Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuA man haunted by the mysterious death of his 4-year-old sister brings her back to life thirty years later as an adult woman, with dire consequences.A man haunted by the mysterious death of his 4-year-old sister brings her back to life thirty years later as an adult woman, with dire consequences.A man haunted by the mysterious death of his 4-year-old sister brings her back to life thirty years later as an adult woman, with dire consequences.
- Auszeichnungen
- 6 Gewinne & 11 Nominierungen insgesamt
Empfohlene Bewertungen
Don't bother... just a whole waste of time if you actually wanted something interesting and scary... this fails on every aspect of a decent film. Poor characters, bad acting, and worse story...left wondering 'what the heck!?'... why did I bother... turned off half way through.
In a film that's 86 minutes long, the first quarter is sluggish exposition that's almost entirely unnecessary. By the time we're one-third in, the plot finally seems to begin, though up to that point we're also subjected to an unconvincing performance from lead Nicholas Wilder, and one or two scenes that don't actually make any sense. I love Chad Bernhard's score, lending tense, uneasy, atmosphere, and I appreciate the highly subdued tone of the film. Yet putting aside these highlights, it's not exactly a strong start.
Once the plot belatedly commences, strange occurrences gradually accumulate. And still these are interspersed with dubious scenes, and annoying dialogue and supporting characters. Maybe they're just deliberately holding their cards close to their chests, but with only a couple exceptions, the cast does not impress me. Given a small supporting part, I think Dee Wallace illustrates fantastic range and poise as Elton's (Wilder) beleaguered mother Susan. More than that - denied even a single line in the screenplay, Tristan Risk nonetheless offers up the best performance of the movie in the title role, wielding fantastic nuance and physical presence.
I like the premise; it's what drew me in. Yet 'Ayla' relies absolutely on subtlety as it weaves its tale. There's nothing wrong with that whatsoever: I've watched plenty of movies that worked with a similar underhanded tack and loved them. There's something highly rewarding about a feature filled with a superficial appearance of uneventfulness, or purposeful obfuscation, that masks hidden depths. Such an approach requires a dexterous hand to successfully pull off, however, and filmmaker Elias does not demonstrate the necessary refined touch here. That superficial appearance of uneventfulness turns out, in this instance, to simply be actual uneventfulness, and the lack of clarity in the narrative does not seem to belie the discreetly intelligent storytelling we'd wish.
I wanted to like this; I had high hopes. I think there are good ideas within. But the story takes totally too long to truly take off, and even once it does, the movie keeps us engaged mostly because we're desperately searching for something to deserve that attentiveness - and there is disappointingly little here that captures the imagination. I'd like to think other folks will get more out of 'Ayla' than I did, but I began watching with high expectations, only to see them brought frustratingly low.
Recommended for only the most patient and open-minded of viewers, but even that is debatable.
Once the plot belatedly commences, strange occurrences gradually accumulate. And still these are interspersed with dubious scenes, and annoying dialogue and supporting characters. Maybe they're just deliberately holding their cards close to their chests, but with only a couple exceptions, the cast does not impress me. Given a small supporting part, I think Dee Wallace illustrates fantastic range and poise as Elton's (Wilder) beleaguered mother Susan. More than that - denied even a single line in the screenplay, Tristan Risk nonetheless offers up the best performance of the movie in the title role, wielding fantastic nuance and physical presence.
I like the premise; it's what drew me in. Yet 'Ayla' relies absolutely on subtlety as it weaves its tale. There's nothing wrong with that whatsoever: I've watched plenty of movies that worked with a similar underhanded tack and loved them. There's something highly rewarding about a feature filled with a superficial appearance of uneventfulness, or purposeful obfuscation, that masks hidden depths. Such an approach requires a dexterous hand to successfully pull off, however, and filmmaker Elias does not demonstrate the necessary refined touch here. That superficial appearance of uneventfulness turns out, in this instance, to simply be actual uneventfulness, and the lack of clarity in the narrative does not seem to belie the discreetly intelligent storytelling we'd wish.
I wanted to like this; I had high hopes. I think there are good ideas within. But the story takes totally too long to truly take off, and even once it does, the movie keeps us engaged mostly because we're desperately searching for something to deserve that attentiveness - and there is disappointingly little here that captures the imagination. I'd like to think other folks will get more out of 'Ayla' than I did, but I began watching with high expectations, only to see them brought frustratingly low.
Recommended for only the most patient and open-minded of viewers, but even that is debatable.
There are very few, if any, redeeming qualities in this movie. I think they had a good idea for a movie (something similar to a "Sometimes They Come Back"), but it never came together. The movie would go from one scene to the other, without any real transitioning. Therefore, it can leave one a bit confused. You may find yourself asking yourself, "How did we get here?" Even the ending some abruptly.
It appears to be a low budget film, so I get the notion "you get what you pay for," but the acting in this is seriously bad. I am trying to figure how they got Dee Wallace to be in this.
I saw this rated as a horror movie, but I don't see any element of a horror movie. I do not think a movie has to be gory to be a horror movie, but it has nothing: no gore, no spiritual warfare, no conjuring, no demons or witchcraft, nothing. I do not know what I was watching.
Along with the credits at the end, they should also issue an apology to anyone who watched it.
It appears to be a low budget film, so I get the notion "you get what you pay for," but the acting in this is seriously bad. I am trying to figure how they got Dee Wallace to be in this.
I saw this rated as a horror movie, but I don't see any element of a horror movie. I do not think a movie has to be gory to be a horror movie, but it has nothing: no gore, no spiritual warfare, no conjuring, no demons or witchcraft, nothing. I do not know what I was watching.
Along with the credits at the end, they should also issue an apology to anyone who watched it.
I watch an hour of this film which I will never get back. The cover makes it look like an Insidious type title. I expected some horror but it was dull and uninspiring. In the hour I watched next to nothing happened except some weird sex scene. I wanted so much more but it didn't deliver.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesDirector Elias Argentiere and stars Sarah Schoofs and Nicholas Wilder previously worked together on the movie Paranoia - Der Killer in Dir! (2012).
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is Ayla?Powered by Alexa
Details
Box Office
- Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
- 13.010.729 $
- Laufzeit
- 1 Std. 26 Min.(86 min)
- Farbe
- Seitenverhältnis
- 2.00 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen