The Wild Party

Paramount's first all-talking picture is nothing like you'd expect it to be. It's nothing like its title suggests either. If you've watched BABYLON, with Margot Robbie you might be expecting to see a badly acted, technically inept disaster but this actually a pretty decent movie. This massive hit of 1929 is still a hell of a lot better than a lot of films made one or two years afterwards!

The studio picked their biggest star, Clara Bow to draw in the crowds but this isn't just Miss Bow frolicking around in her underwear - well there is some of that but I was amazed to discover that this was a mature, thoughtful and thoroughly entertaining picture. Made by Hollywood's premiere (ok, only) female director, it's also got a strong feminist undercurrent which is absolutely not something you'd expect in 1929! The famous scene when Clara and her friends nearly get raped "because" they were dressed provocatively in a lot of films from the thirties (not just the thirties) would have been a misogynistic morality tale: "well look at them, they were asking for it." was the pervading attitude back then. Drunk middle-aged men groping girls was often depicted as being perfectly acceptable behaviour but in Miss Arzner's refreshingly progressive picture it's not, definitely not seen as acceptable.

Her direction is innovative and dynamic: it's as removed from being static and stage-bound as you can possibly imagine, it's even got a score (which wasn't normal until years later). The acting is still a little theatrical but as the film progresses, you can really see them, especially Clara Bow figuring out how to come across more naturally.

You watch some really old films simply out of interest, like museum curios. Some people might just want to see what Clara Bow was like (watch the superb CALL HER SAVAGE if you do...or better still, an Alice White film - the real 'it girl' of the twenties!) but this is so much more than something to tick off your list. You can watch this as a real piece of genuine entertainment. It's not quite one of those few classics of 1929 but it's still one of the best. It gives you a lovely sense of the age with an intelligent, enjoyable and surprisingly thought provoking script.

Clara Bow is the most popular student at this staid women's college where classroom lectures are somber affairs but the dorm rooms are filled with personal drama. When the girls are able to sneak off campus and hit a party, they have some good times but run into danger as well.

This semester, all the girls are in love with handsome new professor Fredric March. A cautious friendship develops between March and Bow, but he tells her she is wasting her potential with all this partying. Eventually, Clara has a chance to prove her true worth - but will he understand the sacrifice she is making?

The plot here is fairly stodgy and the production is definitely early talkie era. As a fantasy of university life it's not too convincing but still, it's kind of fun.

Clara Bow is very much the center of the picture and she gives a good performance as the young woman who seems shallow when the story begins but grows into someone more mature, thoughtful, and generous. It's not a dramatic masterpiece by any stretch but Bow's character at least shows some development.

Fredric March, on the other hand, scowls his way through the whole picture. Why are all these girls in love with him?

Overall, it's a bit slow moving but not without interest.

Wild party girl Clara Bow (as Stella Ames) has plenty of fun at the "Winston" college for young women. Parties and roadhouse jaunts are the college girls' preoccupation. On the train trip to "Winston", Ms. Bow recalls accidentally climbing into bed with fellow traveler Fredric March (as James "Gil" Gilmore). As it turns out, Mr. March is the school's new Professor of Anthropology. Bow and her housemates see the good-looking teacher arrive, and immediately become interested in anthropological matters. Eventually, Bow and March fall into each other's arms, which threatens their student and teacher status at the college.

Bow's first "talkie" was not unsuccessful, although it is sometimes recalled as a failure. Perhaps, detractors are recalling Bow's subsequent talking features. Strangely, she became more unnatural, hesitant, and uneven in later films. Possibly, she was rattled by negative reviews. However, by 1931, Bow's performances became more assured. By then, unfortunately, it was too late for the huge audiences attending "The Wild Party" to appreciate her efforts.

"The Wild Party" is a more than respectable talking film debut; while undeniably silly, it was a fun "college youth" film. Bow wasn't going to be young forever, obviously; but, she could still carry out the college hi-jinks. March and the supporting cast perform well. And, Paramount assigned a woman, Dorothy Arzner, to direct the film.

Watch for one notably silent word "mouthed" the film. When Bow and the women are in the back seat of the car, they see March walking in the street, and Bow exclaims, "----!"

****** The Wild Party (4/6/29) Dorothy Arzner ~ Clara Bow, Fredric March, Joyce Compton

I'm going to have to disagree with the person who said you should watch it without the sound. You can tell its a early talkie and that all of the actresses are trying very hard to make the transition. Clara Bow was a sensational actress but she had a very hard time with sound. Its a cute film if you don't over analyze it too much. And its fun to hear what Clara sounded like. You can kind of hear her Brooklyn accent if you listen really hard. It is cheesy but its 1929! You weren't allowed to do anything in 1929! Clara is great and its unfortunate that she retired by the time she was 27. The Wild Party is about girls who don't take college seriously until Clara, who's kinda like the queen bee, meets Frederic March, who is her professor. Its fun to see what life may have been like in the early years of sound. Clara was so talented and beautiful.

This is the 35th or so Fredric March movie I have seen to date...and the earliest one. I must say overall I was not impressed with it. Fred was handsome to be sure...but his part was not very challenging or deep for him. He was fine in the movie though...wonderful voice, got to see him in knickers again (other time in the Marriage Playground)...hey, if I were at a college and he was a professor, I would be like Clara and her pals; take his class just because he's such a swell guy!!

About Clara Bow...I didn't think she was so great,you could tell she was definately meant to be a silent actress with all her facial and eye expressions, and I have no idea why Fred fell for her instead of her friend Helen, who was more of a nice and sweet girl. I found Clara very boisterous, rebellious; I did not like her voice or manner or personality. I found the clothing styles in this film hilarious!! Did people actually wear that kind of stuff??? And it surprised me how Clara looked like she could be a modern person, a person of now, I think because her hairstyle was so different--more frizzy and loose.

This is not a film that leaves you sighing at the wonderful acting or story...it left me just thinking, "that was interesting..." It is in no way Fredric's best. For that, see him in The Eagle and the Hawk, The Best Years of Our Lives, Smilin' Through, Dr.Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, We Live Again...there are many others out there besides this one. Still and all, I am glad to have seen this, Fred's 2nd talkie.