IMDb-BEWERTUNG
5,3/10
388
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuDuring the Cold War, a mysterious plane carrying $3 million arrives at Tangier airport, and various interested parties try to grab the cash.During the Cold War, a mysterious plane carrying $3 million arrives at Tangier airport, and various interested parties try to grab the cash.During the Cold War, a mysterious plane carrying $3 million arrives at Tangier airport, and various interested parties try to grab the cash.
- Regie
- Drehbuch
- Hauptbesetzung
Madeleine Taylor Holmes
- Rosario
- (as Madeleine Holmes)
Rodd Redwing
- Police Orderly
- (as Rodric Redwing)
Eric Alden
- Moroccan
- (Nicht genannt)
Rama Bai
- Woman at Airport
- (Nicht genannt)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
A private plane, supposedly carrying $3 million, crashes outside the Tangier airport. The authorities find no bodies in the wreckage - neither pilot nor the courier carrying the $3 million. What happened to the people? An assortment of characters, who had been waiting on the plane, sets off to find the missing loot, including: Gil Walker (Jack Palance), friend of the plane's pilot; Susan Lane (Joan Fontaine), the missing pilot's fiancé and a recent arrival in Tangier; Danzer (Robert Douglas) and Goro (Marcel Dalio), two underworld types; and Nicki (Cornine Calvet), love interest to both Danzer and Gil. Who will get there first?
While I like Flight to Tangier, I really wanted to love it. It's filmed in that gorgeous 1950s era Technicolor that never ceases to amaze me. The cinematography is often quite stunning. The movie probably looks a million times better than it has any right to. Sets and locations are perfect. I especially liked the way the filmmakers tried to recreate the tight quarters of Tangier. The costumes also look fantastic. The dresses, the mobster suits, and the police uniforms are all impeccable. The outfits worn by Cornine Calvet steal the show - wow! The acting is first-rate. Joan Fontaine is Joan Fontaine and gives one of her typical outstanding performances. Jack Palance is the young, reluctant hero. It's interesting to watch him play something other than the typecast baddie he would later be associated with. Calvet is new to me, but she more than holds her own with the other actors. Douglas, Dalio, and the always dependable Jeff Morrow give fine supporting performances. Flight to Tangier includes plenty of action with fist fights, police chases, plane crashes, gunplay, mystery, suspense, and more. There really are very few dull moments. It's got just about everything I could ask for in a movie.
So, why don't I love Flight to Tangier? The answer is simple - the plot. To me, the plot is so unnecessarily complicated that it ends up being a weight on everything. It's a mess. Often, there's too much going on. A more streamlined focus and approach could have done wonders for the movie. And the plot falls apart in the final scenes. The movie sort of fizzles out and loses steam by the last act and sort of limps its way to the finish. Flight to Tangier deserved a bigger send-off.
While I like Flight to Tangier, I really wanted to love it. It's filmed in that gorgeous 1950s era Technicolor that never ceases to amaze me. The cinematography is often quite stunning. The movie probably looks a million times better than it has any right to. Sets and locations are perfect. I especially liked the way the filmmakers tried to recreate the tight quarters of Tangier. The costumes also look fantastic. The dresses, the mobster suits, and the police uniforms are all impeccable. The outfits worn by Cornine Calvet steal the show - wow! The acting is first-rate. Joan Fontaine is Joan Fontaine and gives one of her typical outstanding performances. Jack Palance is the young, reluctant hero. It's interesting to watch him play something other than the typecast baddie he would later be associated with. Calvet is new to me, but she more than holds her own with the other actors. Douglas, Dalio, and the always dependable Jeff Morrow give fine supporting performances. Flight to Tangier includes plenty of action with fist fights, police chases, plane crashes, gunplay, mystery, suspense, and more. There really are very few dull moments. It's got just about everything I could ask for in a movie.
So, why don't I love Flight to Tangier? The answer is simple - the plot. To me, the plot is so unnecessarily complicated that it ends up being a weight on everything. It's a mess. Often, there's too much going on. A more streamlined focus and approach could have done wonders for the movie. And the plot falls apart in the final scenes. The movie sort of fizzles out and loses steam by the last act and sort of limps its way to the finish. Flight to Tangier deserved a bigger send-off.
Written and directed by Charles Marquis Warren, Flight to Tangier stars Joan Fontaine, Jack Palance, Corinne Calvet and Robert Douglas. Music is by Paul Sawtell and cinematography by Ray Rennahan.
Tangier airport, and a group of people await the arrival of as plane from behind the Iron Curtain. When said plane crashes and burns, it is found that there are no survivors or indeed any corpses. So exactly where is the missing courier worth $3 million? And just exactly what do these group of people have to do with the crashed plane?
Someone somewhere in a big room full of executives at Paramount Pictures thought this was going to be a great Cold War type thriller. A drama awash with spies, black market dastards, shifty femmes and undercover operatives. Unfortunately what follows is immeasurably dull. A bunch of folk stand around musing about politico guff, then there's a half hearted chase sequence, some more politico guff, another lame chase sequence, and on it goes in the same fashion until the inevitable tepid ending closes the whole sorry picture down.
Fontaine, looking lovely as usual, and Palance give it plenty of gusto, while the Technicolor is nice to take in. But once the poorly scripted contrivances start to take precedence over character dynamics, and the action scenes begin to bore, you realise you have been cheated and feel the need to strangle one of those Paramount executives. So avoid unless you suffer from insomnia. 3/10
Tangier airport, and a group of people await the arrival of as plane from behind the Iron Curtain. When said plane crashes and burns, it is found that there are no survivors or indeed any corpses. So exactly where is the missing courier worth $3 million? And just exactly what do these group of people have to do with the crashed plane?
Someone somewhere in a big room full of executives at Paramount Pictures thought this was going to be a great Cold War type thriller. A drama awash with spies, black market dastards, shifty femmes and undercover operatives. Unfortunately what follows is immeasurably dull. A bunch of folk stand around musing about politico guff, then there's a half hearted chase sequence, some more politico guff, another lame chase sequence, and on it goes in the same fashion until the inevitable tepid ending closes the whole sorry picture down.
Fontaine, looking lovely as usual, and Palance give it plenty of gusto, while the Technicolor is nice to take in. But once the poorly scripted contrivances start to take precedence over character dynamics, and the action scenes begin to bore, you realise you have been cheated and feel the need to strangle one of those Paramount executives. So avoid unless you suffer from insomnia. 3/10
This was the movie Carla Jean was watching in " No Country For Old Men" when Lewellyn returned with the drug money.
Why did the Coen Brothers select this film? They certainly had seen this film and selected it for some oblique artistic reason or simply because they liked the movie. I've never seen this film. Is there some aspect of Flight To Tangier" that links it to "No Country For Old Men?"
Would anyone disagree that the Coen Brothers are way too sophisticated and detailed oriented to simply throw any movie on a television one of their characters was viewing?
.
Why did the Coen Brothers select this film? They certainly had seen this film and selected it for some oblique artistic reason or simply because they liked the movie. I've never seen this film. Is there some aspect of Flight To Tangier" that links it to "No Country For Old Men?"
Would anyone disagree that the Coen Brothers are way too sophisticated and detailed oriented to simply throw any movie on a television one of their characters was viewing?
.
A plane lands at Tangier with three million dollars on it. Only no one can find it. That doesn't stop Joan Fontaine, Jack Palance, Corinne Calvet, Robert Douglas and Marcel Dalio from running around the city and suburbs - actually the Paramount lot and local air port - from looking for it in a shifting web of alliances.
John Warren Marquand's movie is noteworthy more for the fact it was shot in 3D and Technicolor than in being much more than a potboiler. What Dalio was doing here is not clear; probably picking up a paycheck. After all, in a career that spanned half a century and included THE RULES OF THE GAME and SUPERMWITCH OF LOVE ISLAND, there were highs and lows and a lot of in-betweens. This is somewhere in between. Potboiler, programmer, call it what you will, this clearly was intended for writer-director Marquand's break out of the 'shaky A' western, but despite the glossy cast and Ray Rennahan in charge of the camera, it doesn't offer anything special except the gimmick of 3D; and I saw it in a flat TV print, so that wasn't there
John Warren Marquand's movie is noteworthy more for the fact it was shot in 3D and Technicolor than in being much more than a potboiler. What Dalio was doing here is not clear; probably picking up a paycheck. After all, in a career that spanned half a century and included THE RULES OF THE GAME and SUPERMWITCH OF LOVE ISLAND, there were highs and lows and a lot of in-betweens. This is somewhere in between. Potboiler, programmer, call it what you will, this clearly was intended for writer-director Marquand's break out of the 'shaky A' western, but despite the glossy cast and Ray Rennahan in charge of the camera, it doesn't offer anything special except the gimmick of 3D; and I saw it in a flat TV print, so that wasn't there
The resounding success of "Casablanca" (1942), brought about an avalanche of movies hoping to capitalize on the elements of its success.
For an exotic location, Casablanca was already taken, but Tangier would do. Great, a caper in Tangier, with international tentacles; an American star (Jack Palance) and his girl (Joan Fontaine); a bunch of non-native baddies; and the French police lurking in the background.
The movie was written and directed by Charles Marquis Warren (helped develop "Rawhide" and "Gunsmoke" for TV).
I won't get into the plot. You can look it up or simply watch the film on YouTube. Warren must have had quite an imagination, because the narrative was not too bad. The problem with the movie was in the execution. Palance fell flat as a romantic lead. The script was flimsy. Direction failed to bring out the best in Fontaine and in the key supporting cast. What we got was a rather dull and boring film. The drama came across as superficial and was not very convincing, so the thriller effect does not come across as it could have.
I watched this movie to discover how Arabs were portrayed, but there was not much depiction of the natives. The movie was not interested in the natives. Tangier was just a stage and even then, much of the events take place outside the city proper.
The movie was shot in its entirety at Paramount studies. The studio created quite a sophisticated replica of the narrow streets of Tangier, complete with costumed extras walking back and forth, and donkey-driven carts.
The greatest claim to fame for the film m, however, was that it was the second of only two 3D films shot in Technicolor.
The film is rated 5.3 on IMDb.
For an exotic location, Casablanca was already taken, but Tangier would do. Great, a caper in Tangier, with international tentacles; an American star (Jack Palance) and his girl (Joan Fontaine); a bunch of non-native baddies; and the French police lurking in the background.
The movie was written and directed by Charles Marquis Warren (helped develop "Rawhide" and "Gunsmoke" for TV).
I won't get into the plot. You can look it up or simply watch the film on YouTube. Warren must have had quite an imagination, because the narrative was not too bad. The problem with the movie was in the execution. Palance fell flat as a romantic lead. The script was flimsy. Direction failed to bring out the best in Fontaine and in the key supporting cast. What we got was a rather dull and boring film. The drama came across as superficial and was not very convincing, so the thriller effect does not come across as it could have.
I watched this movie to discover how Arabs were portrayed, but there was not much depiction of the natives. The movie was not interested in the natives. Tangier was just a stage and even then, much of the events take place outside the city proper.
The movie was shot in its entirety at Paramount studies. The studio created quite a sophisticated replica of the narrow streets of Tangier, complete with costumed extras walking back and forth, and donkey-driven carts.
The greatest claim to fame for the film m, however, was that it was the second of only two 3D films shot in Technicolor.
The film is rated 5.3 on IMDb.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesBy report, the second of only two 3-D films shot in 3-strip Technicolor (and thus requiring six strips of film); the first was Money From Home (1953).
- PatzerWhen Gil, Susan, and Nikki are asleep in the grove, a small plane searching for them wakens them. The branches Gil had previously placed on the car to camouflage it disappear then reappear when the camera changes from the plane to the car.
- VerbindungenFeatured in Odyssee 3D - Aufbruch in die 3. Dimension (1999)
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsland
- Sprachen
- Auch bekannt als
- Flight to Tangier
- Drehorte
- Produktionsfirma
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
- Laufzeit
- 1 Std. 30 Min.(90 min)
- Seitenverhältnis
- 1.66 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen