True Conviction

I fail to understand why she is 'hosting' this series. the cases are solved. her questions bring no additional insight - they could have taken anyone narrating this. I think she should have built on her own cases as a premise for this.

i'm asking myself, why the hell, as a former homicide prosecutor! is she doing this now? the only logical explanation for me would be: it's her hobby? & bc she is married to the channel-boss.... idk.... - i wouldn't recommend it...and i watch A LOT of crime-s***

I can't relate to all the personal, negative comments directed at the host. The narrator and/or host is important, but I don't care whether they are her cases or not or if she (allegedly) has a shady past. She doesn't bring that to the show & IMO is 1 of the most subtle hosts I've seen. Even her voice & makeup are subtle, unlike other hosts. I actually like her interview style & the way she personalizes some of the questions. It shows an empathy that is missing with many narrators & hosts & draws out strong, honest reactions from the interviewees. I do not lose sleep over whether she really means it deep down inside. I'm here for the cases & victims.

The cases on this show are very interesting & haven't been covered to death. More importantly, they talk to all the people involved in the crimes, down to witnesses, 911 operators, neighbors, etc & don't do all the dumb, long re-enactment scenes w/actors. Give me the real victims & heroes of each case every time please!

I actually really like this show! Not sure why the ratings are so low. I love this genre, and I think Anna-Sigga is a great host. Interesting stories, and she is a thorough and compassionate interviewer.

You claim to have been doing this for two decades yet have only amassed a quantity of 30 homicide convictions. What kind of track record is that? Why don't you try and aspire to that of someone like Lieutenant Joe Kenda? Just sayin'.

With any good documentary or even true crime show, the best are those in which you rarely see the person documenting. In this case, so much film is totally wasted as the viewer is forced to watch the host of the show. I watched a few episodes and was done. The stories aren't even that compelling. The host is featured prominently in at least 50% of the show. Film that really should be used to properly document the facts, is shamefully wasted filming the host. In Maryland we call this an "Over cooked Ham" YAWN It really has to be said this host, in her quest for fame, does the victims and the families of the victims NO justice.