[go: up one dir, main page]

    Kalender veröffentlichenDie Top 250 FilmeDie beliebtesten FilmeFilme nach Genre durchsuchenBeste KinokasseSpielzeiten und TicketsNachrichten aus dem FilmFilm im Rampenlicht Indiens
    Was läuft im Fernsehen und was kann ich streamen?Die Top 250 TV-SerienBeliebteste TV-SerienSerien nach Genre durchsuchenNachrichten im Fernsehen
    Was gibt es zu sehenAktuelle TrailerIMDb OriginalsIMDb-AuswahlIMDb SpotlightLeitfaden für FamilienunterhaltungIMDb-Podcasts
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAlle Ereignisse
    Heute geborenDie beliebtesten PromisPromi-News
    HilfecenterBereich für BeitragendeUmfragen
Für Branchenprofis
  • Sprache
  • Vollständig unterstützt
  • English (United States)
    Teilweise unterstützt
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Anmelden
  • Vollständig unterstützt
  • English (United States)
    Teilweise unterstützt
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
App verwenden
  • Besetzung und Crew-Mitglieder
  • Benutzerrezensionen
  • Wissenswertes
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

Mistrust

  • 2018
  • TV-14
  • 1 Std. 30 Min.
IMDb-BEWERTUNG
5,7/10
1079
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Jane Seymour and Parker Stevenson in Mistrust (2018)
DramaRomanze

Veronica hat keine Verpflichtungen und ist nie verletzlich. Sie genießt es, eine Geliebte zu sein. Sie erkennt, dass ihre beste Freundin den Schlüssel zu ihrem Herzen hält und ist die Einzig... Alles lesenVeronica hat keine Verpflichtungen und ist nie verletzlich. Sie genießt es, eine Geliebte zu sein. Sie erkennt, dass ihre beste Freundin den Schlüssel zu ihrem Herzen hält und ist die Einzige, die in der Lage ist, ihre Emotionen zu extrahieren.Veronica hat keine Verpflichtungen und ist nie verletzlich. Sie genießt es, eine Geliebte zu sein. Sie erkennt, dass ihre beste Freundin den Schlüssel zu ihrem Herzen hält und ist die Einzige, die in der Lage ist, ihre Emotionen zu extrahieren.

  • Regie
    • Shane Stanley
  • Drehbuch
    • Tiffany Johnson
    • Shane Stanley
  • Hauptbesetzung
    • Jane Seymour
    • Nia Peeples
    • Parker Stevenson
  • Siehe Produktionsinformationen bei IMDbPro
  • IMDb-BEWERTUNG
    5,7/10
    1079
    IHRE BEWERTUNG
    • Regie
      • Shane Stanley
    • Drehbuch
      • Tiffany Johnson
      • Shane Stanley
    • Hauptbesetzung
      • Jane Seymour
      • Nia Peeples
      • Parker Stevenson
    • 12Benutzerrezensionen
  • Siehe Produktionsinformationen bei IMDbPro
  • Siehe Produktionsinformationen bei IMDbPro
  • Fotos3

    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen

    Topbesetzung39

    Ändern
    Jane Seymour
    Jane Seymour
    • Veronica Malloy
    Nia Peeples
    Nia Peeples
    • Kristen Rhodes
    Parker Stevenson
    Parker Stevenson
    • Brandon McKellan
    Ellen Travolta
    Ellen Travolta
    • Margie
    Ian Ogilvy
    Ian Ogilvy
    • Ian
    William Shockley
    William Shockley
    • Adam Ross
    Patrick Bristow
    Patrick Bristow
    • Trent Masterson
    Joel Brooks
    Joel Brooks
    • Steve Masterson
    Jack Bannon
    Jack Bannon
    • Nathan Dobier
    Katherine Flynn
    Katherine Flynn
    • Young Veronica
    Dan Shaked
    Dan Shaked
    • Jason
    Parker Croft
    Parker Croft
    • Ian
    Bryce Draper
    Bryce Draper
    • Young Brandon
    Val Barri
    Val Barri
    • Flower Delivery Girl
    Sienna Noelle Peeples
    • Theater usher
    • (as Sienna-Noelle)
    Jorja Bleu Michaels
    • Girl at birthday party
    Kiriakos Stavros
    • Bar Patron
    • (as Kiri Stevens)
    Karolin Luna
    • Hostess
    • Regie
      • Shane Stanley
    • Drehbuch
      • Tiffany Johnson
      • Shane Stanley
    • Komplette Besetzung und alle Crew-Mitglieder
    • Produktion, Einspielergebnisse & mehr bei IMDbPro

    Benutzerrezensionen12

    5,71K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Empfohlene Bewertungen

    4juneebuggy

    Jane Seymour looked like she was going to eat Parker Stevenson

    Jane Seymour was the reason I initially watched and then stuck through this. She plays a woman who relishes her life as a mistress, only having relationships with married men, she then finds her feelings tested by an old friend but can't admit it.

    Not a great movie, on a made for T.V/ Hallmarkish sort of style & budget, it was nice to see a woman Jane's age, with...gasp... wrinkles in a romance, she's still beautiful. There are some kinda gross love scenes, even disregarding the age factor that had way too much open mouthed kissing, Jane looked like she was going to eat Parker Stevenson at one point, I had too look away.
    3iantrader

    It didn't hang together for me. It might for you, but don't expect too much.

    Gosh! Who on earth scores this so highly??

    It's an interesting concept - a serial mistress wanting no commitments - but it's cliched, a bit predictable and the plot develops through 'logical argument' rather than character drives.

    Ok, one at a time...

    Cliched - ok, we'll give it the Rom cliche - girl meets boy, girl loses boy - girl may or may not get boy back (so as to avoid any spoilers) - but she works in a bookshop - or ows it or part owns it, it's not clear - and one of her best friends also works there (or owns it) and is gay. Ring any bells? All the meetings she has are in swanky restaurants or hotels. That defines a type of Chic Lit fiction which perhaps this is.

    A bit predictable. After the initial intro you know where it's heading. As is often the case with RomComs (altho this is a RomDrama) but there were plenty of opportunities to step off the path a bit.

    Plot development. Ok, this is the worst thing and it appears in many, many American series. It's where the author wants a relationship to change and they do it by constructing a 'logical' (or sometimes not so logical) argument between the characters. Probably not the first example, but I became increasingly aware of the technique in The Arrow series and then it seemed to pop up everywhere. There's a lot of talking in the movie, and a lot of these arguments.

    Other than that... :-)

    Well, I love Jane Seymour but she's no spring chicken. In fact she's 66 and she's playing a 40-something. I hope to god she's not supposed to be a 30-something. Hey, maybe she's a 50-something. That would make more sense but I feel the character is def in her 40s. Having said that she looks terrific and very foxy!

    Parker Stevenson is a year younger but he looks his age so we have a 40-something with a 60-something. Nothing wrong with that particularly but he's also dating a definitie 30-ish woman. Like it or not, such age differences do matter and do need to be discussed in a relationship but it's not mentioned here when so many other things are.

    Anyway, the movie didn't quite hang together for me. Nor for most of the reviewers, so who's giving it these high score?

    It might work for you, but don't expect too much.
    3franklindf

    Just not worth the time

    The movie is reasonably well made but it falls well short of being a good movie. It's basically a relationship drama about an aging woman who practices polyamory meaning she pursues multiple sexual relationships concurrently and ensuring each relationship stays superficial enough to avoid strings being attached. It sounds interesting enough in theory but the reality disappoints because, mainly the characters are not compelling enough to make the viewer really care. Date one man or date 10, sorry I just can't be bothered to concern myself. It might be different if the female lead was someone I might like to date. But she's just an older lady without much really going for her. She's not unattractive per se, but I just don't see any sizzle and I think most men would agree. I can't say much for the other characters either. If you just wanted something on to waste some time, this could work. But if you're expecting more, just pass on this.
    1haggismcbird

    Quite possibly the worst film I've watched in a long while

    This is just awful, it's so beneath you Jane Seymour. I've always loved your work but this was just dire. I think for me it just dragged on. The plot was just appalling, It wasn't about female empowerment as much as a woman who quite clearly didn't mind being used. There's nothing empowering in that. The ending is just bizarre, a relationship built on lies. Good luck with that one deary. Plus point, good on you for not hiding your age you are still a lovely looking woman and in a business where youth and looks seem to be important that's impressive. As far as I'm concerned it's an hour and a half I won't get back. Also how has it got such a positive rating on here. No accounting for tase I suppose.
    2fam-32854

    No substance; no interest

    A sad story about friends in love, but who can't admit it. The story had huge holes and lacked the details to flush out interest in this story. The acting wasn't too bad, but the script was so weak, I couldn't force myself to stay engaged.

    Mehr wie diese

    Hostile Territory
    4,9
    Hostile Territory
    Pray for Rain
    5,3
    Pray for Rain
    Ruby's Choice
    6,4
    Ruby's Choice
    American Confederate
    2,4
    American Confederate
    Probe
    7,9
    Probe
    Nothing Left to Fear - Das Tor zur Hölle
    4,4
    Nothing Left to Fear - Das Tor zur Hölle
    6 Hours Away
    4,0
    6 Hours Away
    Es ist nur eine Phase, Hase
    5,8
    Es ist nur eine Phase, Hase
    Last Call in the Dog House
    4,2
    Last Call in the Dog House
    Break Even
    4,8
    Break Even
    Six Days in Evergreen
    Six Days in Evergreen
    And You Are?
    And You Are?

    Handlung

    Ändern

    Wusstest du schon

    Ändern
    • Wissenswertes
      The store owned by Jane Seymour's character was open in Thousand Oaks, Calif. for over 20 years. It was scheduled to close permanently before production began but the owners agreed to keep it open as a way to immortalize the store and have it to remember on film. With that in mind, the store was virtually untouched for filming and the scripted name of the store, "A Novel Idea" was replaced by the store's real name, "The Bookaneer." During filming, the occasional customer came in between takes to buy books and browse the shelves.
    • Zitate

      Brandon McKellan: You didn't cause my divorce, my marriage did.

    Top-Auswahl

    Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
    Anmelden

    FAQ

    • How long is Mistrust?Powered by Alexa

    Details

    Ändern
    • Erscheinungsdatum
      • 1. Juni 2018 (Vereinigte Staaten)
    • Herkunftsland
      • Vereinigte Staaten
    • Auch bekannt als
      • Сомнения
    • Drehorte
      • Westlake Village, Kalifornien, USA
    • Produktionsfirmen
      • Visual Arts Entertainment
      • Ruby Slipper Productions
    • Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen

    Technische Daten

    Ändern
    • Laufzeit
      1 Stunde 30 Minuten
    • Farbe
      • Color

    Zu dieser Seite beitragen

    Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen
    • Erfahre mehr über das Beitragen
    Seite bearbeiten

    Mehr entdecken

    Zuletzt angesehen

    Bitte aktiviere Browser-Cookies, um diese Funktion nutzen zu können. Weitere Informationen
    Hol dir die IMDb-App
    Melde dich an für Zugriff auf mehr InhalteMelde dich an für Zugriff auf mehr Inhalte
    Folge IMDb in den sozialen Netzwerken
    Hol dir die IMDb-App
    Für Android und iOS
    Hol dir die IMDb-App
    • Hilfe
    • Inhaltsverzeichnis
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • IMDb-Daten lizenzieren
    • Pressezimmer
    • Werbung
    • Jobs
    • Allgemeine Geschäftsbedingungen
    • Datenschutzrichtlinie
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, ein Amazon-Unternehmen

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.