Frieda

Phew, that was a tough watch.. Not the production, Frieda is well made, but makes us all face up to our own prejudice and fear. I have no idea how this must have felt to the audience in 1947, I am sure many struggled to sympathise with Frieda, the enemy.

Today hatred is still rife, we live in a world that is still drawing dividing lines, for what.. where has it got us. Frieda tries to make us examine irrational fears and blind hatred. The film pushes us to see people as individuals.

I often look back at old cinema as a little simple, corny even, it is not often I sit in silence at the end and contemplate what I have seen, Frieda made me do this.

Should you watch this, yes if you like cinema that takes you somewhere and you like to empathise with tough subject matter. It is not an arty film and is extremely watchable.. But if you need whizzbangs and CGI this might not be the film for you.

All I can say to finish, I am glad I finally sat down to watch Frieda.

Though one of the reviewer has mentioned it to be dated, but is it really ? The racial prejudice - though used destructively by Nazis, existed during and even earlier, not only there, but elsewhere too- the Camping of Japanese (and the use of Vermin for them were a proof of it), even those who were citizens for generations, in USA, the treatment of Gypsies, the fate of the indigenous tribes every where - Maories, Amerindians, Dark-skinned persons,... and it continues even today. The people are still considered equal - or inferior - based on the skin and race. So one really can't call it dated. The mind-set of Nell is very common even today, and the others - are accessory, by compliance/ silence.

In the story, the heroine (Frieda's) parents were killed in allied bombing - and that well could have been by her love's brother, Alan, who was shot down while bombing the city. But that part of sympathy was missing - that of course isn't by error - may be even deliberate - the psychology of people to overlook the loss of "Others" even when that had been caused directly by "Us". The movie is about the girl, who has sacrificed everything to protect the man she loved (who didn't, at least initially), and her travails - in enemy domain, where she is racially prejudiced by all, and even the circumstances force her man to turn against her - forcing her to opt for divorce Italian (or catholic) style.

There was only one weakness in the narrative - Frieda's brother - his attitude was not normal. He was totally brainwashed Nazi, on that aspect I don't have complain, but he definitely can't make his innocent sister (that too, the only one left in the family) a sacrifice at the alter, and that too through false implications. In fact any brother, however ideologically blinded he might be, he would try to shield his kid sibling. The attitude of all others were explainable. Robert batted for Frieda - till he got irrefutable proof of her complicity - from her own brother. Nell was blindly prejudiced. The widowed sister in law, Judy wanted him for herself, and that was actively supported by all the family. Who, though not so much racially prejudiced as Nell, still were to quite some extent, probably due to the human losses suffered in the family - Robert and his step-brother were the only surviving - I wonder what happened to his step-father though.

Despite the semi-melodramatic presentation, it is worth a watch, to look at our own contemporary society, and reflect, aren't we all still in those ages and mind-set ? Aren't we still saying, as the woman remonstrated at registration office against "Giving out rations to a German girl" and "Soon we would be feeding the whole nation" .

Mai Zetterling, David Farrar, Flora Robson, and Glynis Johns star in Frieda from 1947.

Farrar is a pilot who brings his fiancé, a German woman, home to England, after she helps him escape.

The war is still going on, and she is not welcome. Farrah's sister (Robson) is running for office. When asked about the presence of Frieda, she says that just by virtue of Frieda being German, she bears the same sins as the Nazis.

Meanwhile, Robson encourages her brother's widow (Johns) to try to get Farrar away from Frieda.

Once the war ends, things become easier for Frieda, and she is accepted by the community.

One day her brother (Albert Levein) appears. He gives her a necklace with a swastika on it.

Good story of facing prejudice and coming to terms, for Frieda, of the horrible events that took place in her country.

Very good performances as some harsh realizations come to light for all involved.

By today's standards the acting looks a little dated as the characters come across as somewhat dour & rather too well mannered & polite. Today, in films we are bombarded with characters who have shovelfuls of attitude, aggression and cynicism. Today's film makers make no effort to hide feelings and emotions, but in 1947, it was still customary to keep a stiff upper lip, be courteous and behave at all times with decorum, which indeed this film exemplifies. The storyline is set in a rural, middle class family home, where social graces are still rigidly observed. The film throws an interesting light, not just on the niceties of middle class family life, but also on how patriotic and war weary citizens react to a young German woman being thrust into their midst. David Farrar, as Robert, is faced with a moral dilemma when he decides to do the 'decent' thing and marry Mai Zetterling, who helped him escape from Germany. The slow pace of the film is not to everyone's liking, but nevertheless the film, 'Frieda' gives the excellent cast sufficient time and space to portray believable characters and for the director to build a solid narrative. Although dull at times, I have given it a 7 out of 10, since it gives the modern day film buff the opportunity to see no nonsense quality acting without any frills.

One of the bravest, controversial Post war films around. A very uncomfortable and sensitive subject, treated delicately and with style. This must have been very hard viewing in 1947when it was released, shining a bright light on our humanity and making us consider our own prejudices and potentially shameful capabilities.