IMDb-BEWERTUNG
4,5/10
2072
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Kirill führt ein schönes Leben: Er ist jung, und verdient als Computerspiel-Designer viel Geld. Doch dieses Leben ist vorbei, als er plötzlich bemerkt, dass eine fremde Frau in seiner Wohnun... Alles lesenKirill führt ein schönes Leben: Er ist jung, und verdient als Computerspiel-Designer viel Geld. Doch dieses Leben ist vorbei, als er plötzlich bemerkt, dass eine fremde Frau in seiner Wohnung lebt und sich niemand an ihn erinnern kann.Kirill führt ein schönes Leben: Er ist jung, und verdient als Computerspiel-Designer viel Geld. Doch dieses Leben ist vorbei, als er plötzlich bemerkt, dass eine fremde Frau in seiner Wohnung lebt und sich niemand an ihn erinnern kann.
- Auszeichnungen
- 1 Nominierung insgesamt
Dmitry Khrustalev
- Member of the commission
- (as Dmitriy Khrustalyov)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
I gave this film a chance, it took me a while to absorb the story and the theme, or the theme in general. To begin with, I have to write about the good sides of this film, and that is the theme, which is unique and has its own originality, that is actually the only good thing in this film. And now what I don't like. The actors do their work stiffly and unimpressively. The visual and audio performance is below average, some visual effects are good, but some are like watching a theater play (the moment when you know that the stone is made of cardboard in some scenes). Although the original and potentially interesting theme here is so sketchy, full of holes, inexplicable and stupid situations, almost the entire film you are lost and not in a positive way. Another major problem of this film is the duration of the film, the topic is big and there is a lot to process and process, show and explain, in this film it is all packed into a short period of time and in a hurry, and that is never good. Sometimes it's sad when someone discovers something new, something original and of great potential, and then it's not shown properly on the screen to the viewer.
Sergey Lukyanenko's books are a treasure trove of ideas, and should lend themselves well to adaptations. Night Watch was a good one. Chernovik, however, is a mess. Too much has been crammed into a single movie. The visuals are spectacularly, but the numbers of characters, worlds, the weird transitions, the lack of character development or even fleshing, makes it nearly impossible to follow. Paradoxaly, the rhythm lulls several times in the movie, and keeping attention is difficult. Too bad.
I know nothing of the books, but shouldn't need to if the script was tight. It was not.
The main character's bizarre obsession with one woman and seemingly effortless adjustment to his new surreal job and surroundings had me rewinding several times, certain I'd missed something that explained what was happening.
I had not.
Also, none of the frequent Russian text displayed on the screen is translated, which is super annoying.
Don't let a few interesting visuals in the previews fool you. The rest are embarrassingly bad.
The main character's bizarre obsession with one woman and seemingly effortless adjustment to his new surreal job and surroundings had me rewinding several times, certain I'd missed something that explained what was happening.
I had not.
Also, none of the frequent Russian text displayed on the screen is translated, which is super annoying.
Don't let a few interesting visuals in the previews fool you. The rest are embarrassingly bad.
Film without the slightest sense, poorly written and with an avalanche of both logical and plot holes. In general the film opens very well giving you a very good introduction that makes you empathize with the protagonist and makes you enter completely into the story, but after the beginning the film begins to decline in quality, meaning and continuity as if they had lost the desire to make the film, and in the end you wonder how it could have happened to this film to degenerate in this way.
As a big fan of Lukjanenko, the author of the book and the book itself, I so wished the movie would be any good. But unfortunately it isn't. And I am very sad to give this review
First of all I would like to thank the author for a great story. For some reasons this book puts me in a special mental state, so I have listened to an audio version of it more than enough to know the story by heart.
Now about the movie. My major complain goes to the screenwriter. Almost all story lines and characters, including the main ones were changed so heavily, that the whole thing stopped to make any sense after the first 30 minutes of the movie. I probably said "whaat the hell??" 100 times watching the movie. Somehow, to my regret, bad screenwriting became an epidemic in the russian movie industry. It's like they think that if they add some visual effects to the movie, they are justified to make a sloppy work on the story, which is what a good movie is actually always about. Common guys, that is just a lazy thinking!
Ok, you might say that I am biased by the book and it's always difficult to convert a book to a movie. So what if you haven't read the book? To that I would say - it will be even worse to watch, because you will just fail to understand what the hell is going on. Characters suddenly start talking about things and calling names you've never heard before. In my opinion you will not understand motivations and the logic, so you will be left to sit and wonder who is doing what and why.
My advise - skip the movie, read or listen the book.
First of all I would like to thank the author for a great story. For some reasons this book puts me in a special mental state, so I have listened to an audio version of it more than enough to know the story by heart.
Now about the movie. My major complain goes to the screenwriter. Almost all story lines and characters, including the main ones were changed so heavily, that the whole thing stopped to make any sense after the first 30 minutes of the movie. I probably said "whaat the hell??" 100 times watching the movie. Somehow, to my regret, bad screenwriting became an epidemic in the russian movie industry. It's like they think that if they add some visual effects to the movie, they are justified to make a sloppy work on the story, which is what a good movie is actually always about. Common guys, that is just a lazy thinking!
Ok, you might say that I am biased by the book and it's always difficult to convert a book to a movie. So what if you haven't read the book? To that I would say - it will be even worse to watch, because you will just fail to understand what the hell is going on. Characters suddenly start talking about things and calling names you've never heard before. In my opinion you will not understand motivations and the logic, so you will be left to sit and wonder who is doing what and why.
My advise - skip the movie, read or listen the book.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesSergey Lukyanenko: the author of the original book, in the scene when Kiril takes the metro to his parents.
- VerbindungenReferenced in Vecherniy Urgant: Yuliya Peresild/Sergei Lukyanenko/Gluk'oZa/ST (2018)
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is A Rough Draft?Powered by Alexa
Details
Box Office
- Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
- 3.403.050 $
- Laufzeit
- 1 Std. 56 Min.(116 min)
- Farbe
- Seitenverhältnis
- 2.35 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen