Posts Tagged ‘reviews’


The seed of evil has been planted …

What will happen when its roots take hold?

Ékleipsis: The Abyss is the second short story collection by the award-winning author.

Tales of depravation and insanity are woven together with unrelenting style and depth, scrutinizing human nature’s degeneration when compromised by tragic, vicious circumstances.

These complex, wretched individuals and the irremediable conditions they are desperate to claw out of—or into—invoke the unfathomable question: What devastation are we truly capable of when left with no way out but down . . . into the obscurity of the abyss?

* * * *

For many reasons, I don’t usually accept review requests these days. One of those reasons is that I like to be both honest and kind, and it can be hard to reconcile those two values if the book is not well written.

I’m glad I accepted this request, though.  Supernatural horror is usually my bag, whereas these stories are firmly grounded in the real world, which in Wino’s capable hands made them all the more terrifying. A common thread runs through the stories, yet each one is different enough to maintain the reader’s interest. Each story starts on familiar ground, at times steering close to cliché. Then the tension builds. And builds. And builds. And soon the reader finds themselves in a dark, dangerous, and unexpected place.

Wino writes in an accessible style. He develops his characters with the efficiency that only a skilled short story writer can master, some with such nuance that one can’t quite be sure who is the victim, who is the villain, and who is the hero. My favourite story was “En Prise”, in which an ordinary woman plays an extraordinary mind game to save herself from a man who might be a serial killer.


Amazon has recently been deleting book reviews from their site in large numbers, and the indie author community is NOT happy. Google “Amazon removes reviews” and you’ll get over 5 million results, but if you go to this post from Karen Woodward, you’ll get a decent synopsis of the issue, plus several other relevant links.

The general consensus of opinion seems to be:

  • Amazon is a business, so they can do whatever they like as long as it’s not illegal.
  • Just because they can, doesn’t mean they should.

By Elke Wetzig (elya) (Own work) [GFDL (http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html), CC-BY-SA-3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/) or CC-BY-SA-2.5-2.0-1.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5-2.0-1.0)], via Wikimedia Commons

Would you trust a review from these puppets?

It all started because of sock-puppetry. Some authors were trying to ‘game’ the system by creating false Amazon profiles and posting multiple reviews of their own books and/or posting malicious 1-star reviews of  their rivals’ books.  Amazon response to the outrage was the equivalent of keeping in the entire class after school because three kids at the back were passing notes, which according to Joe Konrath casts many indie authors in the role of the tell-tale kid at the front.

The reviews on “Ghosts Can Bleed” are intact – for the moment – but around half of the reviews I’ve written have disappeared. Given that my author profile is linked to my Amazon account and authors are now no longer allowed to review “competing products” (the definition of which is hopelessly vague), it’s possible that the other half could disappear at any time, and my reviewing ‘privileges’ could be revoked.

You’ll note the quotation marks around ‘privileges’. You see, while the rest of the indie community is hopping mad at what they see as Amazon’s poorly handled response to the problem of fake reviews, I’m going, “Meh.”

I love my fellow indie authors, I really do, and I will do whatever I can to help them out, including reading and reviewing their books. But the thing is, all that reading and reviewing takes a lot of time, which in turn has a significant impact on my own writing productivity. Sometimes I get compassion fatigue, and feel like I will lose it if I get one more review request (and no, I will not even consider reviewing a book unless I have read it from cover to cover, so put that idea right out of your head). Not being allowed to review other writers’ books lets me off the hook to a large extent.  Sure, I can still post reviews on my blog or on Goodreads, but nobody cares about that; everything revolves around Amazon. And perhaps there is a lesson in that.  Perhaps we all need to pay less attention to Amazon, thereby reducing Amazon’s power and dominance in the ebook market.

I’m unconcerned about losing reviews of my own books, because everyone is losing reviews, which keeps us all on a level playing field. Yes, that’s cold comfort to indies trying to compete with the likes of J.K. Rowling, Stephen King and other megastars with thousands of reviews per title, but then, it’s an exercise in futility trying to compete with them anyway, reviews or no reviews.

So go ahead, Amazon, delete my reviews.  See if I care.

 


Yes, folks, it’s another blog round-up.  This month is proving to be a really tough one personally, so bear with me while I avoid writing any original new content (guest posts particularly welcome right now).

#

By Spaicecowboi (Own work) [CC-BY-SA-3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0)], via Wikimedia CommonsAustralians love to win races, and get all pouty and sulky if they don’t.  But like Dan Haesler, I’m nowhere near convinced that competing in the Education Race against China is a desirable thing.
http://danhaesler.com/2012/09/03/how-australia-can-win-the-education-race/

Stephen Hise tells us how to decipher what those glowing Amazon reviews really mean.
http://www.indiesunlimited.com/2012/09/06/breaking-the-code/#more-25161

You know you’ve annoyed Nerine Dorman when she is forced to say ‘shit’ eight times in one blog post.
http://nerinedorman.blogspot.com.au/2012/09/beware-of-editor-she-bites.html

A scholarly analysis of gender roles in zombie fiction.  Yes, I said “scholarly” and “zombie” in the same sentence.By iluvrhinestones from seattle, oceania, upload by Herrick (rampant) [CC-BY-SA-2.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0)], via Wikimedia Commons
http://genderandgenre.wordpress.com/2012/09/18/theres-only-three-of-us-the-women-of-the-zombie-apocalypse/

Congratulations to Pierre Mare for his first story accepted for publication.  I’ve read a lot of zombie fiction, and this one I can honestly say offers something different from the standard fare.
http://www.talesofworldwarz.com/stories/2012/09/20/first-time-by-pierre-mare/