Monte Carlo Nights

Not more though, not more. It is kind of comedy, thriller, hesitating between several tendancies in the script, as so many features from the thirties. It is not a bad, lousy movie but on the contrary worth seeing. One part takes place in the South Of France, French Riviera, which brings a specific touch, charm to which many audiences can't be insensitive. The topic itself is predictable, nothing, so don't expect much from this side. William Nigh was a important director during the silent period and a bit less when the talkies emerged. He was a prolific film maker and for gem diggers his filmography is interesting, no matter the stories.

For an hour-long programmer, the flick's not bad. The plot's pretty familiar. A guy gets accused of a murder he didn't commit and now has to track down the real killer, using a roulette-wheel combination as a clue. Good thing others want to help.

For former Saturday matinee kids, like this now geezer, the real magnet is Gabby Hayes with his teeth in and no whiskers and playing a big-time cop, no less. I was fascinated, to say the least, after so many years laughing at his goofy sidekick to Roy Rogers, Hopalong Cassidy, et al. Here, he shows a versatility I would never have expected. Also, it's an excellent cast for a cheapo, with a bevy of lovely ladies, along with a leading man, Darrow, who bears a strong facial resemblance to Marlon Brando - see what you think.

All in all, the minor flick holds interest though doesn't generate much suspense, the identity of the real killer being a rather minor point. At the same time, actress Bryan does make the romantic angle work pretty well. And catch those head-hugging cloche hats fashionable ladies wore at the time. I'd like to see them make a comeback. Anyway, give the flick a try. It's a good way to pass a leisurely hour.

A man found guilty of a murder he didn't commit, a daring escape by leaping off a train crossing a bridge, a shooting in a café and a scrap of paper that leads to a denouement in Monte Carlo --- these are the plot points that tell you you're watching a great Hitchcockian thriller. Only it isn't a Hitchcock picture, it's directed by William Nigh for Monogram and it is pretty poor -- especially as we've seen Hitchcock do it right, starting a year later with THE 39 STEPS. Really, the main reason to see this movie is to serve as counterpoint to Hitchcock.

Even the sound system seems off. Everyone speaks their lines with great emphasis as if every article is of great importance. There are some good actors lurking here, including gorgeous Mary Bryan, Astrid Allwyn and George 'Gabby' Hayes, clean-shaven, hair neatly combed and his teeth in. But really, you'd do yourself a favor by giving this one a miss.

When the film begins, the rich playboy Larry (John Darrow) finds himself engaged to two women--one who is a gold-digger and another, Mary (Mary Brian), who is kind of sweet. Larry manages to shake loose the gold-digger but just when it looks as if the marriage will go off without a hitch, Larry is in the wrong place at the wrong time and the police think he killed someone! He's sentenced to 10 years in prison--a wonderful way to spend his wedding night! However, there is a LOT more to the story than this. There is a clue that the real killer is a guy who is obsessed with playing a bizarre little system for roulette--and when Larry manages to escape from the train taking him to prison, he begins to investigate on his own! And this is only the beginning....see the film and you'll see what I mean.

The plot to this film is wildly improbable and the actors are mostly unknowns. Additionally, the film is obviously a cheap B-movie with very modest pretenses. BUT, despite all this, it IS entertaining and well made. If you don't spend too much time thinking through the plot, it is quite fun and worth seeing. A better than average B-mystery, that's for sure.

This movie is not that bad, a decent time waster if you don't mind watching old black and white movies. I think most of the negative comments are coming from people who just don't like old black and white movies or they are expecting them all to be as good as Hitchcock, to that reviewer I say you are right it's not as good as any Hitchcock film but it is still a decent enough way to spend a couple hours.

It's a mystery film noir type movie where the main character is accused of murder but escapes and strives to hunt down the real killer on his own to get revenge but also obviously to prove that he is innocent of the crime he has been accused of. The actor playing the main character gives a good performance and so does the actress in the main female role.