[go: up one dir, main page]

    Kalender veröffentlichenDie Top 250 FilmeDie beliebtesten FilmeFilme nach Genre durchsuchenBeste KinokasseSpielzeiten und TicketsNachrichten aus dem FilmFilm im Rampenlicht Indiens
    Was läuft im Fernsehen und was kann ich streamen?Die Top 250 TV-SerienBeliebteste TV-SerienSerien nach Genre durchsuchenNachrichten im Fernsehen
    Was gibt es zu sehenAktuelle TrailerIMDb OriginalsIMDb-AuswahlIMDb SpotlightLeitfaden für FamilienunterhaltungIMDb-Podcasts
    EmmysSuperheroes GuideSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideBest Of 2025 So FarDisability Pride MonthSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAlle Ereignisse
    Heute geborenDie beliebtesten PromisPromi-News
    HilfecenterBereich für BeitragendeUmfragen
Für Branchenprofis
  • Sprache
  • Vollständig unterstützt
  • English (United States)
    Teilweise unterstützt
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Anmelden
  • Vollständig unterstützt
  • English (United States)
    Teilweise unterstützt
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
App verwenden
  • Besetzung und Crew-Mitglieder
  • Benutzerrezensionen
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

Aux

  • 2018
  • 1 Std. 23 Min.
IMDb-BEWERTUNG
4,3/10
438
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Aux (2018)
ActionHorrorThriller

Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuWhen two young boys playing in the woods discover a military bunker they unintentionally release the ghost of World War II auxiliary soldier who mistakenly believes the Nazis have landed.When two young boys playing in the woods discover a military bunker they unintentionally release the ghost of World War II auxiliary soldier who mistakenly believes the Nazis have landed.When two young boys playing in the woods discover a military bunker they unintentionally release the ghost of World War II auxiliary soldier who mistakenly believes the Nazis have landed.

  • Regie
    • John Adams
  • Drehbuch
    • John Adams
    • Peter Adams
  • Hauptbesetzung
    • John Rhys-Davies
    • Chris Wilson
    • James Fisher
  • Siehe Produktionsinformationen bei IMDbPro
  • IMDb-BEWERTUNG
    4,3/10
    438
    IHRE BEWERTUNG
    • Regie
      • John Adams
    • Drehbuch
      • John Adams
      • Peter Adams
    • Hauptbesetzung
      • John Rhys-Davies
      • Chris Wilson
      • James Fisher
    • 15Benutzerrezensionen
    • 12Kritische Rezensionen
  • Siehe Produktionsinformationen bei IMDbPro
  • Siehe Produktionsinformationen bei IMDbPro
    • Auszeichnungen
      • 1 wins total

    Fotos11

    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    + 8
    Poster ansehen

    Topbesetzung71

    Ändern
    John Rhys-Davies
    John Rhys-Davies
    • Jack
    Chris Wilson
    Chris Wilson
    • Truck Driver
    James Fisher
    James Fisher
    • Police Patrol Constable
    Tanya Franks
    Tanya Franks
    • Jane Dale
    Paul Reynolds
    Paul Reynolds
    • DI Reed
    Theo Devaney
    Theo Devaney
    • EOD Officer
    Gary Mavers
    Gary Mavers
    • Carter
    Anniwaa Buachie
    Anniwaa Buachie
    • Private Beverley
    Rosie Fellner
    Rosie Fellner
    • Samantha Huntley
    Amy Kingsmill
    • Nicole
    Peter Landi
    Peter Landi
    • Doctor Phillips
    Jack Derges
    Jack Derges
    • Captain Grant
    Patrick Pearson
    • Senior Army Officer
    Sally Mortemore
    Sally Mortemore
    • Mrs. Roberts
    Henry Douthwaite
    • Police Dog Handler
    Charlie Mann
    Charlie Mann
    • Archie
    • (as Charles Mann)
    David Broughton-Davies
    David Broughton-Davies
    • Home Secretary
    Michael Elkin
    • Armed Police Officer
    • Regie
      • John Adams
    • Drehbuch
      • John Adams
      • Peter Adams
    • Komplette Besetzung und alle Crew-Mitglieder
    • Produktion, Einspielergebnisse & mehr bei IMDbPro

    Benutzerrezensionen15

    4,3438
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Empfohlene Bewertungen

    info-45963

    Fantastic Concept - Suffers From Budget Limitations

    I would love to be able to give this film a ten because the premise is actually really smart, but it gets let down by not having the resources to deliver the scale and quality of effects needed to do the idea justice. It starts as a slasher film but quickly hints at supernatural undertones and neatly meshes the slasher/creature genres until the twist. No spoilers but John Rhys-Davies (who is as always superb here - "Nobody tosses a dwarf!") provides a chilling monologue that grounds the story in the true history of WWII, delivered in a way that is emotive, thought provoking and entirely unusual in this type of movie! I was utterly hooked from the first ten minutes, which are basically non-stop action, but the WWII hook really grabbed me and had me on the edge of my seat for the last act (basically an advance to battle which would've benefitted from a lot more troops!) I was still thinking about the story the next day and looked a few of the facts up on Google to check if stuff mentioned in the film really happened. Really recommend checking this out as long as you can look past its budget restrictions. Would love to see this concept remade with more money.
    1KenAdamFan

    AUXFUL

    Nothing to redeem this catastrophe. The reason why extremely-low-budget British films are generally avoided and laughed at.
    6borgolarici

    Very flawed yet likeable

    Aux is low budget movie and it shows: there are too many scenes where people do nothing but talk, the special effects are pretty lame and the locations are mostly exteriors (a wood).

    Yet, I found it weirdly likeable: it's surprisingly well acted, the core concept is good (despite some illogicalities) and the zombie has a moving backstory. Overall it's a small project that gives its best and certainly not the worst WWII zombie movie out there.
    6S1rr34l

    Not A Great Horror Film... But Strangely Entertaining And Pleasing...

    My Ratings: Story 1.00 : Direction 1.25 : Pace 1.25 : Acting 1.25 : Entertaining 1.50 Total 6.25 out of 10.00

    As I've stated in many reviews, I do like a good surprise. The surprise here was how much I enjoyed this film. Especially as the story has some glaringly weak points, and the film is shot in digital and not analogue, and some of the acting is as wooden as it can get.

    The story is about a forgotten soldier from World War II. Dead and abandoned in a secret underground bunker. That is, until two teenage boys, hunting squirrels, rabbits, and the like, literally stumble across the hidden opening. Well, I guess you know what happens next(?) That's right; they go home and live happily ever after... Well, not quite. Only one lad makes it home... er... I'm lying again, he only makes it to the hospital... before he too karks it.

    From here on out, chaos, murder, and mayhem are the rule of the day.

    The element I liked, in particular, was the killings. More rightly, their motivation and implementation. This lifts the film a smidgen out of The Slasher sub-genre. This killer is trained in guerrilla warfare and psychology. This is highlighted best in the scene where the missing woman has been stripped, scalped, and hung between two trees for the soldiers and the police to discover. However, I didn't think the concept was utilised fully throughout the story.

    Another good component was the characters and their traits and peculiarities. Predominantly, these characters are believable and relatable. I loved the female PC who, after the boy's hospitalisation, wanted to search for his friend; though "The Friend" could have been a figment of his imagination. The scene between the two coppers as she asks permission is true and empathetic. I could see myself in this woman's actions.

    There's also the officious, sanctimonious, and sarcastic jerk of a boss, in the form of DI Reed. This guy is so well written by John and Peter Adams, and portrayed by Paul Reynolds, you want the soldier to do his dirty work with him.

    However, there are some serious structure and plotting issues too. When the lad in the hospital dies, it's the doctor who passes on the last words to the detectives. Except it's more like a soliloquy rather than his dying breath. This would have worked better had we seen the boy acting out his death scene. As it stands, all I could think was, Yeah! Right!

    There's also a heavy-handed and awkward scene between the missing boy's parents and the cops. I had the impression the Adams brothers were making a sarcastic statement about the state of the youth and parenting habits of today. Especially when the unconcerned Ma and Pa state, "They're teenagers! They do what they want nowadays." It didn't help that the parents were actors from the wooden school of acting either.

    The most heinous thing about the story is the reason soldier Bob Pierce is still active and enlivened. He REALLY hates Nazi's. Oh, God! Couldn't they have at least used the oldie-but-goodie, the super-secret reanimating gas the defence department developed? This is a major flaw in the storytelling. As is the soldier's demise - just to warn you.

    Now, I have stated I don't like digital media and I still don't. It gives the film a cheapness and an amateurish look. This film would have looked so much better, either shot on film stock or higher grade digital cameras. Using digital effects, often, make the scene look inadequate. The pow and shock, you should get, become lame and powerless. The reason the strung up woman scene works well is because it's real, authentic and substantial. John Adams, who directed, should have stuck to this style of effect.

    Apart from that, his direction is above average. The scene with Unwin walking through the barn is both shot and structured well. There's the right amount of infused tension and threat. However, it's the ending of the scene that works best as Unwin flings open the barn doors to safety... and is nearly run over by a police car with blues and twos going.

    Another great surprise is the skill of the cast. For a budget move, there are a lot of cast members with lines. Granted, some, like the above-mentioned parents of the missing boy, are wooden and hammy. However, these are few and spatter through the film. My favourite characters have to be; DI Reed, as mentioned above, who is superbly brought to annoying life by Paul Reynolds. The strong and confident Jane Dale is portrayed, just as powerfully, by Tanya Franks. And I have always liked John Rhys-Davies, he is one of the main reasons I watched the film. He comes across as he always does, and he never lets his accent slip.

    This is one of those love it or hate it movies. I can understand why many people would be put off. However, I believe you should give it a try. It's strangely enjoyable for all its faults. Because there are more positives. Just leave your brain at the door, and enjoy.

    Cast your gaze across to my Absolute Horror list to see where this weirdly pleasing film ranked. Who knows, you may find your next fave, or at the very least, your next feature to watch.

    Take Care and Stay Well.
    3paul_m_haakonsen

    Nothing memorable here...

    When I sat down to watch "Aux" (aka "Soldier of War"), I had expected more of a zombiesque movie. However, that was not the case, and I was in for a less than mediocre foray into the horror genre.

    The storyline in "Aux" was just so stupid that it was hard to buy into it, especially since 70 years of decomposition would have left the British undead soldier in a far, far worse state than he was. And it was just a ludicrous plot actually.

    Not even John Rhys-Davies could manage to lift this movie up from the mediocre gutter. And he wasn't really all that big a part of the movie actually, which was a shame, because he could have brought so much more enjoyment to the movie.

    This entire movie just felt like an ambitious low budget project. I am sure that the heart and spirit was in the right place of writers John Adams and Peter Adams, but translated to the screen, the storyline and plot just didn't really take off.

    I managed to sit through this entire movie, hoping that it would pick up and become more interesting. It just never happened. So with it watched, I am sure that it will be obliterated from memory within a short time, because it left absolutely no memorable impression.

    This is not the type of movie that you'' watch more than once, provided that you even watch it the first time.

    Mehr wie diese

    13 Eerie - We Prey for You
    4,5
    13 Eerie - We Prey for You
    Fortune's Smile
    Fortune's Smile
    Le Accelerator
    9,1
    Le Accelerator
    Detroit Rising
    Detroit Rising
    The Pleasure in Pain
    7,9
    The Pleasure in Pain
    The Visitor
    4,1
    The Visitor
    Geron
    6,3
    Geron
    SOLO
    5,4
    SOLO
    Kingslayer
    4,1
    Kingslayer
    The Mutilator
    5,2
    The Mutilator
    Saint-Narcisse
    5,4
    Saint-Narcisse
    The Bunker - Der Feind ist nicht dort draussen.
    5,4
    The Bunker - Der Feind ist nicht dort draussen.

    Handlung

    Ändern

    Top-Auswahl

    Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
    Anmelden

    FAQ

    • How long is Aux?
      Powered by Alexa

    Details

    Ändern
    • Erscheinungsdatum
      • 2. März 2018 (Vereinigtes Königreich)
    • Herkunftsland
      • Vereinigtes Königreich
    • Auch bekannt als
      • Soldier of War
    • Produktionsfirma
      • Evolutionary Films
    • Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen

    Box Office

    Ändern
    • Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
      • 725 $
    Weitere Informationen zur Box Office finden Sie auf IMDbPro.

    Technische Daten

    Ändern
    • Laufzeit
      1 Stunde 23 Minuten
    • Farbe
      • Color
    • Seitenverhältnis
      • 2.39:1

    Zu dieser Seite beitragen

    Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen
    Aux (2018)
    Oberste Lücke
    By what name was Aux (2018) officially released in India in English?
    Antwort
    • Weitere Lücken anzeigen
    • Erfahre mehr über das Beitragen
    Seite bearbeiten

    Mehr entdecken

    Zuletzt angesehen

    Bitte aktiviere Browser-Cookies, um diese Funktion nutzen zu können. Weitere Informationen
    Hol dir die IMDb-App
    Melde dich an für Zugriff auf mehr InhalteMelde dich an für Zugriff auf mehr Inhalte
    Folge IMDb in den sozialen Netzwerken
    Hol dir die IMDb-App
    Für Android und iOS
    Hol dir die IMDb-App
    • Hilfe
    • Inhaltsverzeichnis
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • IMDb-Daten lizenzieren
    • Pressezimmer
    • Werbung
    • Jobs
    • Allgemeine Geschäftsbedingungen
    • Datenschutzrichtlinie
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, ein Amazon-Unternehmen

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.