2038: George Almore arbeitet an einer echten menschenähnlichen KI. Sein neuester Prototyp ist fast fertig. Diese sensible Phase ist auch die riskanteste.2038: George Almore arbeitet an einer echten menschenähnlichen KI. Sein neuester Prototyp ist fast fertig. Diese sensible Phase ist auch die riskanteste.2038: George Almore arbeitet an einer echten menschenähnlichen KI. Sein neuester Prototyp ist fast fertig. Diese sensible Phase ist auch die riskanteste.
- Auszeichnungen
- 1 Gewinn & 1 Nominierung insgesamt
Stacy Martin
- Jules Almore
- (Synchronisation)
- …
Lia Williams
- House
- (Synchronisation)
Ami Masamitsu
- Japanese Voices Performer
- (Synchronisation)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
As a sci-fi fan, I found this admittedly derivative film extremely enjoyable. It is stylishly shot, directed and acted with aplomb by the attractive and enigmatic leads of Theo James and Stacy Martin. Indeed, the latter is well cast in her role who is both ambiguous, childlike and yet empathetic all at the same time. The wonderful Toby Jones also turns up in an extended cameo just to give it that bit extra. If you want wham, bang, action this is definitely not for you. However, if you enjoy psychological, moody sci-fi with stunning visuals then there is much you will enjoy. It is very 'Twilight Zone' with an ending I didn't anticipate.
I didn't think a story about artificial intelligence could be so heartbreaking. If you aren't willing to be emotionally invested in this film then don't bother to start it. It has a good premise and some interesting themes. The acting is solid. I give this film a 7 (good) out of 10. {SciFi, Thriller, Drama}
I caught this at a Drive-In double feature with "Palm Springs." I think that pairing made this pale in comparison.
I will say that I was VERY impressed with the production design and the special effects; nothing looked cheesy or unrealistic (I haven't found any budget information anywhere yet). And that's about it. Theo James has the looks of a young De Niro or James Franco from time to time, but he (or his character) is quite charmless.
It's strange that this reminded me of "Moon" so much, when you consider that the director of this film worked on "Moon" back in 2009. But that film is buoyed by an engrossing Sam Rockwell performance. And "Ex Machina" has the balance of Domnhall Gleeson and Oscar Issac's performances. Theo James can't really anchor this whole movie. The other actors are fine, but seem ornamental.
This is above-average for its design, but middle-of-the-road for just about everything else.
I will say that I was VERY impressed with the production design and the special effects; nothing looked cheesy or unrealistic (I haven't found any budget information anywhere yet). And that's about it. Theo James has the looks of a young De Niro or James Franco from time to time, but he (or his character) is quite charmless.
It's strange that this reminded me of "Moon" so much, when you consider that the director of this film worked on "Moon" back in 2009. But that film is buoyed by an engrossing Sam Rockwell performance. And "Ex Machina" has the balance of Domnhall Gleeson and Oscar Issac's performances. Theo James can't really anchor this whole movie. The other actors are fine, but seem ornamental.
This is above-average for its design, but middle-of-the-road for just about everything else.
If I would compare it to an other movie, it would be a spoiler. Then again, once you've seen it, maybe I gave you a hint with what I just wrote. Or maybe I didn't (but I probably did, didn't I?). That aside, because I don't want to spoil anything, if you are into Science Fiction movies, you may like this. It has very good visuals and while I wouldn't call myself a Theo James fan (more a Stacy Martin fan), he does a really good job.
There is tension there are questions ... and there are themes that some might have resolved otherwise. But it does make sense overall. And while you could question everything in the end, you could also just take it with a grain of salt. And just accept that some things, possible in reality or not, just make sense in the overall world of the movie. So it is coherent and well thought of, but even that does not mean you will like it
There is tension there are questions ... and there are themes that some might have resolved otherwise. But it does make sense overall. And while you could question everything in the end, you could also just take it with a grain of salt. And just accept that some things, possible in reality or not, just make sense in the overall world of the movie. So it is coherent and well thought of, but even that does not mean you will like it
I was just going to let this pass by, untill reading an interview with the director. Which drove me to this.
First the good. Slow burning but not too slow, good cinematography, decent acting. The robots J1 and J2 are excellent. Character development in the first 2/3rd's is good. The last 3rd let's it down, the shock ending is anything but a shock and simply burns the first parts down. I think the Toby Jones scene finished it for me in retrospect. Nothing to do with his performance which is great work as always, but it demonstrates the lack of closure the film winds up at by pulling the same tired twist as other, better works.
Hint. When being interviewed about your tripe filled film that ends with a tried and tested one, don't tell us you burned all the usual tropes in your search for originality.
A pity, as the emotional nuances provided by the bots ARE really good, it deserved a more eloquent ending to match the set up, which is done well. A solid 7.5.
First the good. Slow burning but not too slow, good cinematography, decent acting. The robots J1 and J2 are excellent. Character development in the first 2/3rd's is good. The last 3rd let's it down, the shock ending is anything but a shock and simply burns the first parts down. I think the Toby Jones scene finished it for me in retrospect. Nothing to do with his performance which is great work as always, but it demonstrates the lack of closure the film winds up at by pulling the same tired twist as other, better works.
Hint. When being interviewed about your tripe filled film that ends with a tried and tested one, don't tell us you burned all the usual tropes in your search for originality.
A pity, as the emotional nuances provided by the bots ARE really good, it deserved a more eloquent ending to match the set up, which is done well. A solid 7.5.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesA few times during the movie reference is made to a Black Mesa research facility. Black Mesa is the name of the facility at which Gordon Freeman works in the Half-Life series of video games.
- PatzerThe risk assessor who meets with and is seated with Almore, chugs the remainder of his cocktail and sets it down. He gets up to leave in a separate shot, and about 3/4 of an inch of his cocktail is back in the glass. The two gentlemen speak a while, and in a separate edited take, the glass is then again empty.
- Zitate
George Almore: You sleep last night?
J3: Yes. I've been dreaming a lot. Last night I... Well I don't know if I'm dreaming or remembering. Dreams do that, don't they?
- VerbindungenFeatures Snow-White (1933)
- SoundtracksFunny How Time Slips Away
(1961)
Words and music by Willie Nelson
Performed by Willie Nelson
Courtesy of Liberty Records (Universal Music)
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsländer
- Sprachen
- Auch bekannt als
- Творець
- Drehorte
- Produktionsfirmen
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
Box Office
- Bruttoertrag in den USA und Kanada
- 139.593 $
- Eröffnungswochenende in den USA und in Kanada
- 52.642 $
- 12. Juli 2020
- Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
- 243.279 $
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 49 Minuten
- Farbe
- Seitenverhältnis
- 2.39:1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen