The Wild Party

I was surprised by how much I enjoyed watching 'The Wild Party'. It is not a brilliant film, but it is much better than I expected after having looked at some of the reviews here and having tried a couple of other early talkies (though none as early as this one). So what did I like about it? First of all Clara Bow of course. She comes across just as well as on silent film; in fact, I think she managed the transition to talking pictures excellently. Some contemporary and later reviewers disliked her New York accent. I don't, though admittedly English isn't my first language and I am no good at recognising regional accents. Her voice itself - occasionally criticised too - is perfectly alright as far as I am concerned. Her acting style is natural, not overdone - at least after the first couple of scenes, where she looks a bit nervous. All in all she is credible as a college student. The other female actors do very well, too. Most dialogue (again, after the actors got the first one of two scenes behind them) sounds fine - far better than the stilted and unnatural lines in the few talking scenes in 'Lonesome' for example, which came out only one year before 'The Wild Party'. The plot is nice enough. There are some enjoyable twists and turns and a reasonably satisfying conclusion. I am saying 'reasonably satisfying' because this conclusion involves the male lead actor, Fredric March, who I think was miscast in the role of professor Gilmore. He is supposed to be very much focused on academia and research, but that does not mean that he absolutely has to be quite so stuffy, boring and downright unfriendly (he does not even greet, let alone welcome the students in his new course). It beats me why all the girls go crazy about him.

'The Wild Party' is of course also interesting because it shows, if not what all-women colleges were like in the late 1920s, then at least how the general public assumed students and professors to behave. My, how things have changed! There is this professor, Gilmore, who saves the character played by Clara Bow from being gang raped by a group of drunks. His reaction? He says he worries about his position at the college. A moment later he passionately kisses Clara. THAT is what would make him worry today. Evidently the general public thought it was fine for members of faculty to have romantic relations with students (even though the college is implied to have frowned upon this kind behaviour). Well, at any rate, I liked 'The Wild Party'. It is definitely the most enjoyable early (i.e. Pre-1933) talkie I have watched so far. I recommend it.

Clara Bow is the most popular student at this staid women's college where classroom lectures are somber affairs but the dorm rooms are filled with personal drama. When the girls are able to sneak off campus and hit a party, they have some good times but run into danger as well.

This semester, all the girls are in love with handsome new professor Fredric March. A cautious friendship develops between March and Bow, but he tells her she is wasting her potential with all this partying. Eventually, Clara has a chance to prove her true worth - but will he understand the sacrifice she is making?

The plot here is fairly stodgy and the production is definitely early talkie era. As a fantasy of university life it's not too convincing but still, it's kind of fun.

Clara Bow is very much the center of the picture and she gives a good performance as the young woman who seems shallow when the story begins but grows into someone more mature, thoughtful, and generous. It's not a dramatic masterpiece by any stretch but Bow's character at least shows some development.

Fredric March, on the other hand, scowls his way through the whole picture. Why are all these girls in love with him?

Overall, it's a bit slow moving but not without interest.

The first thing I had to wonder, just prior to watching "The Wild Party" was whether or not it was based on the novelette I'd ripped through, just a month or so ago: The Wild Party by Joseph Mancuso March--originally published in 1928. Discovering that this was a very different story was my only disappointment.

It often seems that no small number of people, out there, don't want to give the early days of Hollywood the credit it so richly deserves. And that's sad; as sad as, say, the somewhat dark story behind "It" Girl, Clara Bow--whose mother considered slitting the girl's throat when Clara declared her she wanted to be an actress.

(Fortunately that didn't happen. If it had, film fans of today might not have an inkling of a clue that, even way back then--in the days that would become infamously known as "The Great Depression"--girls just wanted to have fun.)

Clara Bow plays her role of mischievous college girl, Stella Ames, to-the-hilt. And a young, debonaire Frederic March as straight-laced college professor Gilmore is her perfect counterpart.

The way the two begin seeing eye-to-eye may be said to be expected, but not totally predictable--because the antics of Stella Ames and her sorority sisters provide just the right element of subplot. If there was any one flaw in this gem, it was that the sound quality was often so scratchy, I was unsure, now and again, what one actor or another had said.

Still, this in no way detracts from the film's overall quality. (One must taken into account, after all, that 1929 was the infancy of the "talkie" era). Come to think of it, I can

only imagine what a "wild party" '29 must've been for many Hollywood executives and stars alike--the huge stock market crash aside!

This is the 35th or so Fredric March movie I have seen to date...and the earliest one. I must say overall I was not impressed with it. Fred was handsome to be sure...but his part was not very challenging or deep for him. He was fine in the movie though...wonderful voice, got to see him in knickers again (other time in the Marriage Playground)...hey, if I were at a college and he was a professor, I would be like Clara and her pals; take his class just because he's such a swell guy!!

About Clara Bow...I didn't think she was so great,you could tell she was definately meant to be a silent actress with all her facial and eye expressions, and I have no idea why Fred fell for her instead of her friend Helen, who was more of a nice and sweet girl. I found Clara very boisterous, rebellious; I did not like her voice or manner or personality. I found the clothing styles in this film hilarious!! Did people actually wear that kind of stuff??? And it surprised me how Clara looked like she could be a modern person, a person of now, I think because her hairstyle was so different--more frizzy and loose.

This is not a film that leaves you sighing at the wonderful acting or story...it left me just thinking, "that was interesting..." It is in no way Fredric's best. For that, see him in The Eagle and the Hawk, The Best Years of Our Lives, Smilin' Through, Dr.Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, We Live Again...there are many others out there besides this one. Still and all, I am glad to have seen this, Fred's 2nd talkie.

Paramount's first all-talking picture is nothing like you'd expect it to be. It's nothing like its title suggests either. If you've watched BABYLON, with Margot Robbie you might be expecting to see a badly acted, technically inept disaster but this actually a pretty decent movie. This massive hit of 1929 is still a hell of a lot better than a lot of films made one or two years afterwards!

The studio picked their biggest star, Clara Bow to draw in the crowds but this isn't just Miss Bow frolicking around in her underwear - well there is some of that but I was amazed to discover that this was a mature, thoughtful and thoroughly entertaining picture. Made by Hollywood's premiere (ok, only) female director, it's also got a strong feminist undercurrent which is absolutely not something you'd expect in 1929! The famous scene when Clara and her friends nearly get raped "because" they were dressed provocatively in a lot of films from the thirties (not just the thirties) would have been a misogynistic morality tale: "well look at them, they were asking for it." was the pervading attitude back then. Drunk middle-aged men groping girls was often depicted as being perfectly acceptable behaviour but in Miss Arzner's refreshingly progressive picture it's not, definitely not seen as acceptable.

Her direction is innovative and dynamic: it's as removed from being static and stage-bound as you can possibly imagine, it's even got a score (which wasn't normal until years later). The acting is still a little theatrical but as the film progresses, you can really see them, especially Clara Bow figuring out how to come across more naturally.

You watch some really old films simply out of interest, like museum curios. Some people might just want to see what Clara Bow was like (watch the superb CALL HER SAVAGE if you do...or better still, an Alice White film - the real 'it girl' of the twenties!) but this is so much more than something to tick off your list. You can watch this as a real piece of genuine entertainment. It's not quite one of those few classics of 1929 but it's still one of the best. It gives you a lovely sense of the age with an intelligent, enjoyable and surprisingly thought provoking script.