The Queen of Hollywood Blvd

Orson Oblowitzs movies are fun. They aren't trying to be Citizen Kane. And, Michael Parks is in this!

Seriously, ANY Director who sought out Michael Parks gets my full respect.

Sadly Parks is very much in his twilight days here, but he's still awesome

There was a reason I mentioned Michael Parks outside of him being cool. Parks began his career appearing sometime in the early 60s and via a mix of TV roles and Hollywood movies.

By the late 1960s Michael Parks was starring in his own show 'Then Came Bronson'. For "reasons" he irked a few people and wound up appearing in lots of TV movies and some very cool independent movies, and exploitation movies.

When watching this movie I felt like Orson Oblowitzs had seen those movies, or at least some. Because he weaves a together a really cool exploitation here.

If those kind of films don't do it for you, then you might not enjoy this.

But don't down vote it because it doesn't have a huge budget or because it didn't meet whatever your expectations were.

If you watch it for what it is, and you dig these cool movies, you'll love this.

Yeah, so it's a little rough around the edges. So what? If this is the first movie this guy has ever written and directed than I think it's a success. Also his mom is killing it.

The titular Queen of the titty-bar, wizened beyond her years, Mary weaves an eccentric path through the day of her 60th birthday; a day on which she will revisit the past, engage the present, and reflect on the future. Taking its aesthetic and cinematographic queues from 60s and 70s (X)ploitation films, Queen of Hollywood Blvd maintains a coherent style, meandering through familiar and sleazy genre-appropriate tropes, imagery and lines at a syncopated but languorous pace.

Whilst derivative, it maintains interest throughout its run-time, chiefly through the colour and texture of its main character, and that of its key supporting cast. The film's greatest asset is also its greatest weakness; Rosemary Hochschild's Queen Mary is given to moments of uneven delivery, more like momentary character-drops than revealing idiosyncrasies. This issue, which could have been recovered in the editing suite, as well as the similarly easily-remedied (and brief) problems with overall cinematic cadence, is where Queen of Hollywood Blvd loses points. Pulp Fiction this film is not, but TQoHB is still an entertaining ride worth your time, if you have some to spare.

Executive summary: not a waste of time, but you won't missing a thing if you don't watch this one.

If you are a movie buff, I challenge you to the following exercise: 1. watch this movie, 2. imagine making this movie in the 1970's, with no digital cameras, no digital editing tools, no digital post-production with no Kodachrome preset... Almost every good thing in this movie is borrowed from someone else, or is accomplished only through technical means. Don't get me wrong: anyone can see that this is a movie made by talented people. But it fails to bring anything new or remotely remarkable. I guess the main problem is the plot: it's as thin as a stripper's g-string. The acting is good, but just enough. The script is good, but just enough. The dialogue... not enough. The characters... not enough. The only notable thing in this movie is the stunning beauty of the supporting actress.

I actually had it figured out from beginning to end in the first 10 minutes. There were a few turns, but no real twists. The acting was very good (thus the 7) but lacked the grittiness that would have helped to set up the ending.

Defiantly worth watching, but remember your watching an older character and actress.