The Cropsey Incident

Gonna keep it short and sweet. this movie was crap don't bother watching it. only good thing was the few gore scenes. definetly a 2/10

It's rare for me not to find anything worthy of interest in a movie, but here comes this film. The editing is nerve-wracking. The shots, video quality and colors might cause diarrhea with some viewers. The characters just won't die quickly enough to stop the bleeding of our ears and eyes, especially the lead woman, who's constantly yelling obscenities and who actually comes across, really, like a human piece of garbage. She's despicable in every possible ways, which in itself is a very, very nasty way of portraying women these days. She and her male companion are totally obnoxious. The whole thing is an ego trip, both from the standpoint of its characters, and from its producer/film director's. It's overbloated, distorted, insulting, incoherent, brainless and it doesn't even portray the youth in a very positive way. Worse, it takes its viewers for less than nothing. Ugh. What a waste...

Like a couple reviewers said just turned this off halfway thru lol. The description actually makes this sound like a possibly good movie. My boyfriend told me I was banned from choosing red box movies lol I said whatever I swear the description did not warn me of this total crap. It's one so bad u feel compelled to get on your imbd account and warn people to just not see it. It's one so bad u are pissed over spending $1.75 to rent it and pissed u coulda just spent your time sleeping instead. Annoying boring not entertaining in any way and definitely doesn't belong under "horror" cuz not scary.....at all lol other than scary how this piece of crap ends up being rentable

I was prepared to give this film a chance, however it is just bad. Awful acting, apart from Hannah Phelps who is on. The characters are pretty much vile people, who are seeking internet fame, I was just waiting for them to die. It is obviously zero budget, and found footage but it no excuse how cheap and amateur this is. I'd recommend you watch Gonjiam: Haunted Asylum to see how it's done.

THE CROPSEY INCIDENT is a found footage movie which follows four misguided do-gooders into the woods where they search for the eponymous child kidnapper and killer.

Cropsey is a real-life urban legend based in the New York and New Jersey area, and evidently his story has been used to scare the bejesus out of kids around bonfires in Summer camp. It is even the basis for the halfway decent 80s slasher flick THE BURNING (1981).

Anyway, this film is clearly meant as satire; it has characters which are way over the top and features many absurd moments to make a point. Unfortunately, it misses practically on every count.

Most importantly, what this satire criticizes does not ring true because it tries to eat its cake and have it, too.

Here is concrete example: the main character is the leader of the group of progressive zealots. She does not care one whit for truth, and goes even to the length of making the victim of an unrelated attack say things to the camera to further convince the audience of her cause. So far, so good: this is end-justifies-the means reasoning that characterizes many an ideological zealot.

But then, the movie turns around and shows her in later scenes dreaming of becoming an actress and having her own perfume line, the ultimate symbol of capitalist luxury. So the zealotry was all fake, and in reality she is just another vapid social media personality.

The problem is that in real life, there is no real overlap between these two groups, and that is actually for a good reason. If someone was as vapid as the protagonist turns out to be, then they would not have had the capacity to impersonate a convinced ideologue because being that takes hard work of the kind that vapid social media types generally avoid. However far off the truth, an ideological zealot makes a massive effort to be informed (or misinformed) about their pet issue, usually a societal ill that affects some disadvantaged segment. A vapid influencer type would be too self-centered to bother finding out about those things beyond the most superficial layer

So, in the end, this is just dumb, lazy critique of progressive zealots. Satire that makes fun of them has been around for a long time, for example BANANAS (1971) by Woody Allen, which I consider one of his lesser works but still immeasurably better than this hodgepodge. One movie about murderous progressive liberal do-gooders which is not only well-made and funny but actually succeeds as satire is THE LAST SUPPER (1995), which does basically everything right that this film fails at. Also, a thematically similar found footage movie about film-makers trying to expose a legend related to child abuse which actually shows how to break new ground in the genre is WEKUFE (2016).

The general laziness or perhaps incompetence extends to other aspects of this movie: the story is half-baked; the pace is off; the acting is bad, the dialogue amateurish and many gags miss.

Also, even though this is supposed to be found footage, the director apparently abandons it later in the movie in favor of many shots that could not have been shot by any in-movie camera.

About halfway through, I predicted how this movie was going to end, and only hung in there to check. Turns out, I was right. The idea for the ironic ending, that if we go to sufficient extreme, we become what we hate, was actually not bad but was severely undermined by the failure to make a proper satire. In particular, if the leader of the group was really just a vapid influencer, her hate for cropsey-even as an idea- would not have been genuine, so the irony falls flat.