IMDb-BEWERTUNG
5,0/10
2793
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Der Film folgt dem Hacker Connor, seinem besten Freund Avi und einer gerissenen Bibliothekarin, die überfordert sind, als sie in einem ausgeklügelten globalen Rekrutierungsspiel eines Geheim... Alles lesenDer Film folgt dem Hacker Connor, seinem besten Freund Avi und einer gerissenen Bibliothekarin, die überfordert sind, als sie in einem ausgeklügelten globalen Rekrutierungsspiel eines Geheimbundes im Dark Web antreten müssen.Der Film folgt dem Hacker Connor, seinem besten Freund Avi und einer gerissenen Bibliothekarin, die überfordert sind, als sie in einem ausgeklügelten globalen Rekrutierungsspiel eines Geheimbundes im Dark Web antreten müssen.
- Regie
- Drehbuch
- Hauptbesetzung
Empfohlene Bewertungen
Not sure why actor Alan Ritchson turned producer, writer and director - also cast in his own film, decided to make this film into a parody-type childish humor production. It was riddled with plot and technical issues, long dragged out and unnecessary scenes, and lots of ridiculous eye candy that was too much filler for the little substance this film had.
Even though the pacing was decent, the 104 min runtime felt much longer and the too much useless blah blah dialogue made it even that much more annoying. This film needed shorter to-the-point scenes and at least 20 mins cut out of the runtime. The story-telling theme started off OK, but then became infantile once the actors started acting like children. Had Ritchson added an actual treasure map and cast Nicholas Cage, I may have enjoyed it more.
The humor was very lame, cheesy and forced, and only provided a few giggles, thanks in part to Ron Funches' funny demeanor. The casting and acting was actually decent, as were the visuals and set pieces. The score was on point as was the cinematography. I just wish the story took a more serious approach instead of the tween target audience theme, it could've been a hit. Nevertheless, it was a decent production from a newb filmmaker.
Even though the pacing was decent, the 104 min runtime felt much longer and the too much useless blah blah dialogue made it even that much more annoying. This film needed shorter to-the-point scenes and at least 20 mins cut out of the runtime. The story-telling theme started off OK, but then became infantile once the actors started acting like children. Had Ritchson added an actual treasure map and cast Nicholas Cage, I may have enjoyed it more.
The humor was very lame, cheesy and forced, and only provided a few giggles, thanks in part to Ron Funches' funny demeanor. The casting and acting was actually decent, as were the visuals and set pieces. The score was on point as was the cinematography. I just wish the story took a more serious approach instead of the tween target audience theme, it could've been a hit. Nevertheless, it was a decent production from a newb filmmaker.
Maybe, maybe not, who knows. But I had a blast watching this and ripping into it. I'm pretty sure everyone is in on the joke while making it and just went for it. Ron is great and some parts make no sense and I swear they themselves even point it out sometimes. If you can find a copy for cheap or streaming somewhere eventually, I'd 'highly' recommend it with some friends and drinks and anything else you use to have fun.
Dark Web Cicada 3301 has a very interesting story; some well defined (but not totally) characters and decent acting / charisma.
The story is told (in comedy mode) by a very unreliable narrator that makes some things funny but others difficult to understand or unexplained.
The unexplained/unresolved situations conspire with the logic in the third act; but the surprising ending kinda restore it.
The movie was made with a limited budget; so action scenes are scarce but some technical knowledge was applied to the script making the computer scenes and the puzzles believable .
In brief; if you like techno thrillers is really a good watch; with good and not PC ending.
The story is told (in comedy mode) by a very unreliable narrator that makes some things funny but others difficult to understand or unexplained.
The unexplained/unresolved situations conspire with the logic in the third act; but the surprising ending kinda restore it.
The movie was made with a limited budget; so action scenes are scarce but some technical knowledge was applied to the script making the computer scenes and the puzzles believable .
In brief; if you like techno thrillers is really a good watch; with good and not PC ending.
The characters here seem quite one dimensional, especially when it comes to the humor they create. I quite enjoy silly, though even for me it gets quite borderline at times. But the characters and the actors are doing a mighty fine job and it really translates to the screen. So I was a bit in the forgiving mood one could say (flaws and all that).
Of course the ending may kill the entire mood the movie created, on the other hand I'd argue the movie was really aiming for that ... it's not really entirely unexpected ... a bit of fun, nothing more and nothing less. Still offensive to some I can imagine.
Of course the ending may kill the entire mood the movie created, on the other hand I'd argue the movie was really aiming for that ... it's not really entirely unexpected ... a bit of fun, nothing more and nothing less. Still offensive to some I can imagine.
Entertaining for the first 45 minutes. The second half of the movie, not so much. It became a little strange and looked low budget, like they ran out of funding half way through filming. Nevertheless, the film wasn't bad. Not something I'd watch again but I wouldn't say it was a waste of time. 5 stars
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesCicada 3301 is a nickname given to an organization that on three occasions has posted a set of puzzles to recruit codebreakers from the public. The first internet puzzle started on January 4, 2012 on 4chan and ran for approximately one month. A second round began one year later on January 4, 2013, and then a third round following the confirmation of a fresh clue posted on Twitter on January 4, 2014. The stated intent was to recruit "intelligent individuals" by presenting a series of puzzles which were to be solved. No new puzzles were published on January 4, 2015. However, a new clue was posted on Twitter on January 5, 2016. In April 2017 a verified PGP-signed message was found: Beware false paths. Always verify PGP signature from 7A35090F. That message explicitly denies the validity of any unsigned puzzle, as recently as April 2017. The puzzles focused heavily on data security, cryptography, steganography, internet anonymity, and surveillance. It has been called "the most elaborate and mysterious puzzle of the internet age"and is listed as one of the "top 5 eeriest, unsolved mysteries of the internet," and much speculation exists as to its function. Many have speculated that the puzzles are a recruitment tool for the NSA, CIA, MI6, a "Masonic conspiracy" or a cyber mercenary group. Others have claimed Cicada 3301 is an alternate reality game. No company or individual has taken credit for it or attempted to monetize it, however.
- Crazy CreditsDuring the credits there is a follow up scene featuring the security guard and Agent Carver in the Rare books archive.
- VerbindungenFeatured in Weekend Express: Folge vom 9. Mai 2021 (2021)
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is Dark Web: Cicada 3301?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsland
- Sprache
- Auch bekannt als
- شبكة الويب المظلمة: سيكادا 3301
- Drehorte
- Toronto, Ontario, Kanada(location)
- Produktionsfirma
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
Box Office
- Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
- 10.637 $
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 44 Minuten
- Seitenverhältnis
- 2.00 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen
Oberste Lücke
What was the official certification given to Dark Web: Cicada 3301 (2021) in Canada?
Antwort