Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuWhen two software entrepreneurs develop a method of extracting memories, one comes to regard their discovery as a Frankenstein monster that must be destroyed, and finds himself at odds with ... Alles lesenWhen two software entrepreneurs develop a method of extracting memories, one comes to regard their discovery as a Frankenstein monster that must be destroyed, and finds himself at odds with dangerous forces.When two software entrepreneurs develop a method of extracting memories, one comes to regard their discovery as a Frankenstein monster that must be destroyed, and finds himself at odds with dangerous forces.
Empfohlene Bewertungen
The only way to approach independent movies is with a healthy dose of forgiveness. But, maybe due to technology, the basic level of proficiency has made many super watchable.
The picture wastes no time getting into the story, avoiding the weak beginning endemic to many self made projects. Richard and Bill are working on a technology that can record memories and allow them to be "re-experienced". Richard's wife Hadley is the guinea pig.
Bill is established as an anti-social, anti-technology genius reluctant to share the code even with his business partner. Richard is an angry, controlling brute, establishing the conflict.
We mostly follow Bill, who is confused, though not as much as his father who has dementia. A session with a therapist establishes Bill lost a wife and child in an accident he has trouble remembering. This plus his déjà vu and persecution complex might be what lead him to fear the memory technology, leading to an affair with Hadley and a confrontation with Richard.
The performances are serviceable, though the story arcs are not involved - characters intensify rather than change. Still, no one does anything stupid or unbelievable to forward the plot. The main flaw is a lack of tight editing which most indies contend with. The scenes of Bill's confusion with reality could easily be cut in half. The ending meets the ideal of being both surprising yet inevitable. If Hitchcock had done science fiction, this is the kind of ending he would have adored.
If this was truly done on $5,000, it's a brilliant job.
I've been trying to find online sources discussing this movie but have come up with nothing. For me this is a no budget indie mindbending sci fi gem that nobody watches, let alone reviews or discusses.
Panopticons budget was most likely next to nothing and it appears as if what little they had was all blown on production with nothing at all left for marketing. In 2018 they should at least have come up with some online social media campaign but it looks like they just made it and then wandered off to do something else leaving the movie to be viewed by next to nobody.
Panopticon tells the story of two software entreprenuers working on a method of downloading memories. One is the actual software engineer and the other takes care of more of the business side of things looking for financiers and investors whose girlfriend is also used as the first guinea pig. The software engineers father is a dementia patient and this dynamic gives a good outlook on the effects of real world memory loss and as someone with a mother suffering from advanced dementia, I can relate.
A power struggle unsues when the software engineer sees the potential for misuse of their product while the other partner is seeing the potential for millions of dollars in investment.
I wont give any spoilers away but if you're into mindbending movies that are abit 'out there', definitely pretty trippy and can forgive the obvious low budget then this movie really does deserve a look.
Definitely not to everyones taste though, but if you're into more black mirror'esque sci fi this just may be for you.
Panopticons budget was most likely next to nothing and it appears as if what little they had was all blown on production with nothing at all left for marketing. In 2018 they should at least have come up with some online social media campaign but it looks like they just made it and then wandered off to do something else leaving the movie to be viewed by next to nobody.
Panopticon tells the story of two software entreprenuers working on a method of downloading memories. One is the actual software engineer and the other takes care of more of the business side of things looking for financiers and investors whose girlfriend is also used as the first guinea pig. The software engineers father is a dementia patient and this dynamic gives a good outlook on the effects of real world memory loss and as someone with a mother suffering from advanced dementia, I can relate.
A power struggle unsues when the software engineer sees the potential for misuse of their product while the other partner is seeing the potential for millions of dollars in investment.
I wont give any spoilers away but if you're into mindbending movies that are abit 'out there', definitely pretty trippy and can forgive the obvious low budget then this movie really does deserve a look.
Definitely not to everyones taste though, but if you're into more black mirror'esque sci fi this just may be for you.
I'm not a big fan of indie movies, but this one brought me in and intrigued me. The production (especially on a no budget) was remarkable! The acting was excellent and the story kept giving us turns.
Well done!
Acting was decent for a low budget flick. The movie had some great ideas, but they're not fully developed at all. Instead, we see the hint of some of those ideas repeatedly given over and over. Nauseatingly so.
Editing is a severe problem in the movie. The vast majority of it could have been excised and it would have been a far better movie. As it stands, it is best watched on fast forward with some parts skipped entirely.
I have this movie 4 stars because of the hints I mentioned above. I honestly don't understand why the director didn't develop any of those ideas. Some could have easily been done on the cheap.
I would recommend this movie for people who are looking for science fiction ideas to develop; for those who love literal science fiction (and don't mind having to fast forward), and low budget directors looking too see how others have done it.
People wanting action sci-fi, big budget flicks, or cohesive/well scripted movies... give this one a pass
People wanting action sci-fi, big budget flicks, or cohesive/well scripted movies... give this one a pass
Bill (the lead character) has got to be the worst actor I've had the misfortune to watch. He just walks around as if he's spaced out. The lights are on but no one home. The lead woman is equally as bad. How they both get work is beyond me. There are so many unacceptable breaks in dialogue (dead air) if the actors were up to it maybe , but the fact it had little budget doesn't impress me as it's so bad it shouldn't have been made in the first place.
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
Details
- Herkunftsland
- Offizielle Standorte
- Sprache
- Drehorte
- Produktionsfirma
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
Box Office
- Budget
- 5.000 $ (geschätzt)
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen