IMDb-BEWERTUNG
4,3/10
18.077
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Als der russische Partner eines amerikanischen Diamantenhändlers verschwindet, reist er auf der Suche nach ihm nach Sibirien, fängt aber statt dessen eine Liebesbeziehung an.Als der russische Partner eines amerikanischen Diamantenhändlers verschwindet, reist er auf der Suche nach ihm nach Sibirien, fängt aber statt dessen eine Liebesbeziehung an.Als der russische Partner eines amerikanischen Diamantenhändlers verschwindet, reist er auf der Suche nach ihm nach Sibirien, fängt aber statt dessen eine Liebesbeziehung an.
- Auszeichnungen
- 3 Nominierungen insgesamt
Empfohlene Bewertungen
This film can only be described as a badly executed porn film. The acting is awful. The plot has more holes in it than a strippers fishnet tights and for the first time ever I was rooting for Keanu to get his ass kicked. Please, for the love of god, do not waste your time watching this film.
How a film this poor gets made is beyond me.
Dreadful attempt at a plot. Absent character development.
Canada as Siberia? Almost funny.
The two stars are for beautiful St Petersburg - about the only thing worth noting in this sorry excuse for a film.
Dreadful attempt at a plot. Absent character development.
Canada as Siberia? Almost funny.
The two stars are for beautiful St Petersburg - about the only thing worth noting in this sorry excuse for a film.
The screenplay destroyed any potential this film may have had.
The story is absolutely useless and unnecessary from start to midpoint. The remainder of the scenes where convoluted (especially the ending) and so dragged out - especially the lame sex scenes.
I had to fast forward most of the long scenes as I was losing my interest and patience. What were the writers thinking? A 5th grader could have written this better.
This film suffered an identity crisis; what is soft porn? what is a romance? was it a thriller? was it spy film? There was certainly no action or suspense. There where so many plot issues and more holes than in Swiss cheese.
The cinematography was the main highlight, then the acting, and finally the directing was fairly decent, although the director should have demanded this film be edited down - especially the dragged out useless scenes to perhaps a short film. 104 mins was waaay too long for the pacing that was so ridiculously slow. The score was also annoying.
As a huge fan of KR, this was a big disappointment and he should have passed on this one. A 3/10 from me only for the very few positive traits.
The story is absolutely useless and unnecessary from start to midpoint. The remainder of the scenes where convoluted (especially the ending) and so dragged out - especially the lame sex scenes.
I had to fast forward most of the long scenes as I was losing my interest and patience. What were the writers thinking? A 5th grader could have written this better.
This film suffered an identity crisis; what is soft porn? what is a romance? was it a thriller? was it spy film? There was certainly no action or suspense. There where so many plot issues and more holes than in Swiss cheese.
The cinematography was the main highlight, then the acting, and finally the directing was fairly decent, although the director should have demanded this film be edited down - especially the dragged out useless scenes to perhaps a short film. 104 mins was waaay too long for the pacing that was so ridiculously slow. The score was also annoying.
As a huge fan of KR, this was a big disappointment and he should have passed on this one. A 3/10 from me only for the very few positive traits.
This film tells the story of an American man who goes to Russia for a deal of blue diamonds.
The film starts off moderately good, but five minutes later it becomes horrendous. It becomes a romantic film, but there is no chemistry at all. They two characters do not seem attracted to each other, and their romance is contrived and unconvincing. After fifty minutes of romance, finally we get to see diamond related scenes again. Yet, these diamond scenes are just more excuses to have sex scenes. It just becomes quite ridiculous. The pace is slow, the story is implausible and the film just has no thrill or engagement. It is a plain bore, and does not captivate me at all. Frankly, it is quite a disappointing film.
The film starts off moderately good, but five minutes later it becomes horrendous. It becomes a romantic film, but there is no chemistry at all. They two characters do not seem attracted to each other, and their romance is contrived and unconvincing. After fifty minutes of romance, finally we get to see diamond related scenes again. Yet, these diamond scenes are just more excuses to have sex scenes. It just becomes quite ridiculous. The pace is slow, the story is implausible and the film just has no thrill or engagement. It is a plain bore, and does not captivate me at all. Frankly, it is quite a disappointing film.
This film was agonisingly painful to watch. Even the sex scenes were non eventful.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesNicolas Cage turned it down before it went to Keanu Reeves
- PatzerThe town in "Siberia" (actually shot in Marquette, Manitoba Canada) has green street signs that are obviously of North American design and would not be present in the real Siberia.
- Zitate
Boris Volkov: [speaking Russian] Who are you, huh? Who are you
Pavel: I think he speaks Russian.
Boris Volkov: In heaven, we'll all speak Russian, no?
Lucas Hill: In hell, too.
Boris Volkov: [laughs heartily]
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is Siberia?Powered by Alexa
Details
Box Office
- Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
- 636.366 $
- Laufzeit
- 1 Std. 44 Min.(104 min)
- Farbe
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen