[go: up one dir, main page]

    Kalender veröffentlichenDie Top 250 FilmeDie beliebtesten FilmeFilme nach Genre durchsuchenBeste KinokasseSpielzeiten und TicketsNachrichten aus dem FilmFilm im Rampenlicht Indiens
    Was läuft im Fernsehen und was kann ich streamen?Die Top 250 TV-SerienBeliebteste TV-SerienSerien nach Genre durchsuchenNachrichten im Fernsehen
    Was gibt es zu sehenAktuelle TrailerIMDb OriginalsIMDb-AuswahlIMDb SpotlightLeitfaden für FamilienunterhaltungIMDb-Podcasts
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAlle Ereignisse
    Heute geborenDie beliebtesten PromisPromi-News
    HilfecenterBereich für BeitragendeUmfragen
Für Branchenprofis
  • Sprache
  • Vollständig unterstützt
  • English (United States)
    Teilweise unterstützt
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Anmelden
  • Vollständig unterstützt
  • English (United States)
    Teilweise unterstützt
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
App verwenden
  • Besetzung und Crew-Mitglieder
  • Benutzerrezensionen
  • Wissenswertes
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

The Sinister Urge

  • 1960
  • Not Rated
  • 1 Std. 11 Min.
IMDb-BEWERTUNG
2,6/10
1766
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Dino Fantini in The Sinister Urge (1960)
A flunky for a porno movie ring starts murdering the smut films' lead actresses.
trailer wiedergeben2:54
1 Video
5 Fotos
DramaEntsetzenKriminalitätThriller

Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuA flunky for a porno movie ring starts murdering the smut films' lead actresses.A flunky for a porno movie ring starts murdering the smut films' lead actresses.A flunky for a porno movie ring starts murdering the smut films' lead actresses.

  • Regie
    • Edward D. Wood Jr.
  • Drehbuch
    • Edward D. Wood Jr.
  • Hauptbesetzung
    • Kenne Duncan
    • Duke Moore
    • Jean Fontaine
  • Siehe Produktionsinformationen bei IMDbPro
  • IMDb-BEWERTUNG
    2,6/10
    1766
    IHRE BEWERTUNG
    • Regie
      • Edward D. Wood Jr.
    • Drehbuch
      • Edward D. Wood Jr.
    • Hauptbesetzung
      • Kenne Duncan
      • Duke Moore
      • Jean Fontaine
    • 33Benutzerrezensionen
    • 24Kritische Rezensionen
  • Siehe Produktionsinformationen bei IMDbPro
  • Videos1

    Trailer
    Trailer 2:54
    Trailer

    Fotos4

    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen

    Topbesetzung39

    Ändern
    Kenne Duncan
    Kenne Duncan
    • Lt. Matt Carson
    Duke Moore
    • Sgt. Randy Stone
    • (as James 'Duke' Moore)
    Jean Fontaine
    • Gloria Henderson
    Carl Anthony
    • Johnny Ryde
    Dino Fantini
    • Dirk Williams
    Jeanne Willardson
    • Mary Smith
    Harvey B. Dunn
    • Mr. Romaine
    Reed Howes
    Reed Howes
    • Police Inspector
    Fred Mason
    • Officer Kline
    Vic McGee
    • Syndicate man
    Harry Keaton
    Harry Keaton
    • Jaffe
    • (as Harry Keatan)
    Conrad Brooks
    Conrad Brooks
    • Connie
    Vickie Baker
    • Kid at Diner
    • (Nicht genannt)
    Jean Baree
    • Policeman
    • (Nicht genannt)
    Henry Bederski
    • Kid at Diner
    • (Nicht genannt)
    Honey Bee
    • Kid at Diner
    • (Nicht genannt)
    Judy Berares
    • Frances
    • (Nicht genannt)
    Betty Boatner
    • Shirley
    • (Nicht genannt)
    • Regie
      • Edward D. Wood Jr.
    • Drehbuch
      • Edward D. Wood Jr.
    • Komplette Besetzung und alle Crew-Mitglieder
    • Produktion, Einspielergebnisse & mehr bei IMDbPro

    Benutzerrezensionen33

    2,61.7K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Empfohlene Bewertungen

    dgalloway

    Ed Wood, though art a genius...

    This movie is so unintentionally funny, like all Ed Wood movies. It's not on the same level as Plan 9 from Outer Space, but it comes mighty darn close. Not only that, but MST3K riffed it, as well. That raises the humor level about a hundred points. I recommend it to anyone with a love for bad movies.
    InzyWimzy

    Smuttily yours

    I really think smut gets a bad rep. This Ed Wood schlocker attempts to correlate the smut racket and the ills of society's problems. Well, at least back in 1961. Of course, this isn't shown so well and Ed delivers his usual bland scenes of dialogue where the characters are trying to further progress the story. Or were they trading borscht pie recipes? Well this all adds up to a movie that seems like a 10 hour skin grafting session.

    Is it bad? Of course, no question. Or was it made out to be that way? After seeing Ed Wood's works, it looks like his actors are giving serious, genuine performances, but there's a sense that they're having fun with it (that is until Ed explained how he was going to pay them). Characters galore range from crazed psychotic who really intimate with a switchblade to 9 fingered wonder Harvey B Dunn who adds new meaning to `giving the bird'. Some scenes are so kampy, it's funny. An interview with naïve actress really had me laughing when the interviewer slyly explains what type of film they'll be shooting. Also, a group of teeners (aka more of Ed's extras) witness a fight break out for no reason!! To try and explain the hilarity of this scene would not do it justice. Count how many desk scenes there are till your wall paint starts peeling! And that Kline, can he steal a scene or what?

    Ah, but let's not forget Jean Fontaine as Gloria. Her grating voice really adds a menacing presence (I will never look at a leotard the same way ever again). Maybe smut wasn't the problem and Gloria was the root of the problem? Well, that or her seal tight ensemble displayed throughout the movie! Listening to Gloria's logic and way of reasoning makes me realize that caning may not be such a bad thing after all. And her great line "Dirk? No, that can't be Dirk. Uh-uh. No, that's not Dirk. No" is well worth the price of admission.

    There's so much more like shooting on the smut set of scantily clad (?) actresses, abrupt jump cuts, a police raid (HA HA HA), the Syndicate….oh man, some directors wish they could create movies with the flair Ed Wood had. I'm starting to see method in Ed's madness.
    ticklemetorgo

    Ed Wood: Not horrible, just incompetent

    You know that when Mr. Wood made a film he did put all of his heart and soul in each one of the films (ok the ones I saw and the 50's films that most people see) The problem being is that he was completely incompetent as a director. You can't polish a turd and all of these films are turds. But he did try his best, in my opinion this is one of the best and funniest, with or without MST. A fairly static film, the only action happening with a fight scene. The rest of the film consist of all the actors explaining about the plot. Carl Anthony is the most static of this bunch. Kenne Duncan and Duke Moore, two of the laziest cops on the beat. Then the rest, Jaffe, Mr. Taxpayer, Dirk (a swell guy), Kline (KLINE!!!!!) and best of all: GLORIA. The scariest woman on the planet who's probably passed on by now of throat cancer, or squeezed to death by some of those outfits, likely from Mr. Woods own collection. Why this film is not on DVD like the rest of the Ed Wood collection I don't know. Somebody get out there and pester Wade Williams productions and get this on DVD too.
    1counterrevolutionary

    Eddie, we hardly knew ye.

    Some people believe that Ed Wood knew exactly what he was doing: that he *intended* to make "bad" movies in order to make people laugh. There are plenty of good reasons not to buy into that theory, and THE SINISTER URGE is Exhibit A.

    PLAN 9 FROM OUTER SPACE, GLEN OR GLENDA, and BRIDE OF THE MONSTER are endearing in their goofy lunacy. This one, though just as bad as the rest of Wood's oeuvre, is mostly just plodding and dull.

    Not that there isn't entertainment to be had here, at least for the bad movie connoisseur: my personal favorite is the obvious use of pre-existing (and completely unrelated) footage, shoehorned in on the waste-not want-not principle and "justified" through the use of atrocious dubbing and risible expository dialogue (which takes place *after* the inserted scene, making it even more ludicrous).

    But that's not the sort of thing calculated to make a mainstream audience roar with laughter.

    I can imagine someone trying to make a movie like PLAN 9. I can't imagine anyone trying to make a movie like this.
    madsagittarian

    Ed Wood's final masterpiece?

    What a night. The stuff of which legends are made.

    In 1995 in beautiful downtown Toronto, when Tim Burton's mighty biopic ED WOOD went into second-run, one of our rep cinemas had a never-to-be-forgotten quadruple bill of films by everyone's favourite cross-dressing auteur. JAIL BAIT, BRIDE OF THE MONSTER, NIGHT OF THE GHOULS preceded this, the final programme of the evening, and perhaps Ed Wood's final masterpiece (well, for his "legit" non-porn movies anyway). From the expected pimply nerdy geeks to one dignified old gentleman who said that they SHOULD have given Mr. Wood a star in front of Grauman's, this, the least seen of all of Wood's pictures from his "classical" period, was a real crowd pleaser.

    THE SINISTER URGE is a must for anyone with even a passing interest in the films of this precious Gonzo genius, or, like myself, who have a strange attraction to works made by people who eke out an existence way way way in the back alleys of Tinseltown. This riotous "expose" is classic Edward D.: long scenes which don't go anywhere (including an extract from his uncompleted JD epic- HELLBORN), priceless dialogue which waxes profundity about everything and nothing, and a strange attempt at morality while also delivering whatever exploitation elements that unsuspecting people paid to see.

    My favourite bits include:

    1) the long scene where the two hardworking cops out to bust the porn ring must explain to an anonymous taxpayer who comes to the station, and tell him exactly why they are spending his hard-earned tax dollars on such a seemingly trivial matter; this scene wouldn't even pass the green light in a pre-production meeting for an educational film, however with typically Woodian panache, the taxpayer leaves afterwards shaking his head in amazement over the great public service these man are performing. Once again, within his ridiculous subplots, Wood slyly inserts bits where you realize how subversive his scenarios really are. The ever-critical writer-director is simultaneously praising and damning these intrepid cops for a seemingly superfluous service-- remember, only two years later the US government spent a huge wad of the taxpayers' money to decipher the lyrics to "Louie Louie" because the song was considered to be corrupting the minds of impressionable youngsters.

    2) the director's cameo appearance; since one of the main subplots concerns some knife-wielding loony who attacks women in the park (apparently looking at semi-clad girls in magazines drove him to his social deviance), the two cops talk about sending an undercover male officer in drag to the park and foil the psychotic pervert (right here, the audience knowingly began to applaud), and in the next scene, there is Mr. Wood in a dress and mop wig trying to ferret out the guy in the park. A cameo appearance to save some money instead of hiring another bit player? In most likelihood, a good excuse for the eccentric auteur to insert his personal baggage-- a Brechtian cry for identity.

    3) a bizarre climax, featuring a decapitated head in someone's bushes!

    Man, they sure don't make them like this anymore. Seeing THE SINISTER URGE is like a breath of fresh air. As much as PLAN 9, GLEN OR GLENDA and BRIDE OF THE MONSTER are important works of this pioneering independent filmmaker, the stories about their creation, and their dialogue is cited so often that perhaps they no longer seem new. It is great to see this, and also JAIL BAIT, and appreciate the charms that even his under-hyped works have.

    Mehr wie diese

    Night of the Ghouls
    3,6
    Night of the Ghouls
    Die Rache des Würgers
    4,2
    Die Rache des Würgers
    Jail Bait
    3,7
    Jail Bait
    Plan 9 aus dem Weltall
    3,9
    Plan 9 aus dem Weltall
    Take It Out in Trade
    3,7
    Take It Out in Trade
    Blumen ohne Duft
    6,1
    Blumen ohne Duft
    Meatcleaver Massacre
    3,7
    Meatcleaver Massacre
    Glen or Glenda
    4,3
    Glen or Glenda
    The Violent Years
    3,6
    The Violent Years
    Final Curtain
    4,5
    Final Curtain
    The Astounding She-Monster
    3,6
    The Astounding She-Monster
    Anatomy of a Psycho
    4,1
    Anatomy of a Psycho

    Handlung

    Ändern

    Wusstest du schon

    Ändern
    • Wissenswertes
      Ironically, this "pornography expose" was Edward D. Wood Jr.'s last legitimate film before delving into writing softcore pornography himself.
    • Patzer
      Police leave the police station in a black and white 1959 Ford and arrive at the City Park in a black and white 1960 Dodge Dart.
    • Zitate

      [Mary sees Ed Wood posters on pornographer Johnny Ride's office wall.]

      Mary Smith: Are gangster and horror films all you produce?

      Johnny Ryde: Those are made by friends of mine. I think you'll find my type of picture entirely different.

    • Verbindungen
      Edited into Sleazemania Strikes Back (1985)
    • Soundtracks
      Synchrostings
      (uncredited)

      Music by Trevor Duncan

    Top-Auswahl

    Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
    Anmelden

    FAQ15

    • How long is The Sinister Urge?Powered by Alexa

    Details

    Ändern
    • Erscheinungsdatum
      • 8. Dezember 1960 (Vereinigte Staaten)
    • Herkunftsland
      • Vereinigte Staaten
    • Sprache
      • Englisch
    • Auch bekannt als
      • Зловещий толчок
    • Drehorte
      • Griffith Park, Los Angeles, Kalifornien, USA(site of Griffith Park Observatory)
    • Produktionsfirma
      • Headliner Productions
    • Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen

    Box Office

    Ändern
    • Budget
      • 20.152 $ (geschätzt)
    Weitere Informationen zur Box Office finden Sie auf IMDbPro.

    Technische Daten

    Ändern
    • Laufzeit
      • 1 Std. 11 Min.(71 min)
    • Farbe
      • Black and White
    • Sound-Mix
      • Mono
    • Seitenverhältnis
      • 1.37 : 1

    Zu dieser Seite beitragen

    Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen
    • Erfahre mehr über das Beitragen
    Seite bearbeiten

    Mehr entdecken

    Zuletzt angesehen

    Bitte aktiviere Browser-Cookies, um diese Funktion nutzen zu können. Weitere Informationen
    Hol dir die IMDb-App
    Melde dich an für Zugriff auf mehr InhalteMelde dich an für Zugriff auf mehr Inhalte
    Folge IMDb in den sozialen Netzwerken
    Hol dir die IMDb-App
    Für Android und iOS
    Hol dir die IMDb-App
    • Hilfe
    • Inhaltsverzeichnis
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • IMDb-Daten lizenzieren
    • Pressezimmer
    • Werbung
    • Jobs
    • Allgemeine Geschäftsbedingungen
    • Datenschutzrichtlinie
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, ein Amazon-Unternehmen

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.