IMDb-BEWERTUNG
4,9/10
11.824
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Eine innigere Beziehung zwischen einem Menschen und einem Androiden testet die Grenzen der menschlichen Natur.Eine innigere Beziehung zwischen einem Menschen und einem Androiden testet die Grenzen der menschlichen Natur.Eine innigere Beziehung zwischen einem Menschen und einem Androiden testet die Grenzen der menschlichen Natur.
- Auszeichnungen
- 9 Gewinne & 7 Nominierungen insgesamt
Empfohlene Bewertungen
I TRIED to like this movie. And I watched it all the way thru but I had to make myself. I was confused for most of the movie what the theme was. The very beginning introduction about capitalism and socialism did not make much sense and was never explained or brought up again. The story is VERY vague. There is little input to allow us into the thoughts of the characters and very little conversation. I never knew what they were thinking. Every other scene was a sex scene. And in between those scenes the same scene of the android standing naked with lights moving about her was repeated over and over as well.. I suppose she was being charged? The acting was barely ok. The serbian accents made it difficult to understand what they were saying. I would of preferred the actors spoke in their native language, and provided subtitles.... maybe it would of felt more genuine.
The setting was a space ship that appeared to have 2 rooms? The corporation that was financing the trip could afford an android, but the ship looked old and dark?
This movie never came together for me. At the end I was bored to tears. No action. No plot. No theme. No story. No reason. Vague Vague Vague.
So this movie was okay... but it could have been so much more. The only reason I didn't turn it off right away is because it set a really good atmosphere with some of the shots and good sound.
Then it kind of devolves into a bland movie with bland acting, could of been really good but it just lost me after 30 mins probably would of excelled as a short film.
Then it kind of devolves into a bland movie with bland acting, could of been really good but it just lost me after 30 mins probably would of excelled as a short film.
This movie might easily be viewed as Ex Machina set in space, and it is similar in enough aspects that it is inevitable that many viewers interpret A.I. Rising as a simple re-telling.
Actually there is much more in the concept for this movie (which is really about the risk of a stilted and limited relationship between a man and woman), but the wooden performance of the male lead (at least while working in English) and the lack of exposition about the company or the mission goals means the viewer has no reason to vest interest in any aspect.
The evolution of the female android is intended to tell us more about how a woman may act in such a situation, but the camera merely observes the action and does not show the people or the moments, so we don't see or feel each moment - only deduce its intent.
The result is a bland clinical relationship movie, set in space, but with no drama or insight.
If the leads and cinematographer of Solaris (2002) were to make this movie, there would be less sex, but much much more sizzle.
Actually there is much more in the concept for this movie (which is really about the risk of a stilted and limited relationship between a man and woman), but the wooden performance of the male lead (at least while working in English) and the lack of exposition about the company or the mission goals means the viewer has no reason to vest interest in any aspect.
The evolution of the female android is intended to tell us more about how a woman may act in such a situation, but the camera merely observes the action and does not show the people or the moments, so we don't see or feel each moment - only deduce its intent.
The result is a bland clinical relationship movie, set in space, but with no drama or insight.
If the leads and cinematographer of Solaris (2002) were to make this movie, there would be less sex, but much much more sizzle.
I can see why people review this movie poorly. There is little action, No galactic battle.No grand cgi.
This is scifi from when I was a kid reading stories by Heinlein, Herbert and Asimov; watching Night Gallery and Twilight Zone. Where science and the future is used to ask questions about the human experience.
This a story about free will and consent. A man is alone on a spaceship with a female android he can use and control. Is that satisfying? What happens if the android gains free will?
If you like the old psychological sci fi and you're not a prude , you might enjoy this one. If sex and nudity offend you or you crave alot action, this isn't the movie for you..
This is scifi from when I was a kid reading stories by Heinlein, Herbert and Asimov; watching Night Gallery and Twilight Zone. Where science and the future is used to ask questions about the human experience.
This a story about free will and consent. A man is alone on a spaceship with a female android he can use and control. Is that satisfying? What happens if the android gains free will?
If you like the old psychological sci fi and you're not a prude , you might enjoy this one. If sex and nudity offend you or you crave alot action, this isn't the movie for you..
Following on the success of Ex Machina (2014) and Her (2013), this is an Eastern European version. Done on a very modest budget, the movie had surprising good production values.
The cinematography was artistic, sets were futuristic, and lighting was set for effect.
The movie's bleak tone is similar to Kubrick's 2001. An astronaut grappling with loneliness, with only artificial intelligences for companions.
This plot takes the premise a step further. What about his sexual needs? What kind of social dynamics govern a relationship with an android? Out in space, they are alone.
What would the viewer do if placed in the situation of the protagonist?
The surprise was the casting of pornstar Stoya who turned in a good performance as lover, submissive and sex toy. No blonde bimbo. She has a pretty face and lean body, like the girl next door. Definitely sexy.
IMO, worth a second screening.
The cinematography was artistic, sets were futuristic, and lighting was set for effect.
The movie's bleak tone is similar to Kubrick's 2001. An astronaut grappling with loneliness, with only artificial intelligences for companions.
This plot takes the premise a step further. What about his sexual needs? What kind of social dynamics govern a relationship with an android? Out in space, they are alone.
What would the viewer do if placed in the situation of the protagonist?
The surprise was the casting of pornstar Stoya who turned in a good performance as lover, submissive and sex toy. No blonde bimbo. She has a pretty face and lean body, like the girl next door. Definitely sexy.
IMO, worth a second screening.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesAt 4:18 the Social Engineer refers to Asimov's laws which follow: First Law: A robot may not injure a human being, or through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm. Second Law: A robot must obey orders given to it except where such orders would conflict with the First Law. Third Law: A robot must protect its own existence as long as that protection does not conflict with the First or Second Laws. The laws were published in science fiction writer Isaac Asimov's 1950 collection "I, Robot".
- Zitate
Milutin: I activated Nimani. She looks very lifelike, once you typed in whatever you wanted. Her behavior is not natural. It's just a setup after setup. She does everything you want, but you don't have to fight for it. Don't get to deserve it, just a series of submissions. I don't think you can have a relationship without any refusal, any struggle.
- VerbindungenReferences Solaris (1972)
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is A.I. Rising?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Laufzeit
- 1 Std. 25 Min.(85 min)
- Farbe
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen