IMDb-BEWERTUNG
5,2/10
11.160
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Ein 14.000 Jahre alter Hochschulprofessor bemerkt, dass er endlich Anzeichen des Alterns zeigt. In der Zwischenzeit werden vier seiner Studenten misstrauisch und beginnen, seine Vergangenhei... Alles lesenEin 14.000 Jahre alter Hochschulprofessor bemerkt, dass er endlich Anzeichen des Alterns zeigt. In der Zwischenzeit werden vier seiner Studenten misstrauisch und beginnen, seine Vergangenheit zu untersuchen.Ein 14.000 Jahre alter Hochschulprofessor bemerkt, dass er endlich Anzeichen des Alterns zeigt. In der Zwischenzeit werden vier seiner Studenten misstrauisch und beginnen, seine Vergangenheit zu untersuchen.
- Auszeichnungen
- 3 Nominierungen insgesamt
Ellen Crawford
- Edith
- (Archivfilmmaterial)
Annika Peterson
- Sandy
- (Archivfilmmaterial)
Ricky Crawford
- Garcetti
- (as Rick Crawford)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
"The Man from Earth" is one of my favorite movies. It is a masterful story, and David Lee Smith's portrayal of a man who was ultimately looking for a debate with other scholars held me fast. It is, however, a standalone film that has no need for a sequel.
Cut to "The Man from Earth: Holocene", which can be forgiven for the no-budget presentation (heck, the first movie looked worse), and even though the actors typically have dialog that isn't insultingly bad, their lack of physical investment in WHAT they are saying truly IS bad. It can be frustrating to watch actors talking, while their arms are wrapped around their torso awkwardly, or they stand around with their arms at their sides, with body language that negates what is being SAID.
Worst of all, this movie takes one of the more uninteresting aspects of John Oldman's debates about his past, and decides to dedicate an entire movie to that single concept of who he was, or what he did during a small sliver of time. Near the halfway point of this movie, it goes from "I don't get why this movie is being made, but fine, whatever" to "Oh hell naw! No you DIDN'T!"
John ends up being forced to debate with one of his students, in a predicament that John shouldn't have been put into in the first place. This half hour is dreadful. It makes those who might be in the student's favor look like idiots. Whether or not I believe with either party's opinion, I think the third act should only have been considered during a rough draft discussion, then laughed off and tossed aside. never to be written into a screenplay. The "debate" and discussion that proceeds for most of the rest of the movie manages to delve deeper into a downward spiral of insipid immaturity, and every character makes the WRONG decision when it's time to act. My initial impression about a sequel to "The Man from Earth" could not have been more right: Just Let It Be. Don't Touch It. Instead, this sequel was made, and ended up puking on the unique storytelling mastery of the first movie. Skip it. Watch the first one again.
Cut to "The Man from Earth: Holocene", which can be forgiven for the no-budget presentation (heck, the first movie looked worse), and even though the actors typically have dialog that isn't insultingly bad, their lack of physical investment in WHAT they are saying truly IS bad. It can be frustrating to watch actors talking, while their arms are wrapped around their torso awkwardly, or they stand around with their arms at their sides, with body language that negates what is being SAID.
Worst of all, this movie takes one of the more uninteresting aspects of John Oldman's debates about his past, and decides to dedicate an entire movie to that single concept of who he was, or what he did during a small sliver of time. Near the halfway point of this movie, it goes from "I don't get why this movie is being made, but fine, whatever" to "Oh hell naw! No you DIDN'T!"
John ends up being forced to debate with one of his students, in a predicament that John shouldn't have been put into in the first place. This half hour is dreadful. It makes those who might be in the student's favor look like idiots. Whether or not I believe with either party's opinion, I think the third act should only have been considered during a rough draft discussion, then laughed off and tossed aside. never to be written into a screenplay. The "debate" and discussion that proceeds for most of the rest of the movie manages to delve deeper into a downward spiral of insipid immaturity, and every character makes the WRONG decision when it's time to act. My initial impression about a sequel to "The Man from Earth" could not have been more right: Just Let It Be. Don't Touch It. Instead, this sequel was made, and ended up puking on the unique storytelling mastery of the first movie. Skip it. Watch the first one again.
- As a bonus, there's a mid-credit scene that hints at a sequel. One that is guaranteed to dive deeper into that hole in which rabbits probably poop into.
What a disappointment. I was lured by the title "The Man from Earth" but didn't pay too much to the appendix word "Holocene" behind it. When I peaked my interest to watch it, then the "Holo..." of that word suddenly became "HollowScene". What a lousy sequel, man. It totally ruined my good memory of the original one. With some very annoying and unlikable college students, especially that pretentious and disgusting white girl's performance, this film has simply turned into a disastrous, shallow, predictable, torturous, absolutely unwatchable B movie. This film does not deserve a long review, so I rest my case.
Movie is watchable, and thats all. No compelling story, no atmopshere, music didnt fit. Students acting was hard to watch, and the ending ruined it all for me. First one wich i consider one of the best movies ever made i could watch all day and night but this one i will erase from my memory. 5 is generous
IMHO first movie was everything: Interesting, clever, intriguing, intelligent, captivating, just continue with superlatives...
Heck, I registered here just to be able to rate it, and I've praised it to my friends. Most of them liked it as well.
I was thrilled when I've heard about this sequel and I was eager to watch it.
Now I would like to un-watch it, because it was completely unnecessary, it actually destroyed mystique of first movie.
After a very interesting first movie that continously gave something to think about while watching the sequel is an uninteresting investigation story with boring student characters. This spoiled the shining of the first one. I was watching with great excitement expecting something to be formed but nothing did. And the endcredit scene was a very lame one. Such an uninteresting story. The first one is the one to watch. This one just skip.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesThe film was released on file sharing sites by the director Richard Schenkman, who stated, "In order to make sure that every single person in the world who wants to see the movie has access to stream or download it, we are uploading it ourselves to the filesharing community."
- PatzerWhile there can be "75-year-old Scotch", whiskey including Scotch varieties only age in the barrel and once bottled that age is set. So, if you have a 12-year-old malt it will always be 12 years old, even if you keep it for 75, 750 or 7500 years. A 75-year-old Scotch would be an extremely rare and exotic find, not something you would be likely to find at a garage sale.
- Crazy CreditsAfter the first credits with cave drawings, there is an additional scene that involves Arthur Jenkins and an FBI agent.
- VerbindungenFollows The Man from Earth (2007)
- SoundtracksWhat Does It All Mean
Written by Jon Cooper
Publishing: One Two Many Songs Ltd
Performed by Turtle
Courtesy of the Artist
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is The Man from Earth: Holocene?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsland
- Offizielle Standorte
- Sprache
- Auch bekannt als
- Người Bất Tử 2
- Produktionsfirma
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
Box Office
- Budget
- 300.000 $ (geschätzt)
- Bruttoertrag in den USA und Kanada
- 5.472 $
- Eröffnungswochenende in den USA und in Kanada
- 3.100 $
- 15. Okt. 2017
- Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
- 5.472 $
- Laufzeit
- 1 Std. 38 Min.(98 min)
- Farbe
- Seitenverhältnis
- 1.78 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen