[go: up one dir, main page]

    Kalender veröffentlichenDie Top 250 FilmeDie beliebtesten FilmeFilme nach Genre durchsuchenBeste KinokasseSpielzeiten und TicketsNachrichten aus dem FilmFilm im Rampenlicht Indiens
    Was läuft im Fernsehen und was kann ich streamen?Die Top 250 TV-SerienBeliebteste TV-SerienSerien nach Genre durchsuchenNachrichten im Fernsehen
    Was gibt es zu sehenAktuelle TrailerIMDb OriginalsIMDb-AuswahlIMDb SpotlightLeitfaden für FamilienunterhaltungIMDb-Podcasts
    OscarsEmmysToronto Int'l Film FestivalIMDb Stars to WatchSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAlle Ereignisse
    Heute geborenDie beliebtesten PromisPromi-News
    HilfecenterBereich für BeitragendeUmfragen
Für Branchenprofis
  • Sprache
  • Vollständig unterstützt
  • English (United States)
    Teilweise unterstützt
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Anmelden
  • Vollständig unterstützt
  • English (United States)
    Teilweise unterstützt
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
App verwenden
  • Besetzung und Crew-Mitglieder
  • Benutzerrezensionen
  • Wissenswertes
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

Störche - Abenteuer im Anflug

Originaltitel: Storks
  • 2016
  • 0
  • 1 Std. 27 Min.
IMDb-BEWERTUNG
6,8/10
70.840
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Kelsey Grammer, Keegan-Michael Key, Jordan Peele, Andy Samberg, Katie Crown, and Stephen Kramer Glickman in Störche - Abenteuer im Anflug (2016)
Storks have moved on from delivering babies to packages. But when an order for a baby appears, the best delivery stork must scramble to fix the error by delivering the baby.
trailer wiedergeben2:26
49 Videos
99+ Fotos
Buddy KomödieComputer-AnimationSlapstickTierabenteuerAbenteuerAnimationsfilmFamilieFantasieKomödie

Auch Störche haben sich weiter entwickelt. Sie liefern keine Babys mehr aus, sondern Pakete. Doch als einmal eine Bestellung für ein Baby eingeht, hat der beste Liefer-Storch alle Hände voll... Alles lesenAuch Störche haben sich weiter entwickelt. Sie liefern keine Babys mehr aus, sondern Pakete. Doch als einmal eine Bestellung für ein Baby eingeht, hat der beste Liefer-Storch alle Hände voll zu tun, den Irrtum zu beheben, und liefert das Baby aus.Auch Störche haben sich weiter entwickelt. Sie liefern keine Babys mehr aus, sondern Pakete. Doch als einmal eine Bestellung für ein Baby eingeht, hat der beste Liefer-Storch alle Hände voll zu tun, den Irrtum zu beheben, und liefert das Baby aus.

  • Regie
    • Nicholas Stoller
    • Doug Sweetland
  • Drehbuch
    • Nicholas Stoller
  • Hauptbesetzung
    • Andy Samberg
    • Katie Crown
    • Kelsey Grammer
  • Siehe Produktionsinformationen bei IMDbPro
  • IMDb-BEWERTUNG
    6,8/10
    70.840
    IHRE BEWERTUNG
    • Regie
      • Nicholas Stoller
      • Doug Sweetland
    • Drehbuch
      • Nicholas Stoller
    • Hauptbesetzung
      • Andy Samberg
      • Katie Crown
      • Kelsey Grammer
    • 146Benutzerrezensionen
    • 127Kritische Rezensionen
    • 56Metascore
  • Siehe Produktionsinformationen bei IMDbPro
    • Auszeichnungen
      • 5 Gewinne & 4 Nominierungen insgesamt

    Videos49

    Trailer #5
    Trailer 2:26
    Trailer #5
    Trailer #4
    Trailer 2:32
    Trailer #4
    Trailer #4
    Trailer 2:32
    Trailer #4
    Trailer #3
    Trailer 2:27
    Trailer #3
    Trailer #2
    Trailer 2:33
    Trailer #2
    Trailer #1
    Trailer 1:31
    Trailer #1
    International Teaser
    Trailer 1:19
    International Teaser

    Fotos166

    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen

    Topbesetzung15

    Ändern
    Andy Samberg
    Andy Samberg
    • Junior
    • (Synchronisation)
    Katie Crown
    Katie Crown
    • Tulip
    • (Synchronisation)
    Kelsey Grammer
    Kelsey Grammer
    • Hunter
    • (Synchronisation)
    Jennifer Aniston
    Jennifer Aniston
    • Sarah Gardner
    • (Synchronisation)
    Ty Burrell
    Ty Burrell
    • Henry Gardner
    • (Synchronisation)
    Anton Starkman
    Anton Starkman
    • Nate Gardner
    • (Synchronisation)
    Keegan-Michael Key
    Keegan-Michael Key
    • Alpha Wolf
    • (Synchronisation)
    Jordan Peele
    Jordan Peele
    • Beta Wolf
    • (Synchronisation)
    Danny Trejo
    Danny Trejo
    • Jasper
    • (Synchronisation)
    Stephen Kramer Glickman
    Stephen Kramer Glickman
    • Pigeon Toady
    • (Synchronisation)
    • …
    Christopher Nicholas Smith
    Christopher Nicholas Smith
    • Dougland
    • (Synchronisation)
    • (as Chris Smith)
    Awkwafina
    Awkwafina
    • Quail
    • (Synchronisation)
    Ike Barinholtz
    Ike Barinholtz
    • Miscellaneous Storks
    • (Synchronisation)
    Jorma Taccone
    Jorma Taccone
    • Miscellaneous Storks
    • (Synchronisation)
    Amanda Lund
    Amanda Lund
    • Miscellaneous Storks
    • (Synchronisation)
    • Regie
      • Nicholas Stoller
      • Doug Sweetland
    • Drehbuch
      • Nicholas Stoller
    • Komplette Besetzung und alle Crew-Mitglieder
    • Produktion, Einspielergebnisse & mehr bei IMDbPro

    Benutzerrezensionen146

    6,870.8K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Empfohlene Bewertungen

    8E22022

    Under-rated

    I hadn't watched this movie at first because I thought it looked super corny but i actually really enjoyed and have a watched it a handful of times now.

    There's definitely moments in this movie that resonated deeply with me and I'm sure it did with other parents as well especially the interaction between the stork and Tulip when the baby is up all night.

    I could have gone without the Trump haired bird character completely and I think representation of different families other families such as LGBT+ And people with different body types Would have been nice at the end during the quick shots.

    Overall I really enjoyed and the main young character other than the baby is a bit mature for his age but the reasons are valid and I think many kids in his situation would relate to this as well. I grew up with three older sister and still could relate to that feeling.

    People rate kids movies too harshly. Tbh kids really can't relate to what's on the screen for quite some time and even when they do start reaching an age where they can start grasping that information (three) they loose interests very quickly because their attentions spans are much shorter than ours. There are definitely lots of movies that are hot stinkers but this one is very cute and my daughter and I will be watching it again soon.
    8grebeigna

    Highly Underrated

    I entered to watch Storks expecting the worse. However, I got an really enjoyable movie.

    The Characters are charismatic and they have good chemistry. In Fact, I LOVED Tulip and The Wolfs were hilarious.

    If you want a funny and heart-warming film, then Storks is a great option for you.

    It's such a shame to see how uninterested was Warner in marketing this film.

    I Trust that in a few years Storks will have the recognition that it deserves, and a big fan base.
    7amnesiac12001

    Threadbare. Uneven. Underrated. HYSTERICALLY Funny.

    I found STORKS in the way that you're supposed to find underrated/cult classics: by accident. When it was released, I bought into the collective sigh of underwhelm that most critics expressed and that was my mistake. It's easy to understand why the critical community didn't like it: in an era where Pixar, Disney and even Dreamworks keep churning out magnificently multi-layered heart-warmers that set the bar stratospherically high, STORKS doesn't register all that well. We've been spoiled by excellence. As a result, we've lost the ability to enjoy the simple pleasures of pure entertainment.

    And that's what STORKS delivers better than babies or packages: entertainment.

    You might have noticed people commenting on how forced and thin the storyline is and how uneven it feels, and those complaints are accurate. The plot is extremely thin (virtually an extended sitcom-sized premise stretched into an epic road-trip format), and the story moves so quickly that it goes too far too fast with nary any breathing room to savor the experience or give the characters the tension or time to build any real catharsis or change. But the characters are so authentic to themselves that you know just about everything you need to know about them from their first scenes.

    I think the main reason STORKS gets such middling reviews in print and here on IMDb is because it's an old-fashioned type of comedy: a screwball-slapstick hybrid. The emphasis on sight gags, pain-humor, and wackiness has generally been avoided in animated films as passe and vulgar--low comedy. The rapid-fire snark between the main characters of Tulip and Junior hearken back to the old Howard Hawks workplace comedies of the 1930s, which is definitely an acquired taste in the post-narrative style of humor found in kids entertainment today--where non-sequiturs and punchlines exist in a vacuum and visual comedy is derived from abstraction rather than plasticity. But the comedic energy and the variety of jokes from modern "Office"-style cringe (Pigeon Toady) to the machine-gun-speed HIS GIRL FRIDAYy-style verbal sparring (Tulip & Junior), absurdism (the wolves), post-modern meta-humor (the boy and his parents) to classical WB slapstick of yesteryear, and the film is riotously funny because of it. At the end of the day, that's what STORKS wants to be: FUNNY.

    STORKS is not a great film. It's not a masterpiece like TOY STORY or UP. It won't win any Oscars and it won't be everyone's cup of tea. But there's an excellent chance that it will live on as a multi-generational favorite for the same reasons as dumb-fun-with-a-heart-of-gold treasures like SPACEBALLS, DUMB & DUMBER, THE NAKED GUN, and NATIONAL LAMPOONS CHRISTMASs VACATION:

    Because you can watch it 1,000 times and it will NEVER stop being funny.

    So try it out. There's a 50-50 chance you'll be among the ones who can't stop watching it.
    7nickyeskens

    Big surprise

    Storks wasn't specifically on my watch list. I had seen ads here and there, but it seemed to get overshadowed with the release of other movies. When i got the chance to watch it on a flight, i took it. Mostly because there was nothing else to watch. I ended up laughing out loud a couple of times and being charmed by some of the characters.

    The movie was cute and a little awkward at times, and had a fun and not too serious premise. The awkwardness is especially what drew me in. This movie might not be for everyone, the comedy might be a bit too obvious and cringy, and kids might not understand the humor at times. I personally don't think those are bad things, since i enjoy that type of humor. The voice acting was okay. I mean Andy Samberg was Andy Samberg and Ty Burell was Ty Burell. I enjoy both actors very much, but it made it hard for me to get into their characters. Stephen Kramer Glickman, Kelsey Grammar and Danny Trejo were outstanding in their performance.

    Overall this movie was a fun ride, and took me by surprise. I got a little lost in the storytelling sometimes, and wasn't sure what 'message' they were trying to convey. But overall it was enjoyable and cute, and not every movie needs a 'message'. I'm not sure if every kid will enjoy this movie, but i think adults who like awkward humor and great animation (I forgot to mention that) will enjoy this movie. This movie is definitely underrated and got drowned out by other (hyped) animated movies that got released around the same time.

    7,5
    7jay-techie2007

    Well-made movie with good animation and super score on cuteness factor

    Storks is undoubtedly funny and keeps up with the audience attention just enough in spite of an at par performance in pretty much all departments. The movie doesn't have any wow factor, except for the "baby cuteness", but I didn't find it bad either.

    Story (7/10): I've heard about this concept for the first time, but apparently, storks, in some mythologies, are associated with baby delivery and that's what the story is about. In the modern times, though, they have moved away from baby delivery to cell phones. However, in a dramatic turn of events, one of the soon-to-be-boss storks, Junior, is unable to prevent the restart of a baby-making machine by Tulip - the only human at the facility, which creates a baby. Along with Tulip, he has to not just hide it from the rest of the storks at the facility, but also deliver the baby. And in that process, he has to prevent the babies from external enemies as well. I didn't find the story so exciting but what I liked about it was the screenplay that had good punches - although inexplicable on some occasions. What I also loved the most was some of the innovative stuff with wolves and penguins, which was innovative and great to watch. The characterization of Tulip and establishing her chemistry with Junior was a little tricky but the writer managed to do it pretty much smoothly without making it looked forced. Overall, a pretty neat job by Nicholas Stoller.

    Animation (8/10): The animation is really good, especially the ones on creating various baby faces and expressions. It was pretty much like they poured in all of their energy into that. Also, the work around landscaping and making the entire visual very colorful is great.

    Direction (7/10): The combination of Nicholas Stoller and Doug Sweetland has pulled out quite well. While the former hasn't had a great run with the movies yet, Doug's experience with the animation movies seems to have come handy, even though it was a first time for him. The idea of getting wolves creating amazing shapes - totally fitting into the context of the story - and the silent fight with the penguins was great. However, the direction could have improved in the beginning of the movie, which was a little slow and low on momentum.

    Overall (7/10): A well-made movie with good animation and super score on cuteness factor!

    Mehr wie diese

    Die Abenteuer von Mr. Peabody & Sherman
    6,7
    Die Abenteuer von Mr. Peabody & Sherman
    Smallfoot - Ein eisigartiges Abenteuer
    6,6
    Smallfoot - Ein eisigartiges Abenteuer
    Ferdinand: Geht STIERisch ab!
    6,7
    Ferdinand: Geht STIERisch ab!
    Home - Ein smektakulärer Trip
    6,5
    Home - Ein smektakulärer Trip
    The Boss Baby
    6,3
    The Boss Baby
    Epic - Verborgenes Königreich
    6,6
    Epic - Verborgenes Königreich
    Arlo & Spot
    6,7
    Arlo & Spot
    Angry Birds 2: Der Film
    6,4
    Angry Birds 2: Der Film
    Angry Birds - Der Film
    6,3
    Angry Birds - Der Film
    Pigeon Toady's Guide to Your New Baby
    5,8
    Pigeon Toady's Guide to Your New Baby
    Pets
    6,5
    Pets
    Wolkig mit Aussicht auf Fleischbällchen 2
    6,3
    Wolkig mit Aussicht auf Fleischbällchen 2

    Verwandte Interessen

    Steve Martin and John Candy in Ein Ticket für zwei (1987)
    Buddy Komödie
    Tom Hanks and Tim Allen in Toy Story (1995)
    Computer-Animation
    Leslie Nielsen in Die nackte Kanone (1988)
    Slapstick
    Ben Whishaw in Paddington (2014)
    Tierabenteuer
    Still frame
    Abenteuer
    Daveigh Chase, Rumi Hiiragi, and Mari Natsuki in Chihiros Reise ins Zauberland (2001)
    Animationsfilm
    Drew Barrymore and Pat Welsh in E.T. - Der Außerirdische (1982)
    Familie
    Elijah Wood in Der Herr der Ringe: Die Gefährten (2001)
    Fantasie
    Will Ferrell in Anchorman - Die Legende von Ron Burgundy (2004)
    Komödie

    Handlung

    Ändern

    Wusstest du schon

    Ändern
    • Wissenswertes
      Andy Samberg uses the signature "cool...cool cool cool cool cool cool" of his character Jake Peralta in Brooklyn 99.
    • Patzer
      While Pigeon Toady is in the tundra, he encounters what appears to be a baboon. While baboons only live in Africa and Saudi Arabia and not the tundra, the animal in the film is actually a Japanese macaque. While technically not a tundra animal, but native of the forest regions of Japan, macaques use natural hot water springs to bath -as shown in the movie- during Japanese freezing winter temperatures and have been nicknamed "snow monkeys".
    • Zitate

      [Junior, Tulip and Diamond get across a bridge and cut it so that the Wolf Pack can't get across]

      Junior: Suck it, wolves!

      Alpha Wolf: Wolf Pack, form of wolf bridge!

      [the wolves start climbing on each other]

      Junior: What is happening?

      Tulip: The wolves are forming a suspension bridge.

      Junior: How is that possible?

      Tulip: I don't know.

    • Crazy Credits
      Part of the closing credits appears in a montage of baby photos.
    • Verbindungen
      Featured in Conan: Andy Samberg/Portia Doubleday/St. Paul & the Broken Bones (2016)
    • Soundtracks
      Good Day
      Written by Justin Tranter, Robin Fredriksson (as Robin Lennart Fredriksson), Mattias Larsson (as Mattias Per Larsson) and Joe Jonas

      Performed by DNCE

      Courtesy of Republic Records

      Under license from Universal Music Enterprises

    Top-Auswahl

    Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
    Anmelden

    FAQ20

    • How long is Storks?Powered by Alexa

    Details

    Ändern
    • Erscheinungsdatum
      • 27. Oktober 2016 (Deutschland)
    • Herkunftsländer
      • Vereinigte Staaten
      • Kanada
    • Offizieller Standort
      • Official site
    • Sprache
      • Englisch
    • Auch bekannt als
      • Cigüeñas: La historia que no te contaron
    • Produktionsfirmen
      • Warner Bros.
      • Lord Miller
      • RatPac-Dune Entertainment
    • Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen

    Box Office

    Ändern
    • Budget
      • 70.000.000 $ (geschätzt)
    • Bruttoertrag in den USA und Kanada
      • 72.800.603 $
    • Eröffnungswochenende in den USA und in Kanada
      • 21.311.407 $
      • 25. Sept. 2016
    • Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
      • 183.800.603 $
    Weitere Informationen zur Box Office finden Sie auf IMDbPro.

    Technische Daten

    Ändern
    • Laufzeit
      • 1 Std. 27 Min.(87 min)
    • Farbe
      • Color
    • Sound-Mix
      • Dolby Digital
      • Dolby Atmos
      • Dolby Surround 7.1
      • SDDS
    • Seitenverhältnis
      • 2.35 : 1
      • 2.39 : 1

    Zu dieser Seite beitragen

    Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen
    • Erfahre mehr über das Beitragen
    Seite bearbeiten

    Mehr entdecken

    Zuletzt angesehen

    Bitte aktiviere Browser-Cookies, um diese Funktion nutzen zu können. Weitere Informationen
    Hol dir die IMDb-App
    Melde dich an für Zugriff auf mehr InhalteMelde dich an für Zugriff auf mehr Inhalte
    Folge IMDb in den sozialen Netzwerken
    Hol dir die IMDb-App
    Für Android und iOS
    Hol dir die IMDb-App
    • Hilfe
    • Inhaltsverzeichnis
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • IMDb-Daten lizenzieren
    • Pressezimmer
    • Werbung
    • Jobs
    • Allgemeine Geschäftsbedingungen
    • Datenschutzrichtlinie
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, ein Amazon-Unternehmen

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.