IMDb-BEWERTUNG
6,6/10
3213
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Ein Rechtsteam übernimmt Fälle mit unrechtmäßigen Verurteilungen.Ein Rechtsteam übernimmt Fälle mit unrechtmäßigen Verurteilungen.Ein Rechtsteam übernimmt Fälle mit unrechtmäßigen Verurteilungen.
Folgen durchsuchen
Empfohlene Bewertungen
I like it so far I hope it gets a chance to develop into something There are a lot of good story lines here to work with and give the actors a chance to settle in and there could be something great here but just 5 episodes I hope it gets a chance I have got to ep 9 and yes could be better but is ok I just think hope she puts the bad guy down a little AND for all who think it is political shut up it is a show go back to FB and spout off
The bit parts are the best acted parts. Unfortunately the main character over acts her part and drags her costars with her. Too many sarcastic and angry lines and there is no character development at all. Could be good if the director gets to work and the writers learn to edit - just too many quick and underdeveloped plots happening.
It's really great to see Kelsey Grammar back on network television. Love a good criminal justice story.
Injustice Defense Group in Chicago is a legal firm led by Madeline Scott (Rachelle Lefevre) who was herself falsely imprisoned. Her law partner Easy Boudreau (Russell Hornsby) exonerated her and her troubled brother Levi from their murder convictions. Ambitious D.A. Gore Bellows (Kelsey Grammer) was the prosecutor and is running for Attorney General on his way to the Governorship. He battles Madeline in court as more prisoners are exonerated. Bodie Quick (Vincent Kartheiser) is the investigator and Violet Bell (Nikki M. James) is the assistant/podcaster.
The show pushes the agenda way too hard. Stylistically, the podcast is too preachy. Substantively, the cases should be less black and white. The show needs finesse. The main saving grace is Grammer. He delivers evil with a small e. I like that it's more ambition and arrogance rather than viciousness. The Madeline side is fine but it could do with more questions about her actual guilt. Her innocence is so absolute so that it lacks the tension of a mystery. Even the reveal of the killer is obvious from five episodes away. There is no subtlety in the writing at all. Otherwise, it's compelling enough until the last episode.
The show pushes the agenda way too hard. Stylistically, the podcast is too preachy. Substantively, the cases should be less black and white. The show needs finesse. The main saving grace is Grammer. He delivers evil with a small e. I like that it's more ambition and arrogance rather than viciousness. The Madeline side is fine but it could do with more questions about her actual guilt. Her innocence is so absolute so that it lacks the tension of a mystery. Even the reveal of the killer is obvious from five episodes away. There is no subtlety in the writing at all. Otherwise, it's compelling enough until the last episode.
The show is good not great, but it is a TV show, it is there for entertainment and for that it does it's job. I am so glad I don't live in America where every thing is analysed for political reasons and nothing is taken on face value, must be a really tough way to live your life.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesAlle Einträge enthalten Spoiler
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How many seasons does Proven Innocent have?Powered by Alexa
Details
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen