IMDb-BEWERTUNG
4,3/10
1877
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Nach einer globalen Pandemie müssen die Schauspielerin Ava Boone und ihr Freund Kelly Rhodes aus dem Chaos in Los Angeles fliehen.Nach einer globalen Pandemie müssen die Schauspielerin Ava Boone und ihr Freund Kelly Rhodes aus dem Chaos in Los Angeles fliehen.Nach einer globalen Pandemie müssen die Schauspielerin Ava Boone und ihr Freund Kelly Rhodes aus dem Chaos in Los Angeles fliehen.
Andrew Marksman
- Dead Man in Car
- (Nicht genannt)
Martin Mica
- Handsome Man
- (Nicht genannt)
Jack Schuler
- Soldier
- (Nicht genannt)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
I was in the mood for a trashy post-apocalyptic story. Came across this, saw the low ratings and thought here is my guy. What I got instead was a tight and interesting character drama. Pleasantly surprising. It has many faults, sure. Directing and cinematography is good, acting ok, but the editor should maybe find another career. But again, watch it with an open mind and you won't be sorry. Quite enjoyable.
That I have to fast-forward through. This happens very rarely and I watch lots of films. During the quarantine, I've watched like 20 films and I just want to say I'm sorry since I just couldn't force myself to sit through this one.
It is in fact - boring and unengaging. After literally nothing interesting (besides setting up the premise) happened in the first 40 minutes I was just forced to fast forward through this one and believe me, I've seen a lot of slow films that work. Scenes are there for a reason, these have to establish something, characters, their relations, build up the atmosphere, you should avoid filler scenes in a film.
I don't want to go hard on the creators, but did no one really took a look at this film and say - this just can't work, it's too slow and we clearly have not enough material for a full feature?
The main lead is likable (although distractingly beautiful in a classic sense of the word), her character has an arc, the message in there, literally burning the bridges and killing the past, evolving.
Why not give the script some time and thought? Fill it with something interesting?
It is in fact - boring and unengaging. After literally nothing interesting (besides setting up the premise) happened in the first 40 minutes I was just forced to fast forward through this one and believe me, I've seen a lot of slow films that work. Scenes are there for a reason, these have to establish something, characters, their relations, build up the atmosphere, you should avoid filler scenes in a film.
I don't want to go hard on the creators, but did no one really took a look at this film and say - this just can't work, it's too slow and we clearly have not enough material for a full feature?
The main lead is likable (although distractingly beautiful in a classic sense of the word), her character has an arc, the message in there, literally burning the bridges and killing the past, evolving.
Why not give the script some time and thought? Fill it with something interesting?
I was surprised to see this movie's low rating. I expected this movie to be rubbish honestly, and if you're expecting an action disaster movie you won't get it here. It is simply set up and realistic in my opinion. It has some flaws but I found it believable and refreshing. The main character had more depth than I expected given the set up of a pretty actress. Not a ground breaking story, but cinematography was beautiful. Well done cast and crew. You deserve better than 4 stars.
What are these people thinking? Anyone who rated this movie 1/10 has never seen a REALLY TERRIBLE movie AND anyone who rated this movie 10/10 has never seen a REALLY GREAT movie. This movie was a typical low budget movie (simple plot, simple characters, predictable in every aspect). At 1 1/2 hours long it was OK. It's all in the expectations. Don't expect much and you won't be disappointed.
This movie was released just as the pandemic was starting back in March and yesterday was released on VOD.
Also yesterday the rating was around 5,now it's at 3.9 and dropping so that is an indication of the quality of this film.
This is not a suggestion to watch but rather to avoid. Not exactly Post Apocalyptic,more end of the world scenario,with poor acting, bad or nonexistent story. What's worse is that we now know what it's like when a global pandemic hits and how people,governments, WHO etc react. We have that experience now and as life is always stranger than fiction this zero effort scenario is not convincing.
Also yesterday the rating was around 5,now it's at 3.9 and dropping so that is an indication of the quality of this film.
This is not a suggestion to watch but rather to avoid. Not exactly Post Apocalyptic,more end of the world scenario,with poor acting, bad or nonexistent story. What's worse is that we now know what it's like when a global pandemic hits and how people,governments, WHO etc react. We have that experience now and as life is always stranger than fiction this zero effort scenario is not convincing.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesAlle Einträge enthalten Spoiler
- PatzerKelly is beside the pickup truck when Ava's father approaches, then one sees little of him for an extended time during which Ava disarms and kills two members of the household, then escapes and is shot at by a third member. Kelly then appears in the house but it's unclear where he was all that time.
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is Before the Fire?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsland
- Offizieller Standort
- Auch bekannt als
- Before the Fire
- Drehorte
- Produktionsfirma
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
- Laufzeit
- 1 Std. 30 Min.(90 min)
- Farbe
- Seitenverhältnis
- 2.35 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen