IMDb-BEWERTUNG
7,1/10
2110
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuThe housekeeper to a retired actress tries at the same time to look after her own two emotionally disturbed sisters, with dramatic results.The housekeeper to a retired actress tries at the same time to look after her own two emotionally disturbed sisters, with dramatic results.The housekeeper to a retired actress tries at the same time to look after her own two emotionally disturbed sisters, with dramatic results.
- Für 2 Oscars nominiert
- 5 Gewinne & 2 Nominierungen insgesamt
Empfohlene Bewertungen
it's been so many years since i've seen this remarkable movie that most of it is forgotten. but its effect endures. that brick oven in almost every interior shot. the subtle verbal fencing between feather and ellen creed. the simple-minded amusements of her sisters. her panic near the end is so well conveyed, i still remember her face. ida lupino elaborated on her great acting in "the light that failed". she deserves to be remembered as one of the great female stars. the atmosphere of this film is very much like "night must fall", which featured a hatbox instead of a brick oven. louis hayward was a perfect foil for lupino, his insinuating, prying remarks bringing out her best (worst) emotions. i can't wait to see this gem of english intrigue another time.
Ellen Creed (Ida Lupino) is the servant and companion of a well to do older woman, Miss Fiske. However, Ellen has a serious problem...she's the sole support for her two mentally ill sisters...and the sisters have been tossed out of the place that was caring for them. You can understand why, as one of the sisters (Elsa Lanchester) is rather surly and the other is quite out of touch with reality. So Ellen maneuver's her employer into letting the pair stay with them a few days. However, the days turn into weeks and the sisters are almost impossible to live with, so Miss Fiske insists that Ellen make other arrangements. With no easy solution to her dilemma, Ellen does something pretty dreadful. Little does she know that her slimy nephew (Louis Hayward) is about to arrive for a visit...and he's NOT mentally ill....just a conniving sociopath! Slowly he puts the puzzle pieces together and he realizes Ellen has done something even he wouldn't do! And, not surprisingly, he plans on taking full advantage of the situation.
This is an excellent and interesting film. I especially like that the plot is quite unique....and because of this it offers many surprises. The acting by Lupino was excellent and I appreciate how she allowed the makeup folks to make her look unglamorous and 'normal'...many actresses would have resisted this. Even more impressive is Hayward's performance...one of his very best. He is wonderful as the slimy nephew...very convincing and fascinating in every scene. My only complaint in the acting was Edith Barrett as one of the mentally ill sisters...as her performance seemed forced and a bit overdone. Subtle it wasn't. Overall, the good very much outweighs the bad...and it's a film lovers of classic cinema need to see.
This is an excellent and interesting film. I especially like that the plot is quite unique....and because of this it offers many surprises. The acting by Lupino was excellent and I appreciate how she allowed the makeup folks to make her look unglamorous and 'normal'...many actresses would have resisted this. Even more impressive is Hayward's performance...one of his very best. He is wonderful as the slimy nephew...very convincing and fascinating in every scene. My only complaint in the acting was Edith Barrett as one of the mentally ill sisters...as her performance seemed forced and a bit overdone. Subtle it wasn't. Overall, the good very much outweighs the bad...and it's a film lovers of classic cinema need to see.
This is a weird one, atmospheric, moody, and brooding. It has a script by Reginald Denham based on his play, and although director Charles Vidor makes sure it does not come across as stagey, but makes the confined atmosphere work for him, the action has a kind of mental proscenium arch around it. This was Edith Barrett's first film, and she is superb. Elsa Lanchester does well in another one of her roles as an insane eccentric. What is particularly fascinating is to see the young Evelyn Keyes aged 25 but looking a virginal 18, and the sweetest little thing you ever saw. It is hard to imagine she had already made 15 films, as she looks straight out of the milk parlour. When I knew her in her mid-fifties she was so ultra-sophisticated that the idea of her ever having been innocent seems inconceivable. But she certainly is in this film! I guess that's called acting! She later married the director of this film, before moving on to Artie Shaw and John Huston (and anyone who could survive Huston as a husband was no little girl!). Ida Lupino plays the lead role, but it is a thankless task, because it is her job to look intense all the time, with very little scope for anything else. What a waste of her talents! She kisses the heads of her mad sisters very lovingly, and that's about all the emotion she is allowed to show. This is a claustrophobic story of how crazy people do crazy things. There might be a murder committed, but I'm not telling. It is set in a kind of mythical Essex marshes, and the sun never shines once through the mist. They must have used up all the dry ice in London for this film.
In 1942, I expect the studios tossed off productions like this like cars on an assembly line. But don't let that fool you. Assembly line product or no, this is an atmospheric and expertly acted 90 minutes from Columbia Pictures, with that great unsung actress of the period Ida Lupino, supported by two of the daffiest character actresses of the day, Elsa Lanchester and the wild-eyed Edith Barrett.
And what a wacky production it is. Adapted from a stage play, everything takes place on a single foggy sound stage. But that's okay because it's a Gothic thriller with lots of shadowy interiors and dark secrets inside a big old house. Lupino's cursed with two ditzy sisters and, by golly, she's going to take care of them come what may. It's this unbending family loyalty that finally lends Lupino's role an uncommon measure of dramatic pathos. Watch her with her tightly wrapped hairdo and stiff-necked manner. It's like she's taken a solemn oath to defend her pathetic sisters, and she's going to do it, no matter the sacrifice, unlike the bounder Louis Hayward who takes advantage of the situation only to enrich himself. But it's really the girlish Barrett, an obscure RKO actress, who steals the show-- all innocence and wide-eyed enthusiasm over the least little thing. No wonder, Lupino takes extreme protective measures.
Stylish director Charles Vidor does a lot with the slender material. Just consider the single, fog-bound set that could have become impossibly static. But Vidor keeps things moving and our attention with it. Then too, he knows how to use the Louis Hayward character to liven up the Gothic solemnity. What's also notable is that neither the screenplay nor Vidor takes the easy way out by vilifying the flighty Mrs. Fiske (Isobel Elsom). She's ultimately as sympathetic as Lupino. I kept wondering what Hitchcock would have done with the material since the theme and characters are right up his alley. Be that as it may, this is one of the many by-passed gems from the studios' golden age, and deserves rediscovery on its own many merits.
And what a wacky production it is. Adapted from a stage play, everything takes place on a single foggy sound stage. But that's okay because it's a Gothic thriller with lots of shadowy interiors and dark secrets inside a big old house. Lupino's cursed with two ditzy sisters and, by golly, she's going to take care of them come what may. It's this unbending family loyalty that finally lends Lupino's role an uncommon measure of dramatic pathos. Watch her with her tightly wrapped hairdo and stiff-necked manner. It's like she's taken a solemn oath to defend her pathetic sisters, and she's going to do it, no matter the sacrifice, unlike the bounder Louis Hayward who takes advantage of the situation only to enrich himself. But it's really the girlish Barrett, an obscure RKO actress, who steals the show-- all innocence and wide-eyed enthusiasm over the least little thing. No wonder, Lupino takes extreme protective measures.
Stylish director Charles Vidor does a lot with the slender material. Just consider the single, fog-bound set that could have become impossibly static. But Vidor keeps things moving and our attention with it. Then too, he knows how to use the Louis Hayward character to liven up the Gothic solemnity. What's also notable is that neither the screenplay nor Vidor takes the easy way out by vilifying the flighty Mrs. Fiske (Isobel Elsom). She's ultimately as sympathetic as Lupino. I kept wondering what Hitchcock would have done with the material since the theme and characters are right up his alley. Be that as it may, this is one of the many by-passed gems from the studios' golden age, and deserves rediscovery on its own many merits.
Some people get the strangest notions. Take Ida Lupino in Ladies In Retirement. She's served faithfully and well as a companion/secretary to rich Isobel Elsom for many years and when her sisters Elsa Lanchester and Edith Barrett come for a visit Elsom allows them to stay. But when they start taking over the place Elsom says they have to go. Instead it's Elsom who goes rather permanently and the story goes out that the woman has gone away.
Also now squatting at the residence is the nephew of all three of the sisters, son of a fourth sister who was apparently the only one who married. He's played by Louis Hayward and this isolated place on the English moors is ideal for a man who is on the run from the authorities after stealing 100 pounds from the bank he was employed at. He's guilty of embezzlement, but aunt Ida is guilty of maybe something far worse.
Once again Hayward shows his versatility after playing the swashbuckling hero son of the Count Of Monte Cristo now reverts to playing a blackmailing villain. He never had the major studio ties that his two main competitors Errol Flynn and Tyrone Power had, but he also was allowed to vary his roles as he wasn't as big a star as these other two. Hayward was just a fine and versatile actor.
Lupino though is the real star here. A very steely woman with iron self control she sees her world start to crumble around her as people become suspicious. Most suspicious of all is Hayward who even though he's on the run isn't above attempting some blackmail. Impervious to it all are clueless spinsters Lanchester and Barrett.
Those moors which provided so much story inspiration to Charlotte Bronte and Arthur Conan Doyle serve once again as a grand back drop to Ladies In Retirement. The final fadeout of Lupino on those moors is unforgettable.
Ladies In Retirement got Oscar nominations for Art Direction and Music Scoring. Sad that neither Ida Lupino or Louis Hayward were similarly recognized. Though they got each other as prizes as Hayward married the woman who played his maiden aunt in the film.
Definitely a film for Ida Lupino fans and Louis Hayward is an actor waiting to be rediscovered.
Also now squatting at the residence is the nephew of all three of the sisters, son of a fourth sister who was apparently the only one who married. He's played by Louis Hayward and this isolated place on the English moors is ideal for a man who is on the run from the authorities after stealing 100 pounds from the bank he was employed at. He's guilty of embezzlement, but aunt Ida is guilty of maybe something far worse.
Once again Hayward shows his versatility after playing the swashbuckling hero son of the Count Of Monte Cristo now reverts to playing a blackmailing villain. He never had the major studio ties that his two main competitors Errol Flynn and Tyrone Power had, but he also was allowed to vary his roles as he wasn't as big a star as these other two. Hayward was just a fine and versatile actor.
Lupino though is the real star here. A very steely woman with iron self control she sees her world start to crumble around her as people become suspicious. Most suspicious of all is Hayward who even though he's on the run isn't above attempting some blackmail. Impervious to it all are clueless spinsters Lanchester and Barrett.
Those moors which provided so much story inspiration to Charlotte Bronte and Arthur Conan Doyle serve once again as a grand back drop to Ladies In Retirement. The final fadeout of Lupino on those moors is unforgettable.
Ladies In Retirement got Oscar nominations for Art Direction and Music Scoring. Sad that neither Ida Lupino or Louis Hayward were similarly recognized. Though they got each other as prizes as Hayward married the woman who played his maiden aunt in the film.
Definitely a film for Ida Lupino fans and Louis Hayward is an actor waiting to be rediscovered.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesCo-stars Ida Lupino and Louis Hayward were married from 1938 to 1945.
- PatzerThe microphone shadow is visible over the fireplace when Mrs. Fiske has her showdown with Ellen's sisters about hauling junk into her home.
- Zitate
Louisa Creed: I hate the dark. It frightens me.
Sister Theresa: It shouldn't, my dear. Don't you believe we're watched over?
Louisa Creed: Oh yes. But I'm never quite sure who's watching us.
- Crazy CreditsThe film's title and the names of Ida Lupino and Louis Hayward appear as if they were rising to the surface of the swamp and floating there; the rest of the credits appear on tombstones and signs surrounding the area.
- VerbindungenRemade as Das Haus der blutigen Hände (1969)
- SoundtracksTit Willow
(uncredited)
Written by W.S. Gilbert and Arthur Sullivan
Performed on the piano by Miss Fisk and used as a theme through the film.
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is Ladies in Retirement?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsland
- Offizielle Standorte
- Sprache
- Auch bekannt als
- Das Geheimnis der drei Schwestern
- Produktionsfirma
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
- Laufzeit
- 1 Std. 31 Min.(91 min)
- Farbe
- Seitenverhältnis
- 1.37 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen