The Harvesters

And that factor is the acting ability of Sidney Flack who played his character so well it was the only part of this horrible effort that was in any way worth watching, unfortunately his character was not given enough time or material to cover up the rest of this slow, boring, awfully acted excuse for a movie, don't waste your time.

Clearly some actual effort went into this low budget production. The introduction starts off strong with shots and text font remaniscent of the original Halloween films and sets up this movie well. Unfortunately after this comes a very slow film.

The actors tried their best but unfortunately the plot is nothing special, and is the same plot you can find in some other classic films (won't spoil anything). The film also spends way too long building up to the action at the end, so the film wasn't really able to hold my attention.

To look on the positives of this film, unlike some other low budget films this one actually did a fairly decent job at building up horror in key moments due to nice looking costumes, locations and sounds design. In fact the noise made by "the murderers" in this film almost made me bump the overall score to a 4/10 alone!

It would be interesting to see what the same film crew could do if they they got a larger budget and made a sequel.

I'm sorry but this movie was just way too slow and the transitions felt weird...? Jumped around a bit too much. The actors definitely tried I can give them that. I think Brenda was my favorite character.

This movie was very slow and filmed in someone's suburbaan development. All I can conclude is that it was a film school project. The actors tried, but a horror movie should build tension as it moves along. This one did not. Halfway through, and I'm cheering for the as-yet-unseen monster.

Would have been better if they cut 1 hour 29 minutes from this mess,