Nachdem drei britische Agenten während des Ersten Weltkriegs mit der Ermordung eines geheimnisvollen deutschen Spions beauftragt wurden, bekommen zwei von ihnen Skrupel, als ihre Pflicht geg... Alles lesenNachdem drei britische Agenten während des Ersten Weltkriegs mit der Ermordung eines geheimnisvollen deutschen Spions beauftragt wurden, bekommen zwei von ihnen Skrupel, als ihre Pflicht gegenüber der Mission in Konflikt mit ihrem Gewissen gerät.Nachdem drei britische Agenten während des Ersten Weltkriegs mit der Ermordung eines geheimnisvollen deutschen Spions beauftragt wurden, bekommen zwei von ihnen Skrupel, als ihre Pflicht gegenüber der Mission in Konflikt mit ihrem Gewissen gerät.
- Auszeichnungen
- 4 wins total
- Minor Role
- (Nicht genannt)
- Bit Part
- (Nicht genannt)
- Col. Anderson
- (Nicht genannt)
- Manager
- (Nicht genannt)
- Karl
- (Nicht genannt)
- Army Officer
- (Nicht genannt)
- Army Captain
- (Nicht genannt)
- Coachman
- (Nicht genannt)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
Curtis Stotlar
Like the other spy movies he did, (Take Torn Curtain and Topaz for instance, two of his later works. How much later? Nearly 40 years later), Secret Agent is a spy movie without lots of explosions or car chases or shootouts. Instead it is about a man who goes undercover to break up a potentially disastrous international agenda of some kind, and along the way falls in love with his partner and realizes that he's not up to the task of murdering someone.
This 1936 movie is another in Hitchcock's decade-long run of British talkies: highly-contrasted black and white, under 90 minutes generally, and devoid of major stars (except for Peter Lorre, who appears in this movie two years after he did The Man Who Knew Too Much).
But unlike many of the movies surrounding it (Young and Innocent, The 39 Steps), this one isn't quite as good. Not that Secret Agent is a bad movie, far from it:
The directing is fine, and the church-murder scene is a beautiful mix of sound and picture. Lorre is much like the male version of Bette Davis - overacting and proud of it. His role as the womanizing yet clever "General" is much lighter than his usual horror-laced stuff, and he still pulls it off with ease. The leads are equally good. And the humor laced throughout is genuinely funny. (Note that, even in 1936, it is obvious that Hitchcock was already looking for the actress that would be fulfilled in Grace Kelly - the strong, feisty, beautiful blonde leading lady.)
But there's nothing here to just make the jaw drop and the eyes widen. It is a good movie, and from a director that has had whole decades worth of *great* movies, it just seems subpar. A previous commentor was right: This was the movie for Hitchcock to remake in the 1950s (with color and Cary Grant and Grace Kelly - heck, maybe even a minor role for Jimmy Stewart), not The Man Who Knew Too Much, which was one of his best British films.
Overall, it is good and worth the watch - especially for Hitchcock fans, but it's just not quite *there*.
7/10
This enjoyable picture blends action , a love story , comedy , adventures , thriller , suspense and results to be quite entertaining . Hitchcock said about this film being well developed in Switzerland , it's plenty of typical elements , such as : folkloric dances , Swiss Alps , lagoons and a chocolate factory . Alfred Hitchcock convinced John Gielgud to play the lead by describing the hero as a modern day Hamlet ; Gielgud, however, ended up hating that his character was an enigma and felt Hitchcock made the villain more charming than the hero . Besides , it contains the usual Hitch's touches and the elegant as well as intelligent baddie (repeating in posterior films as James Mason at ¨North by Northwest¨) , the enticing blonde (as later happened with Grace Kelly and Kim Novak) , the filming on the train (a very agreeable vehicle for the director) . It's an uneven movie and Hitch wasn't proud but it had excessive irony as he said in the famous interview with Francois Truffaut . Rating : Good , well worth watching . The motion picture will appeal to Hitchcock fans . Essential and indispensable seeing for Hitch lovers .
It's interesting to see Gielgud in a leading role, although it's quickly evident why it didn't happen more often. He lacks any romantic chemistry with Carroll, and he frequently seems bored by the proceedings. Carroll and Young both do well with under-thought characters, but Lorre easily steals the picture as the strange assassin with a morbid sense of humor and indeterminate ethnicity.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesSir Alfred Hitchcock convinced Sir John Gielgud to play the lead by describing the hero as a modern-day Hamlet. Gielgud, however, ended up hating that his character was an enigma.
- PatzerAlthough the film is set in 1916, fashion, hairstyles and set decoration are contemporary to 1936.
- Zitate
Mrs. Caypor: Do you understand German, Mr. Marvin?
Robert Marvin: Not a word -- but I speak it fluently.
- VerbindungenFeatured in Alfred Hitchcock: More Than Just a Profile (2005)
Top-Auswahl
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsland
- Sprachen
- Auch bekannt als
- Secret Agent
- Drehorte
- Produktionsfirma
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
Box Office
- Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
- 605 $
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 26 Minuten
- Farbe
- Seitenverhältnis
- 1.37 : 1