Zwei kriminelle Zwillingsbrüder, von denen einer versucht, sich zu bessern, begeben sich auf einen gefährlichen Raubüberfall. Sie haben mit rechtlichen Problemen, Schießereien und Familiendr... Alles lesenZwei kriminelle Zwillingsbrüder, von denen einer versucht, sich zu bessern, begeben sich auf einen gefährlichen Raubüberfall. Sie haben mit rechtlichen Problemen, Schießereien und Familiendramen zu kämpfen und müssen sich versöhnen.Zwei kriminelle Zwillingsbrüder, von denen einer versucht, sich zu bessern, begeben sich auf einen gefährlichen Raubüberfall. Sie haben mit rechtlichen Problemen, Schießereien und Familiendramen zu kämpfen und müssen sich versöhnen.
- Auszeichnungen
- 1 Nominierung insgesamt
Jen Landon
- Young Cath
- (as Jennifer Landon)
Andrew Joseph Brodeur
- Avery Jacobson
- (as Andrew Brodeur)
Margo Moorer
- Mrs. Jacobson
- (as Margo Williams Moorer)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
So many issues with this movie. Was everyone in this just bored and couldn't get another job, so they lowered themselves to do this? Every one of the actors in this movie are legendary in their own right, but this movie? They just proved that no matter how good of an actor you are, a bad script, bad directing, and low budget can cause great actors to be bad actors.
This movie was almost cartoonish and presented itself as if a child wrote it.
I'm all for silly and mindless comedies ... if they're funny. This movie was not funny. It was definitely mindless and barely cut the mustard at being silly. It was more absurd and overly exaggerated than anything else.
This movie was almost cartoonish and presented itself as if a child wrote it.
I'm all for silly and mindless comedies ... if they're funny. This movie was not funny. It was definitely mindless and barely cut the mustard at being silly. It was more absurd and overly exaggerated than anything else.
The biggest drawback of the film was simple: many of the characters in this film are hyper-exaggerated to the point where you can't take them seriously.
For example, Brendan Fraser, despite being a Hollywood icon with some seriously wonderful films under his belt, was maddening in this. His character had a cartoonish, over-the-top, somewhat childish behavior scheme that just wasn't believable.
I blame this misstep on the man setting the film's tone, director Max Barbakow. This was a massive step backwards from his most recent film "Palm Springs" which was quite enjoyable.
The relationship between Brolin and Dinklage, our titular "brothers," felt forced and, at times, dull throughout the film. Their arguments felt scripted, which is the exact opposite of what you want to feel in a film. I was never invested in their familial development because the writing never evoked those feelings with the audience. In short, the lackluster writing was only exacerbated by the sluggish on-screen chemistry.
It might be worth the watch if you've run through the many streaming catalogs available but shouldn't be at the top of your to-do list.
4/10.
For example, Brendan Fraser, despite being a Hollywood icon with some seriously wonderful films under his belt, was maddening in this. His character had a cartoonish, over-the-top, somewhat childish behavior scheme that just wasn't believable.
I blame this misstep on the man setting the film's tone, director Max Barbakow. This was a massive step backwards from his most recent film "Palm Springs" which was quite enjoyable.
The relationship between Brolin and Dinklage, our titular "brothers," felt forced and, at times, dull throughout the film. Their arguments felt scripted, which is the exact opposite of what you want to feel in a film. I was never invested in their familial development because the writing never evoked those feelings with the audience. In short, the lackluster writing was only exacerbated by the sluggish on-screen chemistry.
It might be worth the watch if you've run through the many streaming catalogs available but shouldn't be at the top of your to-do list.
4/10.
With a kind of stacked cast people might've expected a lot more from this movie. I don't believe they thought they made a masterpiece, moreso just a fun loving action comedy. If you aren't judging as a critic and just as a general viewing experience I feel like it was definitely above average these days. Parts were cheesy and crude but in almost an early 2000s feel. I found it to be an easy watch and enjoyed the performances of the actors involved. I can understand the disappointment some people may have with this movie. Some parts are a bit formulaic. I definitely think it's not meant to be art(film) but just a movie(entertainment). Which is perfectly okay, because as much as people want great films there's many people who just want to sit down and watch an entertaining movie.
Many of the most negative reviews that have been posted here have the same keywords, the same key phrases, and criticize the same talking points, as if a single person wrote multiple reviews as a personal vendetta, for whatever reason. This movie is actually pretty enjoyable. It's an intentionally mindless farce comedy with some original ideas, great character actors, and novel plot twists. Peter Dinklage and Josh Brolin have natural chemistry and great dialogue to work with. Perhaps they were allowed to improvise some of their exchanges. Brendan Fraser plays his character perfectly, note for note, and seems to be having a great time. M. Emmet Walsh appears in a few scenes, just long enough to remind people that he is a king of character actors. It's a mindless comedy that is intentionally ridiculous, and it works.
It's an amusing heist film and has a great cast. I don't get all the hate posted here. Yes, I've seen better movies, but I've surely seen a lot worse movies. It's a fun romp. It's pretty much what it appears to be and nothing more. It won't win Oscars, but not every movie is meant to win Oscars. It's a fun little popcorn flick. The chemistry is good between the actors. It's interesting seeing some of the actors play against type. If you want to spend an afternoon relaxing with a fun movie that has some really good actors. This movie may be for you. I really don't see a reason to write a book here, but the App keeps insisting this needs to be longer. I really don't want to post spoilers.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesGlenn Close wears gloves in every scene. This is because in the original script, Close's character had cut the tips of her fingers off so she wouldn't leave fingerprints anywhere while down in Mexico. This detail was to have been revealed during the bar scene, but was cut from the final film.
- PatzerMoke is forced to masturbate Samuel, the ape, using his right hand. Shortly after runaway from the animal, Moke sniffs his left hand in disgust.
- VerbindungenReferenced in Film Junk Podcast: Episode 967: Here (2024)
- SoundtracksBeen Caught Stealing
Written by Eric Avery, Perry Farrell, Dave Navarro (as David Navarro) and Stephen Perkins
Performed by Jane's Addiction
Courtesy of Warner Records
By arrangement with Warner Music Group Film & TV Licensing
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is Brothers?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Laufzeit
- 1 Std. 29 Min.(89 min)
- Farbe
- Seitenverhältnis
- 1.85 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen