[go: up one dir, main page]

    Kalender veröffentlichenDie Top 250 FilmeDie beliebtesten FilmeFilme nach Genre durchsuchenBeste KinokasseSpielzeiten und TicketsNachrichten aus dem FilmFilm im Rampenlicht Indiens
    Was läuft im Fernsehen und was kann ich streamen?Die Top 250 TV-SerienBeliebteste TV-SerienSerien nach Genre durchsuchenNachrichten im Fernsehen
    Was gibt es zu sehenAktuelle TrailerIMDb OriginalsIMDb-AuswahlIMDb SpotlightLeitfaden für FamilienunterhaltungIMDb-Podcasts
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalIMDb Stars to WatchSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAlle Ereignisse
    Heute geborenDie beliebtesten PromisPromi-News
    HilfecenterBereich für BeitragendeUmfragen
Für Branchenprofis
  • Sprache
  • Vollständig unterstützt
  • English (United States)
    Teilweise unterstützt
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Anmelden
  • Vollständig unterstützt
  • English (United States)
    Teilweise unterstützt
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
App verwenden
  • Besetzung und Crew-Mitglieder
  • Benutzerrezensionen
  • Wissenswertes
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

Realive

  • 2016
  • Not Rated
  • 1 Std. 52 Min.
IMDb-BEWERTUNG
5,9/10
5678
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Tom Hughes in Realive (2016)
Marc (Tom Hughes) is diagnosed with a disease and is given one year left to live. Unable to accept his own end, he decides to freeze his body. Sixty years later, in the year 2084, he becomes the first man to be revived in history. It is then he discovers that the love of his life, Naomi (Oona Chaplin), has accompanied him this entire time in a way that he'd never expected.
trailer wiedergeben2:08
4 Videos
19 Fotos
DramaScience-Fiction

Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuMarc will die of cancer and chooses cryogenic freeze and hopes to be thawed, when there's a solution to his condition. He's the first human brought back 68 years later. Can he adapt mentally... Alles lesenMarc will die of cancer and chooses cryogenic freeze and hopes to be thawed, when there's a solution to his condition. He's the first human brought back 68 years later. Can he adapt mentally and physically?Marc will die of cancer and chooses cryogenic freeze and hopes to be thawed, when there's a solution to his condition. He's the first human brought back 68 years later. Can he adapt mentally and physically?

  • Regie
    • Mateo Gil
  • Drehbuch
    • Mateo Gil
  • Hauptbesetzung
    • Oona Chaplin
    • Charlotte Le Bon
    • Tom Hughes
  • Siehe Produktionsinformationen bei IMDbPro
  • IMDb-BEWERTUNG
    5,9/10
    5678
    IHRE BEWERTUNG
    • Regie
      • Mateo Gil
    • Drehbuch
      • Mateo Gil
    • Hauptbesetzung
      • Oona Chaplin
      • Charlotte Le Bon
      • Tom Hughes
    • 50Benutzerrezensionen
    • 49Kritische Rezensionen
    • 59Metascore
  • Siehe Produktionsinformationen bei IMDbPro
    • Auszeichnungen
      • 3 Gewinne & 2 Nominierungen insgesamt

    Videos4

    Official Trailer
    Trailer 2:08
    Official Trailer
    REALIVE Official Trailer
    Trailer 2:08
    REALIVE Official Trailer
    REALIVE Official Trailer
    Trailer 2:08
    REALIVE Official Trailer
    Official Trailer
    Trailer 1:59
    Official Trailer
    Teaser Trailer #1
    Trailer 0:41
    Teaser Trailer #1

    Fotos18

    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    + 12
    Poster ansehen

    Topbesetzung39

    Ändern
    Oona Chaplin
    Oona Chaplin
    • Naomi
    Charlotte Le Bon
    Charlotte Le Bon
    • Elizabeth
    Tom Hughes
    Tom Hughes
    • Marc Jarvis
    Barry Ward
    Barry Ward
    • West
    Rafael Cebrián
    Rafael Cebrián
    • Jeffrey
    Melina Matthews
    Melina Matthews
    • Technician
    Alex Hafner
    Alex Hafner
    • The Elderly Hornball
    Nikol Kollars
    Nikol Kollars
    • Dr. Gethers
    Daniel Horvath
    Daniel Horvath
    • Surgeon
    Godeliv Van den Brandt
    • Sigourney
    Alexandra Szucs
    Alexandra Szucs
    • Sandy
    Julio Perillán
    Julio Perillán
    • Dr. Serra
    Frida Palsson
    Frida Palsson
    • Surgeon 2
    Mark Schardan
    Mark Schardan
    • Oncologist
    Tony Corvillo
    Tony Corvillo
    • Surgeon 3
    Angelo Olivier
    Angelo Olivier
    • Marc's Father
    Saras Gil
    • Andrea
    Oscar Dorta
    Oscar Dorta
    • Reanimated
    • Regie
      • Mateo Gil
    • Drehbuch
      • Mateo Gil
    • Komplette Besetzung und alle Crew-Mitglieder
    • Produktion, Einspielergebnisse & mehr bei IMDbPro

    Benutzerrezensionen50

    5,95.6K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Empfohlene Bewertungen

    3vrajabhumi

    Do not expect a good sci-fi, expect a pedantic drag.

    I didn't read any reviews or see a trailer before watching so I had no preconceptions. Afterwards after reading the other 4 reviews I wondered what the really good reviews saw in this film. My guess is that maybe they expected a film that was less competently made, or maybe they expected a less serious film - and were surprised at how well made and serious this was. My guess also is that the obvious flaws of the film were overlooked or not noticed by them because of how well put together it is, just a guess. The problems with this film outweigh the good production and good story. Those problems are: the slow pacing; repetitiveness; morose lead actor; lack of anything stimulating and generally a drag. To give an analogy I would compare this to a college lecture by a really smart teacher who is really good at explaining the lessons but is dry and pedantic and puts students to sleep vs. an entertaining teacher who keeps students on the edge of their seats. While I am not asking this movie to be Transformers, still the script needed much more work before this was made. The story is interesting and with I imagine a limited budget they were able to pull off an impressive production, but with a boring script it ends up being a waste of time since it is so repetitive and really does not go far enough story wise. This would have worked well as the first 40 minutes of a different story, as it stands it will leave most people cold and few will stay to the end, and if they do most of them will regret it since nothing exciting or entertaining ever happens. It moves slowly and dull till the end.
    6ulicknormanowen

    Seconds

    Ambitious, not often successful story of a young man who made his way of life triumphantly,and who ,terminally-ill ,chooses cryogenic freeze , to be able to "realive" in the future when the science,in the shape of Dr West (a nod to the excellent "re-animator " feat. Jeffrey Combs ), is able to give him a second chance in another era .

    Although there's numerous hints at religion (the Lazarus project :"lazarus ,come forth !"), the fact that immortality may make gain another world but lose your soul ;in fact ,you want to find back what you've lost , but time moves like a jet plane and it's a brand new world you have to face .

    Thanks to a brand new technology ,you can record your memories (why not? A hundred years ago ,who would have thought of the computering revolution? ),but those memories are a jumble,for they come from every moment of your life ( cruelty to animals -the lizard and the hen-is gratuitous and pointless);besides , Naomi ,to do what she does ,must have experimented l'amour fou and nothing really shows it (unless a would be torrid sex scene counts);besides, Marc's impossibility to adapt himself to another way of life (the new sex lib is not that much new ,it recalls the hippies) is not fully exploited :it was already brillantly treated in Frankenheimer's sensational film ,"seconds"(1966)

    This film is interesting but it is mainly a missed golden opportunity.
    8Crankgorilla

    Something in recent sci-fi that's not completely ridiculous

    Something of a mood piece leaning toward gattica over trek in styling and pace, it's a good one to watch when you've seen almost everything and have a cold or for whatever reason get stuck indoors. It's more mature sci-fi instead of talking rodents and giant smurfs.

    Considering a movie has such a short time to convey complicated ideas, this film is put together well and shoots and hits at more of those targets than one would expect.

    Presentation is good on all fronts. The lead role could have been written for anyone really, male or female and they had to choose one particular lifestyle to represent the story and the one they chose was OK, but some wont like it.

    This is a movie that could have gone longer in many directions. The actual science of it all was done well and can serve as an example of a direction that could have gone longer. That's what a good movie does. Makes you want more.

    A once watch flick that makes an impact. I'll buy it for the box art and put it on my recommend list.
    4arefin-67466

    A Simple waste of time!

    It's more of a sad love story than a sci-fi!! Lack of drama, poorly written characters!!
    7kosmasp

    Who wants to freeze forever?

    This science fiction tale (with a moral standpoint and quite a few serious questions about mortality) is done really well. It may not qualify for a classic, but it's still encapsulates a lot of things that we've come to love from these types of movies. That's literally to a point, where you may recognize where some of the inspiration has been drawn from. But it has enough to say on its own too.

    It may seem cliché at points in the story and you may feel like you've seen similar things before, but it's tough to be completely original. It's hard enough to be good in what you're trying to say. And this makes a lot of points about living and dying. And being able to accept things. Some things do not translate as good though and it's tough for the main actor to convey certain feelings that none of us have gone through (to that extend). Still more than solid and very gripping

    Verwandte Interessen

    Mahershala Ali and Alex R. Hibbert in Moonlight (2016)
    Drama
    James Earl Jones and David Prowse in Star Wars: Episode V - Das Imperium schlägt zurück (1980)
    Science-Fiction

    Handlung

    Ändern

    Wusstest du schon

    Ändern
    • Wissenswertes
      The protagonist reminisces about a movie he'd seen, in which Lazarus resents being brought back to life by Jesus. For this flashback, the movie uses a clip from the 1988 film "The Last Temptation of Christ," starring Willem Dafoe. Later, during the fundraising scene at the garden party, Dafoe can be spotted in a cameo as one of the applauding patrons.
    • Zitate

      Marc Jarvis: I don't know.

      Marc Jarvis: There is only one thing I can see clearly now.

      Marc Jarvis: Life is nothing more than state of matter.

      Marc Jarvis: Like a gas. Or liquid.

      Marc Jarvis: A form of molecular organisation.

      Marc Jarvis: And there's nothing transcendent or devine about it.

      Marc Jarvis: It's only objective is to perpetuate itself through motion, change, adaptation.

      Marc Jarvis: Life isn't worried about any species. Much or less, any individual.

      Marc Jarvis: We are nothing more than the chunks of mud that uses it as a vehicle.

      Marc Jarvis: Life is what's scary. Not death.

      Marc Jarvis: But it's always on the verge of extinction.

      Marc Jarvis: But it exists wherever it shouldn't.

      Marc Jarvis: And the soul, you may ask, what about the soul?

      Marc Jarvis: Well, maybe the soul is the bit that gets lost when you freeze the meat and then thought out again.

    • Soundtracks
      Deep Blue
      Lyrics & Music by Mark Peters, Elliot Ireland and Alessandro Rizzo

    Top-Auswahl

    Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
    Anmelden

    FAQ19

    • How long is Realive?Powered by Alexa

    Details

    Ändern
    • Erscheinungsdatum
      • 13. Januar 2017 (Spanien)
    • Herkunftsländer
      • Belgien
      • Spanien
      • Frankreich
    • Sprache
      • Englisch
    • Auch bekannt als
      • Tái Sinh
    • Drehorte
      • Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spanien(location)
    • Produktionsfirmen
      • Arcadia Motion Pictures
      • Achaman Films AIE
      • Canal+ España
    • Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen

    Box Office

    Ändern
    • Budget
      • 7.000.000 $ (geschätzt)
    • Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
      • 125.680 $
    Weitere Informationen zur Box Office finden Sie auf IMDbPro.

    Technische Daten

    Ändern
    • Laufzeit
      • 1 Std. 52 Min.(112 min)
    • Farbe
      • Color
    • Seitenverhältnis
      • 2.39:1

    Zu dieser Seite beitragen

    Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen
    • Erfahre mehr über das Beitragen
    Seite bearbeiten

    Mehr entdecken

    Zuletzt angesehen

    Bitte aktiviere Browser-Cookies, um diese Funktion nutzen zu können. Weitere Informationen
    Hol dir die IMDb-App
    Melde dich an für Zugriff auf mehr InhalteMelde dich an für Zugriff auf mehr Inhalte
    Folge IMDb in den sozialen Netzwerken
    Hol dir die IMDb-App
    Für Android und iOS
    Hol dir die IMDb-App
    • Hilfe
    • Inhaltsverzeichnis
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • IMDb-Daten lizenzieren
    • Pressezimmer
    • Werbung
    • Jobs
    • Allgemeine Geschäftsbedingungen
    • Datenschutzrichtlinie
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, ein Amazon-Unternehmen

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.