IMDb-BEWERTUNG
6,1/10
242
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuDue to his physical resemblance to criminal Steve Chancellor, law enforcement recruits seaman Larry Ellis to pose as Chancellor and infiltrate an organized crime ring in France.Due to his physical resemblance to criminal Steve Chancellor, law enforcement recruits seaman Larry Ellis to pose as Chancellor and infiltrate an organized crime ring in France.Due to his physical resemblance to criminal Steve Chancellor, law enforcement recruits seaman Larry Ellis to pose as Chancellor and infiltrate an organized crime ring in France.
- Regie
- Drehbuch
- Hauptbesetzung
Gérard Oury
- Julius Pindar
- (as Gerard Oury)
Jacques B. Brunius
- Lessage
- (as Jacques Brunius)
Carl Jaffe
- Walter Dorffman
- (as Carl Jaffé)
Balbina
- Lauderbach's Maid
- (Nicht genannt)
Yves Chanteau
- Matthews
- (Nicht genannt)
Jean Driant
- Gratz's Assistant
- (Nicht genannt)
Violet Gould
- Barmaid
- (Nicht genannt)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
I just watched this film and having also read these reviews here I certainly agree with 2 of them...
Definitely this is an A rather than a B and is no doubt this has all the hallmarks of prototype Bond film.
I finished watching this movie thinking how much I would have enjoyed Michael Craig as the first James Bond.... I'm saying that based on putting aside Sean Connery's role and rather thinking of Craig being the first to play the role in the Bond franchise...
I personally think we would look back at the first Bond film (franchise that is) and might well consider Craig to have been the quintessential Bond as perhaps Ian Fleming might have seen him when discussing a film adaptation of his book... I know Fleming was more minded towards Christopher Lee, to some degree, especially as Lee had actually lived that role in his wartime experiences... however, I think Michael Craig would have brought a piece of every later Bond we have come to know.
I really enjoyed this film, I think some parts were rushed; probably to keep within a set time for cinema purposes but I would have preferred to see those edits kept in the film as the running time wasn't a factor as I watched... I have a habit of first forwarding on some occasions or making tea... scenes like the death/murder of a supporting character by the baddies or Craig's diversion on his way to the airport to name but a few.
Overall I really enjoyed this film and the performance of Michael Craig.... I've seen him many times before and this character and his performance stood out to me as he really added to the whole story ...
I'm not someone that cares to much about cinematography, editing, plot holes or having to suspend belief .... a film for me is good if it takes my eye off the time and allows me to just enjoy it without thinking about what's going to happen next. ( I hate spoiling it for myself by working out who did it, how they did it or who will win etc let's be frank we can all do that to some degree and I never get why reviewers always seem to want to tell us how quickly they managed it or how unbelievable a film was {Its a film... they are all unbelievable... if anyone wants believable then watch a documentary!}... sorry I'm digressing)
So I would recommend this film if you want to escape looking at that watch for 90 odd minutes and enjoying a good old adventure yarn.
WWG1WGA
Definitely this is an A rather than a B and is no doubt this has all the hallmarks of prototype Bond film.
I finished watching this movie thinking how much I would have enjoyed Michael Craig as the first James Bond.... I'm saying that based on putting aside Sean Connery's role and rather thinking of Craig being the first to play the role in the Bond franchise...
I personally think we would look back at the first Bond film (franchise that is) and might well consider Craig to have been the quintessential Bond as perhaps Ian Fleming might have seen him when discussing a film adaptation of his book... I know Fleming was more minded towards Christopher Lee, to some degree, especially as Lee had actually lived that role in his wartime experiences... however, I think Michael Craig would have brought a piece of every later Bond we have come to know.
I really enjoyed this film, I think some parts were rushed; probably to keep within a set time for cinema purposes but I would have preferred to see those edits kept in the film as the running time wasn't a factor as I watched... I have a habit of first forwarding on some occasions or making tea... scenes like the death/murder of a supporting character by the baddies or Craig's diversion on his way to the airport to name but a few.
Overall I really enjoyed this film and the performance of Michael Craig.... I've seen him many times before and this character and his performance stood out to me as he really added to the whole story ...
I'm not someone that cares to much about cinematography, editing, plot holes or having to suspend belief .... a film for me is good if it takes my eye off the time and allows me to just enjoy it without thinking about what's going to happen next. ( I hate spoiling it for myself by working out who did it, how they did it or who will win etc let's be frank we can all do that to some degree and I never get why reviewers always seem to want to tell us how quickly they managed it or how unbelievable a film was {Its a film... they are all unbelievable... if anyone wants believable then watch a documentary!}... sorry I'm digressing)
So I would recommend this film if you want to escape looking at that watch for 90 odd minutes and enjoying a good old adventure yarn.
WWG1WGA
For a french reviewer like me who love film noir, House Of Secrets is an absolute entertaining movie. I first loved all the Parisian locations (around rue du Bac, l'île Saint-Louis, Eiffel tower, rue Lamarck, an unknown restaurant) and Marseille.
The plot with impersonation is interesting with some fine twists. The fights are real fast paced, destroying the furniture more violently than in American serials. The cinematography by Harry Waxman is very colorful and shadowy. The editing by the brilliant Sidney Hayers (soon to direct Circus Of Horrors and Burn Witch Burn) is real fast and raw.
The best surprise again for a french reviewer is the casting of Gérard Oury as a badman, very surprising when you see his future top box office movies with Bourvil and Louis de Funès as a director...
Swell souvenir.
The plot with impersonation is interesting with some fine twists. The fights are real fast paced, destroying the furniture more violently than in American serials. The cinematography by Harry Waxman is very colorful and shadowy. The editing by the brilliant Sidney Hayers (soon to direct Circus Of Horrors and Burn Witch Burn) is real fast and raw.
The best surprise again for a french reviewer is the casting of Gérard Oury as a badman, very surprising when you see his future top box office movies with Bourvil and Louis de Funès as a director...
Swell souvenir.
Michael Craig would have been a terrific James Bond. I don't know if he was ever screen tested. He had the look and physical abilities. The story has more twists than a mountain road and a climax right out of a Bond film. Arnall and Bates brought eye candy and acting skills. The fight scenes were brutal and more realistic than the usual phoney slugfest.
As I was watching this I started to notice that the story arc seemed familiar. This 1956 film has all of the hallmarks of the 1960's James Bond films. The gangs, the double-crosses, the big schemes, the villain bosses, and the women. It's not a bad yarn.
Steve Chancellor is dead. That causes a crimp in a CIA sting operation on a gold-smuggling ring that is branching out into counterfeiting. Fortunately, seaman Michael Craig looks exactly like him, so he is inserted into the operations. As he gets into fist fights with various members of the group,he gradually moves up in the operations, until he is able to lead the law enforcement operations directly to the people. They are holding off until they can grab everyone, so Craig has to continue the impersonation. However, the bad guys have a plant in the Surete.
I's a nice spies-vs-crooks thriller, with an able cast that includes Brenda de Banzies, David Kousof, Gerard Oury, and Eric Pohlmann, running from Paris to Marseilles. Of course it's almost all shot on sets, with a few stock photos to lend that ambience so desired by big movie concerns. Guy Green directs with an eye owards thrills more than character exposition, and the ultimate solution is not what I expected, which is a good thing in the murky world of the CIA.
I's a nice spies-vs-crooks thriller, with an able cast that includes Brenda de Banzies, David Kousof, Gerard Oury, and Eric Pohlmann, running from Paris to Marseilles. Of course it's almost all shot on sets, with a few stock photos to lend that ambience so desired by big movie concerns. Guy Green directs with an eye owards thrills more than character exposition, and the ultimate solution is not what I expected, which is a good thing in the murky world of the CIA.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesLarry Ellis was offered to Dirk Bogarde.
- PatzerFor ship officer Larry Ellis to become trained so quickly to impersonate international criminal Steve Challenger is a considerable stretch for the suspension of disbelief that film viewers are expected to swallow. Furthermore, when Ellis is told that his voice doesn't match Challenger's and that he would have to alter it in order to convince all of Challenger's friends and accomplices, Ellis' voice doesn't noticeably change at all. In fact, his voice throughout is somewhat irritating.
- VerbindungenEdited into Who Dunit Theater: House of Secrets (2015)
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsland
- Sprachen
- Auch bekannt als
- Triple Deception
- Drehorte
- Produktionsfirmen
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 19 Minuten
- Seitenverhältnis
- 1.85 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen