Battlefield V

The game is low on content with very little maps, the game throws away historical accuracy even though it was marketed as a realistic ww2 game. The devs promised consistent updates with new content and almost a year has went by with barely any new content brought into the game. The single player is also a lazy attempt at pleasing the campaign audience. They ruined the chance to make a good ww2, in-depth story by breaking it into "war stories" which are mini campaigns taking place in different battles and different perspectives. The short amount of time each war story takes does not give enough room for character development and does not have any good action set pieces and is basically a gallery shooter of killing multiples enemies at once, than moving on. Would not recommend this game to anyone even if you are, like myself, a huge battlefield fan.

Singleplayer Plot:

My Country Calling:

The prologue, following Battlefield 1's "Storm of Steel," comments on society's quick forgetfulness of the horrors of World War I. Serving as a tutorial, it introduces players to basic mechanics and sets the tone for war stories. Spanning various locations and characters, it starts with a British paratrooper in Narvik, a German tank commander in Tobruk, a Free French sniper at Kasserine Pass, a Bf 109 pilot in the Bombing of Hamburg, and a British machine gunner in the Final Defense at Nijmegen railway bridge.

War Stories: Under No Flag:

Set in 1942 during the North African campaign, the story follows William Sidney "Billy" Bridger, a convicted bank robber conscripted by the British army. He, along with George Mason, infiltrates North Africa to sabotage German airfields. Depicting the first SBS Operations in Libya and as part of the upcoming Operation Albumen.

Nordlys:

In 1943 during Operation Checkmate in Rjukan, Norway, the story revolves around Astrid, a Norwegian resistance soldier, and her daughter Solveig. A British commando unit, accompanied by Astrid, attempts to sabotage a German-occupied facility producing heavy water for nuclear research.

Tirailleur:

Set in 1944 after the Normandy landings, Senegalese Tirailleurs soldiers, including Deme Cisse and his older brother Idrissa, face discrimination from the French army. The story follows their struggle to gain recognition, culminating in a daring assault on a German position. Despite success, the Senegalese soldiers are forgotten, and Deme recounts the story in the present, expressing pride in their actions.

The Last Tiger:

In April 1945 during the encirclement of German Army Group B, veteran Tiger I commander Peter Müller and his crew defend the Ruhr against American forces. The narrative explores the crew's loyalty, disillusionment, and their ultimate fate.

Negative Aspects:

EA's venture into open-world gaming results in the opposing military in the game lacking situational awareness and communication. Actions like destroying a large enemy radar less than 1 km in direct view of an airfield do not trigger an alert at the airfield. This contributes to an overall more 'arcadey' tone, worsening the series' emphasis on the player and a small team winning the war, rather than a combined arms effort. This is somewhat countered by having multiple campaigns, as in BF1, but with the exception of "Tirraileur," you almost have no friendlies.

The anachronistic use of gear and optics is evident. The first reflex sight for a portable weapon, the Nydar, was patented and released in late September 1945, after the war had already ended. It was designed for hunting shotguns, was relatively expensive, somewhat fragile, and never gained widespread popularity.

Enemies in Battlefield 5 drop Universal Ammo, so you never worry about weapon/ammo compatibility.

Medics can revive enemies, even with HE shots to the head.

Positive Aspects:

Graphics.

Joke at the end of the first campaign.

All characters speak in their native language, with subtitles provided for the non-English speaking campaigns.

War Story "Tiralleur" tackles a point almost no one dares to speak of.

War Story about the German perspective.

I'm a big fan of Battlefield franchise. Here's the Pros and Cons in this game.

Pros: The music and the graphics THAT IS IT.

Cons:

• Single-player campaign

.Too short and so damn boring, AIs are so dumb, doesn't feel like playing "Battlefield", there's no "Battlefield" moment at all. stealth kills over and over again (I'd rather play FarCry series than this garbage)

• Multiplayer

.TTK/TTD is ridiculously fast, thus so many freaking campers everywhere. .No 3D spotting system which really sucks, because the visibility in this game is bad and It's so hard to see enemies. .Can't hear enemy footsteps even though using headphones. .Medic class is a joke, why only useless SMG? .The physics are terrible, The developers should take notes from Red Dead Redemption 2's ragdoll physics. .The maps are worse than BF1, I got bored of them pretty quickly. .Women scream like damn pigs, really annoying (actually kinda funny) ."PRACTICE RANGE" is not even available at launch... Are they stupid?

I am so regretting that I paid $60 for this trash on PSstore. The most disappointing game of 2018. Black Ops 4 is far better.

Battlefield is a series that I got into when playing the 4th installment and I have always liked the gameplay presented. However, here, Battlefield remains kind of the same in comparison to Battlefield 1 with not many innovations. This is not necessarily a bad thing because the multiplayer remains easy to hop in and to have fun for some matches. Where I found Battlefield V to be lacking is in the campaign. The stories told are pretty interesting because they tell stories of the Second World War that are not often highlighted in media and I was genuinely interested in them. Where it falls flat here is the gameplay design (and especially on higher difficulties). The levels first start out with some stealth which does not work well on higher difficulties since you basically cannot sneak past them without them noticing you even if you just try to look around a corner to see if there are enemies at all. And at the end you get this big map where you basically do the same but now you need to travel between long distances. The last two war stories did try to mix it up a bit but this was still lackluster since it then became your standard first person shooter affaire. Overall, I think that Battlefield V is not a bad game, but that it definitely needs some changes in its campaign (especially the design) to convey these stories better. I hope that the next Battlefield I play is going to innovate more and that it does not solely rely on its multiplayer because in my opinion this only stays fun for some casual games.

BfV is a huge step down from its predecessor Bf1, taking a more Cartoonish and historically literate approach to war.

Battlefield 1 overall feels like a more polished version of BfV. Griddy violence, chaotic atmosphere, thematic uniforms, no silly cosmetics, Fortnite skins, and clunky gimmicks.

Bf1's warstoies are more meaningful and intriguing than BFV's quirky "happy-go-lucky" adventure-like campaign. 'The Last Tiger' is the only warstory that felt meaningful to me.

The game was awful at launch, and was until 'War in The Pacific launched'. WITP is what BF fans wanted, not a steampunk-looking British woman with a prosthetic arm.