IMDb-BEWERTUNG
6,5/10
2313
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Célines Sohn, bei einem tragischen Sturz aus dem Fenster ums Leben kommt. Der Unfall trägt sich so schnell zu, dass Augenzeugin Alice nicht einschreiten kann. Blind vor Schmerz beschuldigt C... Alles lesenCélines Sohn, bei einem tragischen Sturz aus dem Fenster ums Leben kommt. Der Unfall trägt sich so schnell zu, dass Augenzeugin Alice nicht einschreiten kann. Blind vor Schmerz beschuldigt Céline Alice, ihren Sohn nicht gerettet zu haben.Célines Sohn, bei einem tragischen Sturz aus dem Fenster ums Leben kommt. Der Unfall trägt sich so schnell zu, dass Augenzeugin Alice nicht einschreiten kann. Blind vor Schmerz beschuldigt Céline Alice, ihren Sohn nicht gerettet zu haben.
- Regie
- Drehbuch
- Hauptbesetzung
- Auszeichnungen
- 10 Gewinne & 2 Nominierungen insgesamt
Jules Lefebvre
- Theo
- (as Jules Lefebvres)
André Pasquasy
- Doctor
- (Nicht genannt)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
After a tragic accident shatters the friendly alliance between two neighbours, they start harassing each other to find out who really was responsible for what happened. While the audience at first thinks it was a perfectly banal accident, their doubt is being fuelled scene after scene...
Veerle Baetens' en Anne Coessens' performances are filled with subtle mistrust and held-back anger. These two characters playing off each other are a true feast for the spectators. Also the young Jules Lefebre acts with a maturity beyond his years. The cinematography by Hichame Alaouie is effective and - even though the pace at times threatens to slow down a bit too much - keeps every scene interesting and fresh: playing with angles, lighting and other effects to signify the slow descent into madness. Olivier Masset-Depasses' direction is clean, whilst never sinking into blandness.
However, the omnipresent score is overblown and lacks subtlety, but regularly does capture the right atmosphere for the scene. The story after a while threatens to loose its own point, but regains its footing again in the finale. And what a chilling finale that was! One last nit-picking comment can be that the film could have raised uncertainty and suspicion even more than it in fact did.
Finally, one cannot ignore the not-so-subtle hints to Hitchcock's work in the production design, costumes and building of tension. It's expertly done and - in my humble opinion - this movie is perfectly capable of standing between great names such as 'Rear Window' and 'The Man Who Knew Too Much'. A shame it only came out in 2018, because back in the 60's, it would have perplexed it's audiences. It's not without drawbacks, but then again... which one of Hitchcock wasn't?
Veerle Baetens' en Anne Coessens' performances are filled with subtle mistrust and held-back anger. These two characters playing off each other are a true feast for the spectators. Also the young Jules Lefebre acts with a maturity beyond his years. The cinematography by Hichame Alaouie is effective and - even though the pace at times threatens to slow down a bit too much - keeps every scene interesting and fresh: playing with angles, lighting and other effects to signify the slow descent into madness. Olivier Masset-Depasses' direction is clean, whilst never sinking into blandness.
However, the omnipresent score is overblown and lacks subtlety, but regularly does capture the right atmosphere for the scene. The story after a while threatens to loose its own point, but regains its footing again in the finale. And what a chilling finale that was! One last nit-picking comment can be that the film could have raised uncertainty and suspicion even more than it in fact did.
Finally, one cannot ignore the not-so-subtle hints to Hitchcock's work in the production design, costumes and building of tension. It's expertly done and - in my humble opinion - this movie is perfectly capable of standing between great names such as 'Rear Window' and 'The Man Who Knew Too Much'. A shame it only came out in 2018, because back in the 60's, it would have perplexed it's audiences. It's not without drawbacks, but then again... which one of Hitchcock wasn't?
If Alfred Hitchcock was alive and well and making movies in France, this would be the sort of thing he'd be doing. And my hat is off to Olivier Masset-Depasse for adding his own sinister touch to it. Under his direction, all of the actors are outstanding--which is important because in the wrong hands the story could have turned out like a Lifetime movie. But I was truly on the edge of my seat for much of this.
Alice (Veerle Baetens) and Céline (Anne Coesens) are neighbors, best friends and their families spend all their time together. However, when a terrible tragedy hits their lives, their relationship changes significantly and they both start to question everything that kept them together.
Watching alternately the American version of 2024 and the Franco-Belgian version of 2018, a very similar remake, with some small changes, but a powerful and controversial drama, which tries to confuse us until its final act of destruction... I notice a slight preference for the original in its poetic and tearful final scene, and in small contexts that seem more plausible, while the second one tries to justify the facts (unnecessarily)... Excellent adapted production...
Watching alternately the American version of 2024 and the Franco-Belgian version of 2018, a very similar remake, with some small changes, but a powerful and controversial drama, which tries to confuse us until its final act of destruction... I notice a slight preference for the original in its poetic and tearful final scene, and in small contexts that seem more plausible, while the second one tries to justify the facts (unnecessarily)... Excellent adapted production...
He could/would be proud of this one.
Ticks so many boxes: Production design 9 Acting performances 9 Plot twist 9 Pace 7 Score 7 Casting 10 What's not to like. Now I've got to get to the required characters of 600 for this review to be valid, but that's an easy peasy lemon squeezy job. This movie sucked me in from minute one and never let go. Sometimes you would think: is the protagonist going nad, or is she the only one thinking straight? All this in a time period where men could still decide about theit wives' wellbeing by just stating they're crazy. This is a director I will follow and hope stands up to (t)his very promising standard.
Ticks so many boxes: Production design 9 Acting performances 9 Plot twist 9 Pace 7 Score 7 Casting 10 What's not to like. Now I've got to get to the required characters of 600 for this review to be valid, but that's an easy peasy lemon squeezy job. This movie sucked me in from minute one and never let go. Sometimes you would think: is the protagonist going nad, or is she the only one thinking straight? All this in a time period where men could still decide about theit wives' wellbeing by just stating they're crazy. This is a director I will follow and hope stands up to (t)his very promising standard.
Good movie and the final really I was not expecting. Enjoyed it.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesWhile the film is set in the 1960s, the original novel is set in the 2010s.
- VerbindungenRemade as Mothers' Instinct (2024)
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is Mothers' Instinct?Powered by Alexa
Details
Box Office
- Budget
- 3.900.000 € (geschätzt)
- Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
- 135.950 $
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 37 Minuten
- Farbe
- Seitenverhältnis
- 2.39 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen