Diminuendo

I don't know what people were expecting from this film, but if you want a sci fi romp with a sexy robot, this will disappoint. At first, I was disappointed, but it ended up being a satisfying reverie on memory, projection and responsibility. Hatch's saggy old face is good to see. Some of the action is stupid, but consistent with the stupidity and cowardice of the characters. Emotional courage and cowardice is another one of the the themes explored in the film. If you like thinking and feeling at the same time, you may like this well-crafted film.

He should have porked this robot. He could have had like 10 of them if the movie was a success and sales were good as a result. Instead he decides to end it all. Seems really pointless.

I feel a film should take you on a journey. Diminuendo does precisely that. Even before we are given the full premise, it sets a mood which I was very much on board for. Subsequently, I found myself quite eager to see where this film was going to take me, as things developed.

The primary cast is exceptional. Richard Hatch in particular. I must admit, I was a fan of his long before this. I feel it is one of his best performances. And as it was his last film, it is one he could be proud of. Granted, I've not often seen him in roles that provided this much opportunity to show his talent. Certainly not to this degree.

There's a B plot which involves an unlikable character, which is. . .well, unlikable. I found the b plot pay off very amusing. It was also well placed, as it followed some rather weighty moments of quiet desperation with Hatch's character, Calvin. In fact, his entire performance, the situation his character finds himself in, and how the director, Adrian Stewart, manages to expose everything Calvin is experiencing. . .

I was quite deliberate in my use of the word "expose." If you have lost someone close to you, there may be recognizable moments here. Director Stewart manages to bring us to a deeper place with Calvin. There's the expected, which is seen externally, but Stewart is hauntingly faithful with what only we see inside. And if you've experienced this, both are like a knife to the heart. Both can bring you to your knees.

I can't speak to what another's reaction might be. All I can say is that this film can feel more personal than most. Some films have scenes described as being "hyper-real." What Stewart does with Diminuendo is color outside of the lines of the Hollywood "hyper-real," resulting in the "real."

There's a particular shot that I would very much like to praise here, but to make note of it may also spoil it.

I'm not so singular that I believe my distinct response to this film at times will be unique. I do see this being a personal, more relatable film experience for many who watch it. Particularly for those who carry someone with them. And eventually. . .don't we all?

In short: If you liked Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind (2004) chances are more than good that you will like this one. It's simply a well crafted low budget movie. There are usually less than a handful of these done every year, this is indeed one of those. And even though it contains clichés, it does have originality.

In longer: It has alot of emotion woven in and a trembling performance that grows stronger towards the end by the lead. Yes there are bad acting in it and it touches on come clichés, but it doesn't fall into them, neither does it become another Her (2013) (or earlier version on the subject). It feels very realistic and some of the detriments of the movie really plays into it well making the result alot stronger. If you got patience to look behind the initial flaws and to watch a slow paced drama you will be rewarded by how it is sewn together. The cinematographical language is good, the use of lights is well done and the sound is well above anticipated. When it comes to the sideplot to the deeper story it isn't as well produced, but feels rather as a realistic depiction (doesn't disturb too much).

Pro's

• Script.
• Editing.
• Lead.

Con's

• Clichés near the start might get many to put down the movie.
• A couple of moments could have differed.
• The "Casanova" sidestory was overdeveloped.

End notes: Everyone dies as individuals, but you can die alone together.

I liked it. I don't understand the bad reviews. First of all, I had no clue who played Haskell until I looked him up. Second, I knew the face but not the actor's name. Finally, I didn't know he is dead. Hatch did a great job, and so did Koeing. Overall the film was well acted with some humerous moments, albeit revolting, put forth by the male lead in the film. And the film is less science fiction than it is about love loss and mental health, the depth of emotional devistation and desperation one goes through when great love is ripped from one's life.