the correct description as this story recounts.

There's not much I can tell you about the story without giving you any spoilers, which I am always loathed to do. I can say the story starts at Dr Crippen and Ethel Le Neve, Crippen's mistress. as they stand accused of his wife's murder. From this point, the story is told in flashback and by witness testimonies in the trial. This story paints a different picture of the events and situations leading up to Belle Elmore's death.

Writer, Leigh Vance, gives the audience an interesting and thought-provoking tale of a marriage on the rocks. This is a total contrast to the sensationalism which ran in the papers and which turned this man into a nightmare myth - nearly on par with Jack the Ripper, as Crippen mentions towards the end of the film. Though the direction isn't too elaborate, the director, Robert Lynn keeps the shots classy and the pace smooth, which adds power to this style of drama.

Along with the story, the actors are the other driving force keeping the viewers viewing. Donald Pleasance (who is one of my favourite actors of all-time) gives a sublime performance as the mousey Dr Crippen. Along with the shrew-like performance of Coral Browne as Belle Elmore, you can almost feel the palpable tension of their relationship. Then you have his mistress, Ethel Le Neve, who is played with a quiet calmness by Samantha Eggar.

This was a crime that caused a commotion and perturbation when it ran in the papers. Therefore, If true crime is your thing I would recommend you to give this story a try. If you're a fan of dramas then this could also be for you. I'd also encourage any film buff to watch this movie.

Brits complain about Americans stealing our inventions, yet we've been quite happy to claim two Americans, a quack doctor and a failed burlesque singer for our own. Casting 'Donald Pleasence'(qv) as the Doctor and Anglicised Aussie 'Coral Browne' (qv) as his insufferable wife not only seemed right but produced wonderfully atmospheric performances. I've only seen a TV version so it may be TV editing rather than the low budget that missed out, for example, Ethel wearing Mrs Crippens furs & jewellery to events. It would have helped see why the Doctor fell under suspicion. Made at a time when abolishing capital punishment and miscarriages of justices were under discussion in the UK it is not surprising the film suggests that the murder wasn't premeditated. In the light of his subsequent actions, you can decide yourself.

The real `other woman' Ethel Le Neve, changed her name and died in Dulwich, SE London, in 1967 aged 89. If she saw this movie what did she think?

Historical accuracies aside, a first class cast and adequate directions provide an interesting diversion for the duration of this film.

The film, especially in B&W, has a claustrophobic feel of foreboding.

That being said, there are some inaccuracies, a major one being that Crippen and his wife were Americans, and there's zero trace of that in Coral Brown's accent not detectably in Pleasance's. Pleasance was absolutely a wonderful actor, but his ability to do an American accent was never good (see his Dr. Loomis in Halloween) and I'm wondering whether that had something to do with his not bothering trying.

As a piece of acting, certainly nothing bad and imminently watchable.

Despite the overwhelming evidence supporting the murder of Mrs. Crippen there has to be a question of intent. Whilst the film gives what seemingly is an accurate portrayal of the crime it seems to be biased towards the like of Filson Young who perceived Mrs Crippen as a wanton woman. The portrayal of the state of the house is accurate according to the reports in the papers though the over acting by the captain of the montrose and the failure of pleasance to grow a beard whilst evading the long arm of the law indicates poetic licence. Anyone who hasn't studied the background to the case will find it an OK watch but there are too many inaccuracies to the academics!