All of My Heart: Inn Love

I LOVE the first movie, "All of my Heart". It is excellent. And as actors, I LOVE both leads. Imagine my dismay when KEY aspects of the first movie are altered for "...Inn Love". No offense to Terry Ingram, idk you; but you blew it! You had the same writer, cast and a built-in audience! I'm shocked that there is a third movie frankly because the second one was so flat. And, for #3 I'm just learning, they lose the house??!? Then what the heck is the point?!?!! Whose brilliant idea was that?!?! I hope not KB.

I have again been reminded of the importance of good Direction. And hello? Continuity??!?!!! I am rewatching #1 AGAIN because it's SO good. I erased #2. Not worth seeing again. The loss of continuity is TOO distracting. And VERY irritating!!! And I WILL NOT even bother with #3. Why bother? It's Terry Ingram again, so I imagine I would be PAINFULLY disappointed. Great way to ruin a great thing fella! 😫😤 Lacey and Brennan, I really enjoy you both. Your work Individually and together. Best wishes to you both. And thank you Karen Berger for creating the characters and original story. Sincerely, Trish Norman

Chabert and Elliott together again.

Plot Couple renovate a house together (and yes Hallmark, we did notice that it is a different house) they almost loose the house Brian returns to Wall Street to keep them financially afloat until they can get the Inn up and running successfully. Jenny worries that Brian may be falling for the lure of Wall Street again and may be tiring of their small town/country life.

Different house, different goats, we can deal with that.

Seriously, it is a very good movie and well worth watching Chabert and Elliott always shine together, the perfect movie couple.

My advice: Good family film, watch it together.

If you're going to make a trilogy you should make sure that there is continuity. The first movie was charming and I was looking forward to the next in the series. I just had trouble getting past the house and the goats! The first house was very pretty and they painted it green. It looked like a perfect B & B. The one in the second movie is an ordinary house and it's white and blue. Enter the goats. They're a significant part of the story and they look completely different from the ones in the first movie and yet they're supposed to be the same goats. The mama goat was white and cream and the kids were pure white. In the second they're all black and white. It's very annoying. The kitchen that they worked on so much in the first one is totally different. If they couldn't get the same place they should've at least tried to make it look the same. I wonder what we will get in the third movie. I'll find out today because I still love the stories and cast, just wish they'd pay more attention to the details.

Like both of these actors very much. First better than sequel. However, wondering what happened to the original house they inherited and just newly painted green? It appears to be a totally different house beyond a remodel...ha! Oh well, guess were not supposed to notice. I enjoy these two whatever they are starring in.

In high measure, the film is saved by the admirable performance of Lacey Chabert and Brennan Elliot. The story seems improvised and The Emily în sounds less credible. And the mix of Wall Street, goats, patisery and hospotality works hard and, in some measure, wrong. But, sure good intentions and supporting actors. Some nice humor is a reasonable support, to. But three romances and a critic seduced by electrician seems too much.

The result is just nice - with some indulgence - and the status of Hallmark movie is OK for decent expectations and a fist of excuses.

Good point - the taste of sweets. Easy to imagine good consolation.