Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuAstronaut Kathryn Voss, sole survivor of a disastrous space mission, is desperate to reunite with her terminally ill daughter but becomes a fugitive when the government discovers she's retur... Alles lesenAstronaut Kathryn Voss, sole survivor of a disastrous space mission, is desperate to reunite with her terminally ill daughter but becomes a fugitive when the government discovers she's returned to earth with an extraordinary gift.Astronaut Kathryn Voss, sole survivor of a disastrous space mission, is desperate to reunite with her terminally ill daughter but becomes a fugitive when the government discovers she's returned to earth with an extraordinary gift.
- Auszeichnungen
- 1 wins total
Karen L Charlton
- Oracle
- (as Karen Charlton)
Angelic Granger
- Shan
- (as Angel Granger)
Nichole LeShawn
- Nurse Bianca
- (as Nichole Le Shawn)
Jay D. Henderson
- Geoff Taylor
- (as Jay Henderson)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
You cannot blame the writer for the movie being bad, but she contributed by writing a story that needed clarification at every step. Even the ending left the feeling that you wanted to read the original story because nothing was explained or resolved. Artsy films can leave you with different interpretation at the end but in this case it left without any interpretation. OK so much for the pretentious story but the director did not get any good acting from the actors
.i guess they were as much in the dark as we were on where this movie was going. Some movies can do a lot with little budget but this movie did not even bother to conceal that it was working on a low budget; the creepy government figures using cell phones to discuss top secret info. The super secure facility that looked like a common office building, the shoddy camera angles
.it all distracted from what was supposed to be a serious movie with a message from the stars. I tried to like the movie
I really did but the holes in the story, the poor acting and the low budget was too much to overlook.
Begin (15 minutes) is OK , even if actors' acting comes straight from B movie type. Then it gets a bit chaotic and certainly not any better acting wise. Semi technology. Would be "interesting" actors talking science stuff that is all very obvious fake, so called technology. For me a waste of time.
Here is another one of these films that is horrible but has a high score, 71% of voters scored it a 10! Will it win multiple Oscars? LOL not! Us longer term members on IMDb know that sadly ratings on IMDb have nothing to do with the truth, and any hope that we used to have on here via the forum part is a thing of the past, and makes me wonder what direction IMDb is going too, but back to this blockbuster (LOL), acting is horrible, camera work is done with a handy cam, the music stinks, with other words this film has nothing going for it. I can't really comment on the story line as I could only take about 30 minutes of this rubbish, don't waste your time on this as life is just to short.
I gave it a zero out of 10 and I am sure the score of 8.4 won't last!
I gave it a zero out of 10 and I am sure the score of 8.4 won't last!
Not only a crappy movie (Yes even for a C movie), but they had the nerves to lie about the ratings on IMDb. I hope for the sake of humankind that these people never make a movie again!!!
-Very, very Bad acting -Terrible music -No camera experience -No fantasy/inspiration what so ever
Now if it was a student film I would've been nicer, but the director is at least forty. C'Mon. I gave it one star out of ten, just for the poster. And that is being very generous.
-Very, very Bad acting -Terrible music -No camera experience -No fantasy/inspiration what so ever
Now if it was a student film I would've been nicer, but the director is at least forty. C'Mon. I gave it one star out of ten, just for the poster. And that is being very generous.
Oy.
Just way too much time spent trying to establish back story, then too little time spent establishing a "current moment" context, then all sorts of disjointed flashbacks trying to fill in missing elements. A horrid mess of filmmaking with a lot of amateur acting, writing, dialog, and other film elements.
The lead character is well played for the most part, but still can't save this mess. I watched about 2/3 of this flick before giving up (Amazon had it for free with Prime membership). Stay away. Your time is worth more than this movie delivers.
Just way too much time spent trying to establish back story, then too little time spent establishing a "current moment" context, then all sorts of disjointed flashbacks trying to fill in missing elements. A horrid mess of filmmaking with a lot of amateur acting, writing, dialog, and other film elements.
The lead character is well played for the most part, but still can't save this mess. I watched about 2/3 of this flick before giving up (Amazon had it for free with Prime membership). Stay away. Your time is worth more than this movie delivers.
Wusstest du schon
- PatzerDuring the first interview with Kathryn Voss, a boom mic is visible at the bottom of the screen.
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is One Under the Sun?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsland
- Offizielle Standorte
- Sprache
- Auch bekannt als
- Едины под Солнцем
- Drehorte
- Produktionsfirmen
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
- Laufzeit
- 1 Std. 41 Min.(101 min)
- Farbe
- Sound-Mix
- Seitenverhältnis
- 1.78 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen