Starfish
- 2023
- 2 Std. 1 Min.
IMDb-BEWERTUNG
4,4/10
19.741
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Eine wunderschöne Reise durch die Tiefen der Unterwasserwelt, während sich vor unseren Augen eine ergreifende Geschichte über Trauer und Heilung entfaltet.Eine wunderschöne Reise durch die Tiefen der Unterwasserwelt, während sich vor unseren Augen eine ergreifende Geschichte über Trauer und Heilung entfaltet.Eine wunderschöne Reise durch die Tiefen der Unterwasserwelt, während sich vor unseren Augen eine ergreifende Geschichte über Trauer und Heilung entfaltet.
- Regie
- Drehbuch
- Hauptbesetzung
Matteo Caruana Bond
- Valletta Resident
- (Nicht genannt)
Paul Doolan
- Memorial attendee
- (Nicht genannt)
Maxime Durand
- Maltese Policeman
- (Nicht genannt)
Tiziana Tedesco Triccas
- Bridesmaid
- (Nicht genannt)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
Waste of resources and waste of time. If you have so much money, kindly give it to me. I'll make a better film than this. It's a migraine. No story, no talent with 10% potential. The director has made a mess. It looks like they've gone on a holiday and made this film. Watch if you want to waste your time. T-Series has produced this film, and there's not even one good song in the entire movie. At least for your family members (Khushhali Kumar), kindly make a good film and get a good composer next time. Khushhali Kumar's acting is very bad. Limited star cast, and they all are bad. It looks like black money; they wanted to turn it white, so they made this garbage called "Starfish."
I had to leave the movie in interval, I couldn't tolerate such a mess.
The Starfish movie, despite its ambitious premise, ultimately falls short of expectations on multiple fronts, leaving the viewer with a sense of dissatisfaction and missed potential.
One of the major drawbacks of the film lies in its narrative execution. The plot, which initially promised a unique and intriguing storyline, quickly devolves into a convoluted mess. The filmmakers seemed to prioritize style over substance, resulting in a confusing narrative that leaves the audience struggling to piece together the disjointed events. The lack of a cohesive and well-developed storyline undermines the entire viewing experience, leaving viewers disoriented and detached from the characters' journeys.
Character development is another notable weak point in Starfish. The film introduces a cast of characters with the potential for depth and complexity, yet their arcs remain underexplored and unconvincing. Viewers are left with one-dimensional characters who fail to evoke empathy or investment. The protagonist's motivations and internal struggles are particularly poorly conveyed, making it challenging for the audience to connect with or care about the central figure's fate. The film misses an opportunity to create a meaningful emotional impact, as the characters lack the depth needed to resonate with the audience on a personal level.
Pacing issues further exacerbate the film's problems. Starfish suffers from inconsistent pacing that oscillates between sluggish and frenetic, making it difficult for viewers to fully immerse themselves in the unfolding events. The abrupt shifts in tempo disrupt the narrative flow, hindering the establishment of a cohesive and engaging viewing experience. This lack of pacing cohesion results in a film that feels disjointed and haphazardly put together, preventing any sustained tension or emotional resonance.
Special effects, a crucial aspect of any modern sci-fi film, fail to impress in Starfish. The visual elements intended to bring the fantastical elements of the story to life appear lackluster and dated. In an era where audiences have come to expect cutting-edge CGI and immersive visual experiences, Starfish falls behind, relying on subpar effects that diminish the overall quality of the film. The lack of attention to detail in the visual presentation serves as a constant reminder of the film's budgetary constraints, detracting from the audience's ability to fully immerse themselves in the fictional world.
The film's soundtrack, rather than enhancing the viewing experience, proves to be a distraction. The music, seemingly discordant with the film's tone, fails to complement the on-screen action or evoke the desired emotional responses. Instead of contributing to a cohesive atmosphere, the soundtrack often feels like an afterthought, further highlighting the film's lack of attention to detail in crucial areas.
One of the film's most significant failings is its inability to deliver a satisfying resolution. The climax feels rushed and unsatisfying, leaving numerous unanswered questions and loose ends. Viewers are left feeling unfulfilled and wondering if there were aspects of the story that were overlooked or simply left unexplained. A well-executed resolution is essential for providing closure and leaving a lasting impression, and in this regard, Starfish falls disappointingly short.
In conclusion, Starfish, despite its initial promise, ultimately disappoints on multiple fronts. From a convoluted and poorly executed narrative to underdeveloped characters, inconsistent pacing, lackluster special effects, and an unsatisfying resolution, the film fails to deliver a compelling and engaging sci-fi experience. While ambitious in its concept, the execution leaves much to be desired, resulting in a cinematic endeavor that struggles to leave a lasting impact on its audience.
The Starfish movie, despite its ambitious premise, ultimately falls short of expectations on multiple fronts, leaving the viewer with a sense of dissatisfaction and missed potential.
One of the major drawbacks of the film lies in its narrative execution. The plot, which initially promised a unique and intriguing storyline, quickly devolves into a convoluted mess. The filmmakers seemed to prioritize style over substance, resulting in a confusing narrative that leaves the audience struggling to piece together the disjointed events. The lack of a cohesive and well-developed storyline undermines the entire viewing experience, leaving viewers disoriented and detached from the characters' journeys.
Character development is another notable weak point in Starfish. The film introduces a cast of characters with the potential for depth and complexity, yet their arcs remain underexplored and unconvincing. Viewers are left with one-dimensional characters who fail to evoke empathy or investment. The protagonist's motivations and internal struggles are particularly poorly conveyed, making it challenging for the audience to connect with or care about the central figure's fate. The film misses an opportunity to create a meaningful emotional impact, as the characters lack the depth needed to resonate with the audience on a personal level.
Pacing issues further exacerbate the film's problems. Starfish suffers from inconsistent pacing that oscillates between sluggish and frenetic, making it difficult for viewers to fully immerse themselves in the unfolding events. The abrupt shifts in tempo disrupt the narrative flow, hindering the establishment of a cohesive and engaging viewing experience. This lack of pacing cohesion results in a film that feels disjointed and haphazardly put together, preventing any sustained tension or emotional resonance.
Special effects, a crucial aspect of any modern sci-fi film, fail to impress in Starfish. The visual elements intended to bring the fantastical elements of the story to life appear lackluster and dated. In an era where audiences have come to expect cutting-edge CGI and immersive visual experiences, Starfish falls behind, relying on subpar effects that diminish the overall quality of the film. The lack of attention to detail in the visual presentation serves as a constant reminder of the film's budgetary constraints, detracting from the audience's ability to fully immerse themselves in the fictional world.
The film's soundtrack, rather than enhancing the viewing experience, proves to be a distraction. The music, seemingly discordant with the film's tone, fails to complement the on-screen action or evoke the desired emotional responses. Instead of contributing to a cohesive atmosphere, the soundtrack often feels like an afterthought, further highlighting the film's lack of attention to detail in crucial areas.
One of the film's most significant failings is its inability to deliver a satisfying resolution. The climax feels rushed and unsatisfying, leaving numerous unanswered questions and loose ends. Viewers are left feeling unfulfilled and wondering if there were aspects of the story that were overlooked or simply left unexplained. A well-executed resolution is essential for providing closure and leaving a lasting impression, and in this regard, Starfish falls disappointingly short.
In conclusion, Starfish, despite its initial promise, ultimately disappoints on multiple fronts. From a convoluted and poorly executed narrative to underdeveloped characters, inconsistent pacing, lackluster special effects, and an unsatisfying resolution, the film fails to deliver a compelling and engaging sci-fi experience. While ambitious in its concept, the execution leaves much to be desired, resulting in a cinematic endeavor that struggles to leave a lasting impact on its audience.
Starfish is an absolute cinematic gem that deserves every bit of praise it receives. This visually stunning masterpiece takes storytelling to new heights, blending breathtaking visuals with a gripping narrative that keeps you on the edge of your seat from start to finish. The film's special effects are nothing short of mesmerizing, transporting the audience to otherworldly realms with seamless precision. The attention to detail in the CGI work is unparalleled, creating a vivid and immersive experience that stays with you long after the credits roll. What truly sets "Starfish" apart, however, is its brilliant cast. The performances are nothing short of stellar, with each actor bringing depth and authenticity to their characters. The chemistry on screen is palpable, enhancing the emotional resonance of the story. The character development is expertly crafted, allowing the audience to connect on a profound level.
Starfish," directed by Akhilesh Jaiswal and adapted from Bina Nayak's novel "Starfish Pickle," embarks on a narrative journey that, unfortunately, encounters turbulent waters. The film introduces us to Tara, portrayed by Khushalii Kumar, a diver entangled in the undertow of her past. Despite a promising start, the cinematic voyage is hindered by a choppy narrative, impulsive editing, and a screenplay that lacks finesse.
The initial chapters offer a glimpse into Tara's world, but impulsive edits disrupt the flow, hindering the audience's immersion. The film grapples with a momentary dip in engagement, struggling against a cinematic tide that refuses to be tamed. While Jim Edgar's cinematography captures stunning underwater scenes, it becomes a victim of the film's impulsive editing, overshadowing its potential impact.
Set against the enchanting backdrop of Malta, Tara's life as a diver and her struggle with PTSD are hindered by a screenplay that meanders lazily through thematic depths. Conflicts between moving on and confronting past wounds feel diluted, failing to leave a lasting impact. Relationships with Aman (Tushar Khanna) and Neel (Ehan Bhat) suffer from predictability, lacking the emotional depth intended.
Despite Khushalii Kumar's commendable performance, the film struggles to rise above its challenges. The attempt to deliver a compelling exploration of human emotions is marred by a choppy narrative and a screenplay that misses opportunities. While Jim Edgar's cinematography shines, it becomes a victim of the film's lack of cohesion.
In conclusion, "Starfish" falters in its attempt to provide a seamless and immersive cinematic experience. The film's untamed currents, represented by its choppy narrative and impulsive editing, may leave audiences grappling with cinematic confusion. Unfortunately, the lack of interest-inducing elements categorizes "Starfish" as a waste of time, failing to make the overall viewing experience compelling or worthwhile.
The initial chapters offer a glimpse into Tara's world, but impulsive edits disrupt the flow, hindering the audience's immersion. The film grapples with a momentary dip in engagement, struggling against a cinematic tide that refuses to be tamed. While Jim Edgar's cinematography captures stunning underwater scenes, it becomes a victim of the film's impulsive editing, overshadowing its potential impact.
Set against the enchanting backdrop of Malta, Tara's life as a diver and her struggle with PTSD are hindered by a screenplay that meanders lazily through thematic depths. Conflicts between moving on and confronting past wounds feel diluted, failing to leave a lasting impact. Relationships with Aman (Tushar Khanna) and Neel (Ehan Bhat) suffer from predictability, lacking the emotional depth intended.
Despite Khushalii Kumar's commendable performance, the film struggles to rise above its challenges. The attempt to deliver a compelling exploration of human emotions is marred by a choppy narrative and a screenplay that misses opportunities. While Jim Edgar's cinematography shines, it becomes a victim of the film's lack of cohesion.
In conclusion, "Starfish" falters in its attempt to provide a seamless and immersive cinematic experience. The film's untamed currents, represented by its choppy narrative and impulsive editing, may leave audiences grappling with cinematic confusion. Unfortunately, the lack of interest-inducing elements categorizes "Starfish" as a waste of time, failing to make the overall viewing experience compelling or worthwhile.
A parfum advertisement has more coherence that this film. It is like "mexican soap opera meets Bollywood". Countless continuity errors, stereotypical music, poor performances, in a display of exuberance and lavish locations. On the bright side, it can serve very well as a travel advertisement of Malta and southern Italy. If you are the type of person that can't sleep without some white noise or something in the background, this movie is perfect for you. Otherwise, don't bother.
As I have nothing else to say about this movie, I will write this final sentence to fill the gap in this review. Bye.
As I have nothing else to say about this movie, I will write this final sentence to fill the gap in this review. Bye.
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
Details
- Laufzeit2 Stunden 1 Minute
- Farbe
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen