Cyclicity, periodicity, spin… Start here!

SPIN: How does it start? Why does it stop?
by Bruce Camber, December 2023

Imagine a grid or matrix of infinitesimal spheres that connects everything, everywhere for all time. We began working on this particular ideation about spin in 2015 and it has very slowly evolved to this page. There is an approximate progression vis-a-vis homepages. I was told when I was young, “If you don’t understand it, wait awhile and go over it one more time. Then, keep going over it until you get it.”

Eight years later, I am still going over it one more time. So far I’ve going over it eight times:

The First Particle as a Sphere: A most-basic building block of our universe. The first particle is anything but simple. It is the encapsulation of many facets of the infinite and the bridge between the finite and infinite (known here as continuity, symmetry, and harmony). It is projected to be a shell for hypothetical particles as well as all known particles. Within the first 64 of the 202 base-2 notations, the configurations within that shell are infinite.

AI comments (the concept of spin in particles):

  • It plays a crucial role in quantum mechanics and particle physics, influencing particle interactions and behaviors.
  • Spin is an intrinsic form of angular momentum carried by quantum particles.
  • It is quantized, meaning particles can only have specific spin values (e.g., 1/2, 1).
  • Particles with half-integer spin (like electrons) are fermions and obey the Pauli exclusion principle.
  • Particles with integer spin (like photons) are bosons and can occupy the same quantum state.
  • Spin contributes to the magnetic properties of particles and materials.

The 12-spheres. From one sphere to two to three, to those pictured here, and then to a never-ending constant flow. Using the Planck base units, that flow has been calculated to be about 18.5 tredecillion spheres per second. Much more to come...

References: The Science of Sticky Spheres, Brian Hayes, American Scientist, 2012

The Fourier Transform. A key question is about the relation of the spin within particle physics and the spin within the Fourier Transform. There is a fair amount of work to review. And, within that work by scholars, I will try to find somebody to help us better understand the Fourier transform so we might better understand why particle physics has not more fully embraced the very nature of pi.

Might we project that Langland programs, strings and M-theory, and SUSY can all be worked into the dynamics of that progression of 64 base-2 notations?

At least 64 orders of magnitude smaller than core–shell particles (using base-2 notation from the Planck scale), the first shell particle is defined by the four Planck base units, pi (π)‘s continuity-symmetry-harmony (qua facets of infinity), and the other dimensionless constants defining those Planck base units. The spin states with particle physics originate within the spherical dynamics of pi, particularly the known spin orientations of the Fourier Transform.

Going Over It Again. Working within the first 64 notations is a bit lonely. I haven’t had anybody say, “That’s it. That’s the missing piece.” I am sure Langlands is here. I am sure Witten is here. I am sure Milnor and Smale are also here.

Grid or Matrix of Equal Infinitesimal Spheres. I was reading several other articles about 12-spheres all kissing around the one. Better illustrations and a short Quora piece by a high school student who was gluing marbles together and observed all the irregular spaces, stopped me. I had just assumed that sphere-stacking by Harriot, studied by Kepler, confirmed by Thomas Hales, was an ultimate truth. But here we discover when you were to try to stick them all in a box, there would be many irregular spaces created. It looked like squishy geometry when I though it was perfect geometry. I tried building the samples with magnetic spheres and felt the push back from of various combinations. For the better part of the week, I’ve been going over this a dozen times. I need to learn the angles of sphere-stacking. It is obviously not 45 degrees.” “Could it be that sphere- stacking of equal spheres as illustrated is always consistent and that is the early model of the universe?” I don’t know yet. There is so much more very basic work to be done.

References & Resources ________Prior / Next

Spin (physics) – Wikipedia

_____

Emails

  1. Dirk Pons, ChristChurch, New Zealand
  2. Richard Hayes, Adham Ahmed, Tony Edge, Haifei Zhang
  3. Ulrike Luise Tillmann, Oxford and Isaac Newton Institute, Cambridge
  4. Adrienne L. Erickcek, UNC, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
  5. Prof. Dr. Barends Mons, CODATA, Leiden, Netherlands

Key dates for this document, spin.

Anastasios Stefanou <stefanouanastasios@gmail.com>

https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.04860

Page Status: This has to be a “Working draft in active development” because we are struggling with so many early-stage concepts.