…on symmetry and squarks
TO: Nadja Strobbe, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
FM: Bruce E. Camber
RE: Your many articles, especially within SciTechDaily and ArXiv, especially the Search for top squarks in final states (Feb. 2021), your homepage(s) including Supercomputer Institute and the CMS Collaboration at CERN, Fermilab, Expert (School of Physics and Astronomy) and personal site.
More: https://81018.com/strobbe/ including “Breaking Physics: The Radical Search for the Universe’s Missing Pieces,” Shannon Brescher Shea, U.S. Department of Energy, January 15, 2024
Third email: 26 December 2025
Dear Prof. Dr. Nadja Strobbe:
A fascinating starting point to define symmetry is SU(2) and SU(3). SU(5) maximizes symmetries. Have you considered the work done in this area within your research? Thank you.
Most sincerely,
Bruce
Links: https://81018.com/notations-0-24/#Symmetry
https://81018.com/gauge-symmetries/#Symmetry
Second email: 14 February 2024 @ 7:36 AM (updated)
Dear Prof. Dr. Nadja Strobbe:
We struggle with keeping it simple, yet complete enough to be understood. Symmetry is one of those words and functions that requires special thought. If the functional analysis is not followed back to the scale-invariant sphere, I believe that analysis is incomplete.
I’ll continue struggling to make my analysis of starting points – https://81018.com/bbc/ – as intelligible as I can. I apologize for my shortcomings. Thank you.
Warmly,
Bruce
First email: Tuesday, 13 February 2024 @ 3:36 PM (updated)
Dear Prof. Dr. Nadja Strobbe:
We were introduced to squarks (and gluinos) by Mansoora Shamim of CERN, Oregon, and Kansas. More than looking for a top squark, perhaps a rather dramatic re-orientation to the problems is needed.
In considering physics Beyond the Standard Model, it seems that most scholars do not question the big bang. Yet, if we were to apply base-2 notation at the Planck scale, the universe can be mapped in 202 notations and those notations seem to support the Standard Models and LambdaCDM as well, if not better than the assumptions within big bang cosmology.
I open the discussions here: https://81018.com/bbc/
If you could have a quick look and comment, I would be delighted and entirely indebted.
Thank you.
Warmly,
Bruce
________________
Bruce E. Camber