Eye Without a Face

This is one of those made for IFC TV movies. Recommended on Amazon and I have no clue why. It was bad.

About some guy who likes to watch women eat fruit on the internet. Bizarrely written and just pointless.

And IMDB seems to have added a large amount of required characters now in order to post a review. I'm sure they'll reverse this decision at some point because I'm sure a lot of people will be annoyed by it and complain. It really doesn't make a lot of sense.

Just like this non-entertaining movie!!!!

This is definitely one you can skip. I would give it a score now but I still have a few characters left!

Okay now is the time. 3/10.

A shy young male recluse with a live-in male tenant finds relief in illegal all-day digital voyeurism. Eventually he suspects one of the beautiful young women he spies on of cannibalism. His gregarious actor tenant encourages him to come out of his shell, but that turns out to be the worst possible advice.

This might have been a much better movie had the film makers been allotted another half hour of running time and not felt obliged to wrap things up so precipitously. As it is, the film is nonetheless entertaining enough - thanks in large part to the protagonist's delectable objects of solicitude/desire. It makes no claim to be a cautionary tale, as voyeurism is its ultimate selling point.

Seems the film. Is divisive which is interesting.

To me the film clearly effectively critiques incel culture and on line voyeurism in a genre context which I find very interesting and which some people do not seem to get . The lead Henry is clearly suffering from trauma and is portrayed as vulnerable but he is still an A 1 creep - I think Dakota Shapiro walks that tightrope really effectively and the score by Charlie Clouser keeps us unsettled throughout. The character played amusingly by Luke Cook is a real doofus and to some extent an exemplar of toxic masculinity but he also touches notes of real empathy with Henry . I think it is entertaining and effective .

Watching this movie was very boring due to the predictability of the script.

Gimme a break, 3.5? At least solid 7. May be predictable, but still greatly executed!

Acting was great too, camera angles also.

Don't trust the 1 star reviews.