IMDb-BEWERTUNG
6,3/10
27.566
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Nach ihrer Flucht von Tweedys Farm hat Ginger eine friedliche Insel als Zufluchtsort für die ganze Herde gefunden. Doch zurück auf dem Festland sieht sich die gesamte Hühnerschar einer neuen... Alles lesenNach ihrer Flucht von Tweedys Farm hat Ginger eine friedliche Insel als Zufluchtsort für die ganze Herde gefunden. Doch zurück auf dem Festland sieht sich die gesamte Hühnerschar einer neuen Bedrohung gegenüber.Nach ihrer Flucht von Tweedys Farm hat Ginger eine friedliche Insel als Zufluchtsort für die ganze Herde gefunden. Doch zurück auf dem Festland sieht sich die gesamte Hühnerschar einer neuen Bedrohung gegenüber.
- Nominiert für 1 BAFTA Award
- 1 Gewinn & 9 Nominierungen insgesamt
Thandiwe Newton
- Ginger
- (Synchronisation)
Zachary Levi
- Rocky
- (Synchronisation)
Bella Ramsey
- Molly
- (Synchronisation)
Imelda Staunton
- Bunty
- (Synchronisation)
Lynn Ferguson
- Mac
- (Synchronisation)
David Bradley
- Fowler
- (Synchronisation)
Jane Horrocks
- Babs
- (Synchronisation)
Romesh Ranganathan
- Nick
- (Synchronisation)
Daniel Mays
- Fetcher
- (Synchronisation)
Josie Sedgwick-Davies
- Frizzle
- (Synchronisation)
Peter Serafinowicz
- Reginald Smith
- (Synchronisation)
Nick Mohammed
- Dr. Fry
- (Synchronisation)
Miranda Richardson
- Mrs. Tweedy
- (Synchronisation)
Julia Sawalha
- Ginger
- (Synchronisation)
- …
David Brooks
- Burly Guard
- (Synchronisation)
Dan Williamson
- Van Driver
- (Synchronisation)
Tom Doggart
- 2D Narrator
- (Synchronisation)
- …
Sam Fell
- 2D Animated Boy
- (Synchronisation)
- …
Empfohlene Bewertungen
There are some prequels or sequels that no one asked for, but end up being happy that they happened anyway.
This sadly isn't one one of them.
I was already upset by the fact that many of the core voice actors were being replaced. Mel Gibson I could understand for obvious reasons, but the excuse for Julie Sawalha's exclusion was not acceptable. I do believe the real reason was because Sawalha is no longer famous, while Thandi (or Thandiwe) Newton, her replacement, is a big name in the industry. This is a growing trend in modern animation where famous actors are favoured to voice cartoon characters rather than actual voice actors.
At one point Ginger fearfully says "that voice!" before the reveal of the return of Mrs Tweedy. It would have been extremely awkward if Miranda Richardson was no longer voicing the villain.
The story itself is a little too similar to the first Chicken Run and the animation looks too shiny and CGIed, despite most of it being clay-animation. The stakes were not really as high, and the characters were not as fleshed out as they were in the first film.
My favourite character is still Fowler, as he was still hilarious. And unlike the new voices for the other main characters, David Bradley does a great job here.
The humour in the first film was intelligent and witty. But despite most of the film still being proudly British (even including a chicken character with a Scouse accent) , the magic and the passion found in the first film has dampened down quite a lot here.
Kids will no doubt enjoy it. But after 23 years, I wasn't all that impressed.
This sadly isn't one one of them.
I was already upset by the fact that many of the core voice actors were being replaced. Mel Gibson I could understand for obvious reasons, but the excuse for Julie Sawalha's exclusion was not acceptable. I do believe the real reason was because Sawalha is no longer famous, while Thandi (or Thandiwe) Newton, her replacement, is a big name in the industry. This is a growing trend in modern animation where famous actors are favoured to voice cartoon characters rather than actual voice actors.
At one point Ginger fearfully says "that voice!" before the reveal of the return of Mrs Tweedy. It would have been extremely awkward if Miranda Richardson was no longer voicing the villain.
The story itself is a little too similar to the first Chicken Run and the animation looks too shiny and CGIed, despite most of it being clay-animation. The stakes were not really as high, and the characters were not as fleshed out as they were in the first film.
My favourite character is still Fowler, as he was still hilarious. And unlike the new voices for the other main characters, David Bradley does a great job here.
The humour in the first film was intelligent and witty. But despite most of the film still being proudly British (even including a chicken character with a Scouse accent) , the magic and the passion found in the first film has dampened down quite a lot here.
Kids will no doubt enjoy it. But after 23 years, I wasn't all that impressed.
Not as good as the first one as the setting is a lot more fantastical and silly, but it still has the Aardman charm and style with goofy looking characters and inventive contraptions. The plot clearly shows its inspiration from classic films and whilst being a bit too long, it has lots of humour, jokes and wacky adventures to keep it entertaining. The different voice actors aren't as good and the modern pop song at the start felt out of place, but the animation is great (if less hand-made) and full of vibrant colours and it has those little touches which make it something special.
Overall score = 7/10.
Overall score = 7/10.
After watching this movie during the day on Christmas Eve with my Mum, Dad and my brother Jordy for lunch here's my spoiler-free review of Chicken Run: Dawn of the Nugget! As usual, I'll be talking about my thoughts, my favourite moments & comparing the other Aardman shorts and my conclusion/rating! After the 2000s original Chicken Run, we finally have a sequel all of it was claymation but there was one that wasn't! A lot of cast members from the original did not return some were recast but the voice cast that did come back were Jane Horrocks as Babs, Imelda Staunton as Bunty, Lynn Ferguson as Mac & a surprise return was Miranda Richardson as Mrs Tweedy! I waited this long to write my review so I can be honest about it earlier in 2023 I wrote a spoiler-free review for Star Wars: Visions Vol. II Episode IV: I Am Your Mother which I enjoyed very much! Comparing this to Star Wars, Early Man, Shaun the Sheep and Wallace & Gromit (which is finally getting a new film after we lost Peter Sallis back in 2017 6 years ago) it's not as good as the previous instalment! Overall I'm sure kids will enjoy this and I look forward to seeing what Aardman does next! That's why I gave this a 6/10! Go check out the other mini-movies while you wait for more & I'm certain that you, your kids and the whole family will be entertained by them! ;-)
The stop motion is always on point. Impressive, when you think about how much time goes into it.
If you work really hard, you can probably scrape together some respect for the production, but that might be the only feeling you can evoke. The voice acting isn't great, and not just because the original actors are missing. There's a strange disconnect between the animation and the acting, it feels insincere and forced.
The story is nothing new, and it should have been. It should have broke new ground just as the original did. It really feels like they put no effort into creating an original plot and just clung to the coat tales of the first film. Seems like a bad choice.
I want to write something positive about it but I don't really know what that could be. I guess Bella Ramsey was good casting. I'm only giving it 5 stars because I appreciate the time it takes to make stop motion.
If you work really hard, you can probably scrape together some respect for the production, but that might be the only feeling you can evoke. The voice acting isn't great, and not just because the original actors are missing. There's a strange disconnect between the animation and the acting, it feels insincere and forced.
The story is nothing new, and it should have been. It should have broke new ground just as the original did. It really feels like they put no effort into creating an original plot and just clung to the coat tales of the first film. Seems like a bad choice.
I want to write something positive about it but I don't really know what that could be. I guess Bella Ramsey was good casting. I'm only giving it 5 stars because I appreciate the time it takes to make stop motion.
Aardman Animations, personally, is a hit or miss for me as in the past, they have created some great works like Wallace & Gromit, Shaun the Sheep and so forth. But at the same time, they have made some pretty mediocre or pretty bad works too. "Chicken Run" is one of my favorite stop-motion movies as I really like the characters, the animation, and the narrative. With this sequel coming out after many years, it was entertaining but it was a bit underwhelming.
Throughout, the stop-motion animation, character models, and colors are amazing as Aardman continues to provide great clay animation. Aardman always provides some great animation and the models, colors, sound designs, and the movements are all excellent. We get to see the same characters from the previous movie and it was fun to see them communicate, move around and observe their actions throughout. The voice performances from the cast members were solid as they provided some good voice works, although a few voice performances weren't great. The soundtrack is pretty good and there are some decent humor moments that I chuckled at.
With the narrative continuing from the previous movie, the narrative explores some new concepts and territories within the setting and characters and there are some aspects that were interesting but some not so much. Certain new concepts that were explored I felt weren't strong enough and at times, it really feels like a rehash of the first movie. On the characters, there are new characters that are introduced but unfortunately, none of the new characters weren't really interesting since they felt a bit dull and kind of annoying at times. Because this is a new cast, I personally felt while the original characters are still fun, the chemistry and energy of what made them fun from the first movie felt a bit lacking. The soundtrack is okay and there are some solid dialogue moments while being a bit clunky.
Despite my gripes, I still was interested to see where the movie goes and for what it is, it's a decent sequel. Overall, it is entertaining and it's nice to see the characters again, but I wish it could have been better.
Throughout, the stop-motion animation, character models, and colors are amazing as Aardman continues to provide great clay animation. Aardman always provides some great animation and the models, colors, sound designs, and the movements are all excellent. We get to see the same characters from the previous movie and it was fun to see them communicate, move around and observe their actions throughout. The voice performances from the cast members were solid as they provided some good voice works, although a few voice performances weren't great. The soundtrack is pretty good and there are some decent humor moments that I chuckled at.
With the narrative continuing from the previous movie, the narrative explores some new concepts and territories within the setting and characters and there are some aspects that were interesting but some not so much. Certain new concepts that were explored I felt weren't strong enough and at times, it really feels like a rehash of the first movie. On the characters, there are new characters that are introduced but unfortunately, none of the new characters weren't really interesting since they felt a bit dull and kind of annoying at times. Because this is a new cast, I personally felt while the original characters are still fun, the chemistry and energy of what made them fun from the first movie felt a bit lacking. The soundtrack is okay and there are some solid dialogue moments while being a bit clunky.
Despite my gripes, I still was interested to see where the movie goes and for what it is, it's a decent sequel. Overall, it is entertaining and it's nice to see the characters again, but I wish it could have been better.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesIf viewed closely during the film's final shot, an imposter chicken in the form of the nefarious penguin Feathers McGraw from the second Wallace & Gromit short, "Wrong Trousers," can be seen.
- PatzerDespite being remarried, Melisha still goes by the name 'Mrs Tweedy'. As made clear in the first film, this is her married name that she got from her previous husband as opposed to being a maiden name. However, some women keep their previous surname when they marry or re-marry.
- Crazy CreditsThere is an image of two chickens in collars with happy faces riding a sky glider behind the duration of the credits until the "Songs" section where it fades to black.
- VerbindungenFeatured in AniMat's Crazy Cartoon Cast: Ginger Snapped (2020)
- SoundtracksMy Sweet Baby
Written by Josh Crocker, John Crocker and Charlotte Jane
Produced by Josh Crocker
Paloma Faith appears courtesy of RCA Records/Sony Music UK
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is Chicken Run: Dawn of the Nugget?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsländer
- Offizielle Standorte
- Sprache
- Auch bekannt als
- Pollitos en fuga: El origen de los nuggets
- Produktionsfirmen
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
- Laufzeit
- 1 Std. 38 Min.(98 min)
- Farbe
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen