Natural Disasters

I think for this day in age, it's a very good movie. And has relatable moments that happen in real life. Acting was alright but I would point more towards the story and relatability.

Appetizer for others, thoughtprovoking for a religious fanatic, and maybe tantalizing stuff without calling it heavy eroticized, no bare upper or nether parts exposed, its the 3 young ladies confessions around the bon fire, about how to beat the bush and how to eat or wack the sneaking snake in the garden of hedon.

Acting is fairly natural not outragously good but quite harmless sexy, occationally the story is boring and might feel gross for some, and the plot speed is extremely slow, but some fantasy tips youll get, and the talking by the fence can be vigourous and might strike a match of volcanic heat among some viewers.

Productionwise it has an outrageously bad sound quality, its not a minor flaw, just a big livin in a box auditorial mess all the way through the film, and its very bouncing plotwise. Score is quite irrelevant due to very small amounts of it.

So its not a pornographic, rather a thoughtprovoking erotional cabaret that will taste well at your next womens getogether or''klubb/forening'' in norwegian, but thats entirely the thoughts of a grumpy old man.

Unless you find fascination in endless discussions by dull, mediocre-looking young women about such thought provoking topics as ingesting a certain body fluid, there's just no reason to watch this slow moving, indulgent nonsense. Not even after they changed the misleading title (from Natural Disasters) before it hit streaming platforms to the equally misleading but even less clever clickbait label: All About Sex. Though it's rated for ages 18+ there's no actual nudity and the simulated, fake sex is less interesting than the new title of this ludicrous mess. It's just more junk about young women whose lives revolve around the men in them. I would have thought by this point in modern cinema we would be past the notion that a woman is nothing without a man in her life. These dippy whiners didn't get the memo.

The unknown actors are minimally talented, and the characters all less than interesting. The only thing worse than the two titles, the stupid and graphic conversations, the idiotic plot, and the dry humping with most of their clothes still on, is the writing. There seems to be a dearth of good writers because there is a lot of terrible junk like this that gets made these days. They have definitely scraped the bottom of the barrel for untalented writers who can regurgitate unoriginal, boring tripe like this. Why was this even made?

One should think that since Sex and the City there should not be any male existing being surprised that women talk about sex. And that they enjoy (sometimes) and like to gossip a bit about their own lifes and the lives of others.

That being said, would I say that the characters in the movie always act in their best interest? No. But do the circumstances allow for them to go ... all out? Act a fool as some might also say. I would argue there is enough sentiment for them to be angry and irrational (as some would put it).

No one does always the right thing or the best thing or whatever you would call it. The performances are good - which is really something that is needed with a talky movie like the one at hand here. You may not like the subject matter - you may not be able to identify with our main characters either ... but they feel three dimensional. They feel like they are well written - and they feel like the actors got into their skin - no pun intended.

Title stated what I feel. Little long and just weak version of the famous TV series. But it's not too bad just similarity with S&C makes me compare.