B&B

Though some criticise "B&B" for its leisurely pace, I found myself engrossed from the intriguing opening scene. The film avoids preaching, instead presenting both sides of the central conflict, leaving the audience to grapple with its complexities. While it may not be unforgettable, it's a satisfying watch for those who enjoy an understated thriller with surprising twists.

The true strength of "B&B" lies in its well-crafted characters. The initial depiction of the B&B owner as self-righteous is cleverly subverted by his subsequent actions. This multi-dimensionality extends to all the characters, deepening the film's intrigue. Strong performances further enhance the believability of these characters.

The film works well within its modest means, wringing life-or-death drama out of what is essentially a debate over the accuracy of one man's gaydar. The tension is palpable, and the stakes feel high despite the seemingly trivial premise. However, a more polished script and greater attention to cinematography could have elevated the film even further, adding depth and visual appeal to the story.

Despite its merits, "B&B" could have benefited from a slightly longer runtime to allow for a more fleshed-out story, potentially incorporating the hinted-at prequel. The film opens with a newspaper headline, "Homosexuals sue Christian for double bed," setting the stage for the ensuing drama.

Overall, "B&B" is recommended, particularly for those who appreciate a slow-burning mystery with shocking twists and complex characters. It might not linger in your memory, but it provides a compelling and thought-provoking experience for its audience.

I wanted to watch this because I've seen Callum Woodhouse in "The Durrells" and "All Creatures Great and Small" and wanted to see how he'd handle a more serious role. He did well, in a supporting role, but I had great difficulty in following the film. I admit I watched it on an iPad and not a TV, but the real problem was with the lighting. Almost every scene was too dark to see what was going on. I turned the brightness up, but still too dark.

As to the plot itself, it was rather convoluted. Yes, there were plot twists but the development was poor. It really could have been much better, which was disappointing because I was hoping for something more. Good actors were put in a mediocre movie.

These are not nice people.

The film is interesting however. The performances are good and there's a couple of nice twists.

It's also not preachy. It's a dark movie with lots of sex (mostly seen through night vision goggles), which may make some people uncomfortable. Still, I recommend it if your in the mood for an understated thriller.

This is an amateurish "mystery". Is it somebody's grad thesis film? The characters are one-dimensional clichés trapped in contrived situations. The wires are all showing. Too bad, because the concept could have worked, perhaps as a campy horror film.

I watched this movie twice, with about a year between viewings. It's a pretty neat thriller, with interesting subject matter and, as another viewer pointed out, a few unexpected plot twists. If you like thrillers and/or movies with gay content, check it out. Do not be put off by negative reviews by those who think they are very clever, but don't know the correct spelling of words like "farce" or the name "Igor," for example.