IMDb-BEWERTUNG
3,8/10
13.453
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Eine fiktive Darstellung einer Zukunft, in der eine globalistische Terrororganisation, die sich mit den Vereinten Nationen verbündet hat, das Stromnetz der Vereinigten Staaten lahm legt und ... Alles lesenEine fiktive Darstellung einer Zukunft, in der eine globalistische Terrororganisation, die sich mit den Vereinten Nationen verbündet hat, das Stromnetz der Vereinigten Staaten lahm legt und das Kriegsrecht verhängt.Eine fiktive Darstellung einer Zukunft, in der eine globalistische Terrororganisation, die sich mit den Vereinten Nationen verbündet hat, das Stromnetz der Vereinigten Staaten lahm legt und das Kriegsrecht verhängt.
Mike Lobo Daniel
- Tiny
- (as Mike Daniel)
Jordan DragonKing
- Angry Guy
- (as Jordan Dragonking)
Chuck Huber
- Kashoid
- (as Chuck Hüber)
Scott Edward Logan
- Unseen Man
- (as Scott Logan)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
I have to be honest, I haven't seen this one but then again I don't need to. I'm willing to bet the film makers probably haven't been to film school and the intended audience wouldn't know reality if came by waving the rebel flag. This type of film, from the few reviews, does not have to be watched to be judged. I, magically (for those confused patriots out there), can divine that it is banal sponsored-by-conservative-dolts-with-money tripe. Like the Jesus walking with dinosaurs flicks. I don't have to be hit in the head with this message (like the target audience) to understand how poor it is. This has been a lesson in the process of reasoning based on available evidence. Save your ticket money for a bullet-proof vest.
"Well, they did try but...." was the first thing that came to mind having watched AmeriGeddon.
Its not that this politicized film doesn't have some valid points. Its concerns over globalized corporate government and the growth of an oppressive surveillance state, are not without validity. Nor is its criticism of GMO food, something that can simply be written off. The problem is, the whole affair is so over the top and confused, that the real message gets lost in translation.
From an entertainment point of view, this rather short flick, is best described as a cross between Red Dawn and the A-Team. Its clearly a budget affair.That said, the acting is not too bad even if the script is more than a little corny.
In summary even though this flick falls short of the mark, its still good to see people refusing to blindly accept the mainstream dialogue. Lets hope for more polished, focused efforts in future. Five out of ten from me.
Its not that this politicized film doesn't have some valid points. Its concerns over globalized corporate government and the growth of an oppressive surveillance state, are not without validity. Nor is its criticism of GMO food, something that can simply be written off. The problem is, the whole affair is so over the top and confused, that the real message gets lost in translation.
From an entertainment point of view, this rather short flick, is best described as a cross between Red Dawn and the A-Team. Its clearly a budget affair.That said, the acting is not too bad even if the script is more than a little corny.
In summary even though this flick falls short of the mark, its still good to see people refusing to blindly accept the mainstream dialogue. Lets hope for more polished, focused efforts in future. Five out of ten from me.
I will contend the acting was not great. I read some reviews saying how impossible the content was.
Of course those reviews were by people who actually believe the government has the citizen's best interest in mind.
The truth is, an EMP is possible. Our national grid has weaknesses just as our internet does. Russian hackers already tapped in to fuel delivery and food distribution facilities.
Before you scoff at the premise of this movie, do some research. This is entirely possible.
Of course those reviews were by people who actually believe the government has the citizen's best interest in mind.
The truth is, an EMP is possible. Our national grid has weaknesses just as our internet does. Russian hackers already tapped in to fuel delivery and food distribution facilities.
Before you scoff at the premise of this movie, do some research. This is entirely possible.
So it's true the acting wasn't great and there was only mediocre execution of the plot. In this particular case I'm not going to judge it by the normal standards I would a regular, full featured, big budget movie with big name actors etc. This was a low budget movie with most of the characters probably acting only a little better than you or I could. The point is the movie had to be made, the warning had to be sent out so to speak. It was to done to make you, no, force you to think. If you can't comprehend the message or simply don't believe it, well too bad for you. The government is not what it used to be or the way it was originally intended. The "for the people, of the people, by the people" days are long gone. And the further in time we get away from when the plot & message was considered to be "conspiracy theory", the closer we seem to be getting to the day it is turning into reality....conspiracy fact. THAT is the basis on which it should be judged.
Amerigeddon the movie has quite possibly done more damage to furthering the discussion of a runaway government and the impacts of it than anything else in its cinematic attempt. This is an example of good intentions gone sideways and at worst just another rich guy making a "B" movie to get his face on the big screen.
Using the "EMP" doomsday approach to make a movie narrative is understandable. Making an over dramatic, choppy, and under developed story line film that my friends wanted to walk out of is bull headed irresponsibility.
The movie itself started out with plausible and believable scenes in the first few minutes that quickly get over shadowed by bad music, 1980's sound effects at "key" moments, and acting that would make a high school drama teacher throw their glasses in disgust at. While it didn't have to be cutting edge graphics or sounds track quality, it does have to be fully watchable. It isn't. It is painful to sit all the way through. The end battle was worse than an old scene from the 80's A-Team TV show.
For those people that have been in the military, or follow world events from an anti-globalist perspective, this movie lets you walk out of the theater having to apologize for the horrible creation the people that went with them just saw. There is no plausible transition to a realistic conversation about politics, individual preparedness, or faith at the end of this film.
I am terribly disappointed and embarrassed by this attempt at informing or at least sparking the interest in people who don't take these kinds of things seriously.
From someone who wanted an A plus movie it is clearly an F minus effort.
Using the "EMP" doomsday approach to make a movie narrative is understandable. Making an over dramatic, choppy, and under developed story line film that my friends wanted to walk out of is bull headed irresponsibility.
The movie itself started out with plausible and believable scenes in the first few minutes that quickly get over shadowed by bad music, 1980's sound effects at "key" moments, and acting that would make a high school drama teacher throw their glasses in disgust at. While it didn't have to be cutting edge graphics or sounds track quality, it does have to be fully watchable. It isn't. It is painful to sit all the way through. The end battle was worse than an old scene from the 80's A-Team TV show.
For those people that have been in the military, or follow world events from an anti-globalist perspective, this movie lets you walk out of the theater having to apologize for the horrible creation the people that went with them just saw. There is no plausible transition to a realistic conversation about politics, individual preparedness, or faith at the end of this film.
I am terribly disappointed and embarrassed by this attempt at informing or at least sparking the interest in people who don't take these kinds of things seriously.
From someone who wanted an A plus movie it is clearly an F minus effort.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesWas directed by Mike Norris, who is Chuck Norris' son.
- VerbindungenFeatured in The Cinema Snob: AmeriGeddon (2019)
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is AmeriGeddon?Powered by Alexa
Details
Box Office
- Bruttoertrag in den USA und Kanada
- 316.554 $
- Eröffnungswochenende in den USA und in Kanada
- 125.571 $
- 15. Mai 2016
- Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
- 316.554 $
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 30 Minuten
- Farbe
- Seitenverhältnis
- 1.85 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen