IMDb-BEWERTUNG
5,0/10
10.307
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Gefahr, Täuschung und Mord tauchen in einer verschlafenen Stadt auf, als ein professioneller Killer einen neuen Auftrag von seinem rätselhaften Chef annimmt.Gefahr, Täuschung und Mord tauchen in einer verschlafenen Stadt auf, als ein professioneller Killer einen neuen Auftrag von seinem rätselhaften Chef annimmt.Gefahr, Täuschung und Mord tauchen in einer verschlafenen Stadt auf, als ein professioneller Killer einen neuen Auftrag von seinem rätselhaften Chef annimmt.
- Regie
- Drehbuch
- Hauptbesetzung
Basil Kershner
- Pedestrian
- (Nicht genannt)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
A thriller, a kind of investigation carried out by a hit man through his point of view.
Entertaining and well interpreted and staged.
Entertaining and well interpreted and staged.
I'm curious how anyone involved with the making of this film saw the final cut and said "awesome, let's get it out there!"
I get that writers James Wolf and Nick Stagliano (also the director) are newb filmmakers, but this is just a waste of everyone's (the viewers and those involved with the film) time. A 5th grader could've written a better screenplay. It had plot and technical issues galore. There were scenes that where irrelevant and/or made no sense. It was predictable. It was implausible. It was ridiculous. And you can't just use the word "noir" as an excuse to describe this mess. The 110 runtime was excessive for the little substance the story had, and the slow pacing got to the point of making this film annoying to watch.
The cinematography and performances were the only somewhat redeeming qualities. Sad to say this film doesn't do Hopkins any favors on his resume. It's a very generous 3/10 from me.
I get that writers James Wolf and Nick Stagliano (also the director) are newb filmmakers, but this is just a waste of everyone's (the viewers and those involved with the film) time. A 5th grader could've written a better screenplay. It had plot and technical issues galore. There were scenes that where irrelevant and/or made no sense. It was predictable. It was implausible. It was ridiculous. And you can't just use the word "noir" as an excuse to describe this mess. The 110 runtime was excessive for the little substance the story had, and the slow pacing got to the point of making this film annoying to watch.
The cinematography and performances were the only somewhat redeeming qualities. Sad to say this film doesn't do Hopkins any favors on his resume. It's a very generous 3/10 from me.
Ok, at first I got hooked by the trailer, which set me to expect something good out of this movie, and by Anthony Hopkins, who's (usually) a safe bet. And it was a mistake, I admit!
All characters are pretty flat and shallow, dialogue is superficial and performance is disengaging (specially Abbie Cornish!), and sequence of event's does not make any sense
Put all of that aside. Finishing the movie in retrospect I asked myself: WTF just happened??? The only answer my super ego dictated was that I wasted another 1:30 hrs of my life due to not responding to my gut feeling that it's a trap!
I really wanted to like this movie, but I couldn't. 5 stars for cinematography and Hopkins performance, zero for everything else except Abbie Cornish's performance that is -2!
If you find this review unhelpful (which is a sorta true) then imagine your disappointment when you watch this movie! Sorry.
All characters are pretty flat and shallow, dialogue is superficial and performance is disengaging (specially Abbie Cornish!), and sequence of event's does not make any sense
Put all of that aside. Finishing the movie in retrospect I asked myself: WTF just happened??? The only answer my super ego dictated was that I wasted another 1:30 hrs of my life due to not responding to my gut feeling that it's a trap!
I really wanted to like this movie, but I couldn't. 5 stars for cinematography and Hopkins performance, zero for everything else except Abbie Cornish's performance that is -2!
If you find this review unhelpful (which is a sorta true) then imagine your disappointment when you watch this movie! Sorry.
It's an unusual film with a slightly uneven plot, but it kept my interest until the end altho' the reason why it ends like it does are unclear but I'm guessing there's no honour amongst thieves (or hitmen). Decent performances from all concerned and if you fancy a slow burner with a few twists you could do worse than watch this. 7.5/10.
The hitman is told where and when to find his victim, but not who. No name, no picture or description, just an obscure clue. When he arrives at his destination, there are multiple possibilities for him to consider. If you can get past that premise, it is still a mediocre and predictable bore.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesThe coded note The Virtuoso receives at the start of the film reads:
"Once there was a worn and withered old man too set in his ways, bound by routine to have the fore-sight to understand that in all his seventy-six years he's always done the same thing, ate the same food, chose the same colors, won the same battles. His life a breathing pentagon: home, work, rest, eat, dream. From age eighteen he'd never questioned his lot. Until, the trinity... and the agony of realization that a life lived can never be re-lived."
- PatzerThe virtuoso is so careful, yet when he poisons the man in the motel he takes off his gloves when handling the glass. Which would leave obvious fingerprints.
Mistaken observation. He touched the glass once, swirling it to dissolve the powders he added. He put his glove on that hand before touching it.
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is The Virtuoso?Powered by Alexa
Details
Box Office
- Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
- 21.356 $
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 50 Minuten
- Farbe
- Seitenverhältnis
- 2.35 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen