IMDb-BEWERTUNG
8,2/10
5156
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Joe Rogan moderiert Langformgespräche mit Freunden und Gästen, darunter Komödianten, Schauspieler, Musiker, MMA-Ausbilder und Kommentatoren, Autoren und Künstler.Joe Rogan moderiert Langformgespräche mit Freunden und Gästen, darunter Komödianten, Schauspieler, Musiker, MMA-Ausbilder und Kommentatoren, Autoren und Künstler.Joe Rogan moderiert Langformgespräche mit Freunden und Gästen, darunter Komödianten, Schauspieler, Musiker, MMA-Ausbilder und Kommentatoren, Autoren und Künstler.
- Auszeichnungen
- 1 Gewinn & 6 Nominierungen insgesamt
Folgen durchsuchen
Empfohlene Bewertungen
Great episodes that show how a podcast can outdo TV presented information in every way shape or form great content and great guest and topics ranging from poop jokes to top scientist with new information. Pretty much something for everyone!
Joe has many amazing & engrossing episodes that make you think 3 hours is nothing. Jordan Peterson's appearances are at the very top. However Joe puts out a lot of boring stuff, and has his buddies on way too much for it to get more then a 7.
Sure Joe is a comic and sure he can state at times incorrect information, while stating that he is a moron and isn't qualified to give information, this is why he has qualified professionals on and has Jamie google A LOT of what he states to be true. He is BY FAR the GOAT interviewer, he plays dumb at times so that the audience can get the information from that perspective, when it is clear that he is intelligent and does know A LOT because he is insightful and questions things that should be, as we all should do. You don't need to be a genius to watch listen to this podcast thanks to Joe asking questions in a way that allows the audience from all walks of life to enjoy.
10philnyc
I've been listening to the JRE since the very first episodes with the snowflakes.
The reason for listening to podcasts (instead of, say, your whenever o'clock news, or mockumentaries, or ad-riddled TV content, or sound-byte yelling matches that last less than 5 minutes by design) for me is threefold (and here I'm using JRE as an excellent example, but there are other podcasts I can recommend for the same reasons)
1) Variety of content. For the stated goal of personal interest, the host has had an incredible range of guests, from mountain climbers to rocket scientists to hulking mma beasts to brainiacs, all with multiply contradicting points of view from which the listener learns a great deal as they get untangled during the podcast, from a variety of angles
2) Clear intellect. Jordan Peterson crystallized this for me in a recent JRE podcast of his, but essentially clear intellect can be described as truthful intent, transparency in communicated thought, or just a certain "vibe" that you get from someone. Clear intellect from the host allows for the guests to open up and talk freely, rather than clam up and try to defend something, and it allows for limitlessly deeper discussion
3) Uncensored for content and unedited for time. Pretty self explanatory. The lack of censorship should go without saying, but in today's world its kinda crazy that there's still rampant censorship "out there". But even more important for me is the lack of editing for time. Some podcasts have gone on for 3+ hours, and 2 hours seems the sweet spot. If you can enjoy a feature length film, why not a discussion between a professional conversationalist and a professional something-else about a variety of topics no less interesting than a film plot?
Bonus: portability. The audio-only nature (although many podcasts including JRE have a video portion that is sometimes useful) allows you to listen at ease during your commute, heads down coding sessions, whatever.
The reason for listening to podcasts (instead of, say, your whenever o'clock news, or mockumentaries, or ad-riddled TV content, or sound-byte yelling matches that last less than 5 minutes by design) for me is threefold (and here I'm using JRE as an excellent example, but there are other podcasts I can recommend for the same reasons)
1) Variety of content. For the stated goal of personal interest, the host has had an incredible range of guests, from mountain climbers to rocket scientists to hulking mma beasts to brainiacs, all with multiply contradicting points of view from which the listener learns a great deal as they get untangled during the podcast, from a variety of angles
2) Clear intellect. Jordan Peterson crystallized this for me in a recent JRE podcast of his, but essentially clear intellect can be described as truthful intent, transparency in communicated thought, or just a certain "vibe" that you get from someone. Clear intellect from the host allows for the guests to open up and talk freely, rather than clam up and try to defend something, and it allows for limitlessly deeper discussion
3) Uncensored for content and unedited for time. Pretty self explanatory. The lack of censorship should go without saying, but in today's world its kinda crazy that there's still rampant censorship "out there". But even more important for me is the lack of editing for time. Some podcasts have gone on for 3+ hours, and 2 hours seems the sweet spot. If you can enjoy a feature length film, why not a discussion between a professional conversationalist and a professional something-else about a variety of topics no less interesting than a film plot?
Bonus: portability. The audio-only nature (although many podcasts including JRE have a video portion that is sometimes useful) allows you to listen at ease during your commute, heads down coding sessions, whatever.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesEach episode includes sound bites of MMA fighters Rory MacDonald and Nick Diaz talking about the podcast. "Joe Rogan Podcast, check it out!" is said by Rory after his win over Che Mills in the UFC. "Train by day, Joe Rogan Podcast by night, all day!" is said by Nick after his win over B.J. Penn in the UFC.
- VerbindungenFeatured in CTV National News: Folge vom 7. September 2018 (2018)
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
Details
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen