I've elaborated on my initial reaction, in case anyone's interested.
(view spoiler)[I’ve had a weekend to think and an afternoon to set things down in my journal, so I’m going to try to give a slightly more detailed (and, hopefully, more coherent) account of my reactions to The Unholy Consult.
But first, I found the citation I mentioned below about the unreliability of revelation: “All heaven cannot shine through a single crack” – Protathis, the moI've elaborated on my initial reaction, in case anyone's interested.
(view spoiler)[I’ve had a weekend to think and an afternoon to set things down in my journal, so I’m going to try to give a slightly more detailed (and, hopefully, more coherent) account of my reactions to The Unholy Consult.
But first, I found the citation I mentioned below about the unreliability of revelation: “All heaven cannot shine through a single crack” – Protathis, the most famous Ketyai poet in the Three Seas.
As I mentioned in the original review, it’s a bit frustrating that there is still no resolution to the Second Apocalypse, and we’re left hanging with Kellhus dead, the Ordeal obliterated and the No-God reborn. That there is any hope at all lies in the survival of Akka, Esmi and Mimara, along with her son, the last child born alive before Mog Pharau’s resurrection. Moënghus’ continued existence as the new Scylvendi leader. And, I hope – I very much hope – in Serwa’s survival, the last person capable of handling Metagnostic Cants.
There are some answers given to prosaic questions such as the early history of the Consult and its fate – subsumed by the Dunyain (captives from Ishuäl). We discover that Kellhus went to the Outside to bring a “reverse revelation” to the gods and made a deal with (?), was subsumed by (?), agreed to host (?) the trickster god Ajokli, who manifested at the final confrontation. (There’s an interesting citation in the “Decapitants” entry in the glossary about a drover coming upon Kellhus in the desert, raving and replacing his head with one of the Decapitants’. Possibly communing with Ajokli?) And, though it’s been implied more than explicit, we definitively learn that Anasûrimbor souls are invisible to the gods, as Kelmomas is able to sneak into the Golden Room unnoticed. (It’s a bit of a mystery how he gets there since we last left him chained in a tent and there’s a Horde, an Ordeal and a Wracu in his way, but perhaps we’ll learn in subsequent books.)
Bakker continues to write one of the most interesting SF series I’ve come across in a long time. It fits perfectly with my own nonfiction explorations of consciousness, meaning, religion, etc., and I doubt he’ll definitively answer any of those questions. The objective evidence paints a bleak picture – humans are really, really not the center of the universe. We hardly qualify as pond scum. Our existence, our beliefs are contingent and not guaranteed. We stumble along with only the vaguest perception of Reality, ruled by the darkness that comes before, and appear to have survived by luck more than anything else.
Yet…what is one to make of the Judging Eye and the notions of salvation and damnation? If the God is so far beyond human comprehension and doesn't give a fig about individuals (as Kellhus tells Proyas), why should a soul’s moral state matter? What is one to make of things like the Heron Spear falling into the hands of someone capable of using it in the First Apocalypse? Was there more than chance that prompted Esmi to leave that file for Kelmomas to break his bonds? No one – not Men, not Dunyain, not Nonmen, not Inchoroi, not even the Gods – really grasps the totality of Reality, and that’s the only hope Mankind and the reader have for a relatively upbeat ending to this tale.
There’s an interesting passage concerning the Tekne and its role in the Inchoroi’s downfall that can be read as a cautionary tale about our civilization’s obsession with technology and all it can do:
“’The progenitors called it the Illumination,’ the unscathed Dunyain said…. ‘The age that saw the Tekne become their faith, the idol they raised above all others. They turned their back on their old Gods, their old temples, and raised new ones, great houses dedicated to unravelling the wellsprings of existence. Cause [emphasis mine] became their one and only God.’
But what is sunlight to a mole? In their curious, collective manner the Mutilated told how the Tekne so transformed the problems faced by the progenitors that all the old ways become impossible. It raised them from their traditions, struck the shackles of custom from their intellects, until only their common animality constrained them. They worshipped themselves as the measure of all significance, gave themselves over to wanton gluttony. Nothing was forbidden them, short the obstruction of others and their desires. Justice became the calculation of competing appetites. Logos became the principle of their entire civilization.
‘By imperceptible increments…the Tekne unfettered their desires, allowed them to plumb ever deeper perversions…. They began moulding themselves the way potters mould clay.’
The Tekne and the transformation wrought by its bottomless potency….
How, in relieving the Inchoroi of want and deprivation, it had stripped them of everything sacred…. ‘There was only one riddle they could not solve…. The soul….
‘And when the soul at last yielded its secrets to their scrutiny…. They discovered their entire race damned.’” (pp. 391-3)
There’s yet another interesting tidbit where we learn that the Ark was an artificial intelligence (it’s implied that it’s dead) of which the Inchoroi were but components to be used and manipulated. Aurang and Aurax were as much Weapons as the Sranc, Bashrag and Wracu. Which brought to mind Harari’s Home Deus, which I recently finished, where he paints a possible future where humans are in danger of becoming the very same. _____________________________________________
Five stars – The Prince of Nothing and The Aspect-Emperor series are brilliant and I can’t recommend them enough. Even if The Unholy Consult left me hanging, and I have to wait for at least two more books before the fate of Eärwa is determined.
There’s so much that could be discussed that I’ve been having trouble organizing my thoughts; I’ll start down one trail and find myself wandering off into the brush. Suffice it to say that Bakker leaves you wondering “what the hell!” And I think that’s deliberate. All along the theme of Man’s inability to grasp Reality has predominated, and now we come to understand that even the Dunyain and the Inchoroi are nearly as hapless. The universe is simply too vast for a finite mind to comprehend, even the fragments of the God of Gods whom Men worship. There’s even a quote I remember from “The Encyclopaedic Glossary” to that effect but I can’t find it now; I’m 90% sure it’s not Ajencis but I can’t remember who said it.
Some random thoughts: • Where The Prince of Nothing was, structurally, a retelling of Steven Runciman’s History of the Crusades and The Judging Eye paid homage to the Fellowship’s journey through Moria, in The Unholy Consult, Bakker is harking back to that foundational epic of Western Civ, the Iliad.
• I never thought I would feel any sympathy for that homicidal little sociopath Kelmomas but – Holy God! – what Bakker does to that poor bastard is truly diabolic.
• Does Serwa survive? The last we see of her is Kayûtas carrying her body out of the Intrinsic Gate but she survived the particle-beam lance and she is half-Dunyain. And if anyone can survive the Horde’s overwhelming of the Ordeal, it would be Kayûtas, even burdened with his sister’s body.
• Speaking of which, what’s Kellhus’ grandson up to? The last time we saw him, he was busy murdering Scylvendi scouts.
• Do the Scylvendi have the Heron Spear (it disappeared in their sack of Cenei in 3351) and will Moënghus be the man who saves the day by killing the No-God?
• If the God of Gods doesn’t care about humans (as Kellhus tells Proyas), why are our souls judged at all? And what is the Judging Eye, then? (I doubt Bakker will answer these questions even if he does bring the series to a definitive end.) (hide spoiler)]...more
TERENCE’S
2025
BOOKS
it was amazing
really liked it
liked it
really liked it
liked it
really liked it
liked it
really liked it
liked it
really liked it
it was amazing
Terence’s last review of the year
6.5 out of 10
Welcome back. Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account.