Key research themes
1. How can archaeological data production and legacy data use be re-conceptualized to improve evidential reasoning and data utility in archaeological science?
This research theme focuses on refining archaeological methodologies and conceptual frameworks to better understand the socio-technical processes of data production ('choreographies') and effectively utilize legacy or previously collected archaeological data. It emphasizes overcoming epistemic challenges about data reliability, interpretation biases, and reusability by examining physical, mental, and conceptual practices in data creation and developing strategies to recontextualize and redeploy old datasets using computational and experimental approaches. These insights are crucial to advancing archaeological science, ensuring continuous knowledge production despite fragmentary and historically contingent datasets.
2. What are the current methodological innovations and comparative frameworks enhancing archaeological data collection and interpretation?
This research area investigates the methodological advancements improving archaeological data acquisition and interpretation, including geophysical techniques, ethnoarchaeology, and cross-cultural comparative strategies. It addresses the integration of scientific instruments like ground-penetrating radar (GPR), drone-based surveys, and computational tools; the application of ethnographic analogies; and the systematic comparative analysis of archaeological and ethnographic records to establish behavioral, cultural, and temporal patterns. These approaches enrich archaeological inference by combining empirical data and interpretive frameworks bridging human behavior, environmental interactions, and technological capabilities.
3. How do theoretical approaches and critical reflections shape contemporary archaeological science and its integration with broader social and scientific concerns?
This theme explores the dialogue between archaeological theory and scientific practice, addressing the evolving role of archaeological science in theoretical frameworks, the historical and philosophical critiques influencing methodological choices, and emerging interdisciplinary engagements. It reflects on post-processual and processual debates, the embedding of Marxist and other critical perspectives, and the social relevance of archaeology especially regarding sustainability, heritage management, and addressing contemporary challenges. These reflections aim to frame archaeological science not only as a set of techniques but also as an epistemologically and socially situated practice.