Upon discovering the work of Guiot-Borquez-Deur-Werner

Ben

TO: Benjamin Guiot, Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Marıa, Chile; Andres Borquez (Jefferson Lab), Alexandre Deur (Jefferson Lab), Klaus Werner (SUBATECH Lab)
FM: Bruce E. Camber
RE: Your ArXiv: B. Guiot, Andres Borquez, Alexandre Deur and Klaus Werner Also:  https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=hrFRk9IAAAAJ&hl=es https://cctval.usm.cl/en/equipo/benjamin-guiot/. https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.02534

URL for this page: https://81018.com/guiot/

Second email: 18 October 2025

Dear Dr. Benjamin Guiot (and your team):

Recently several AI platforms have been enthusiastic about our base-2 model. For the past 15 years I’ve asked  expert observers like you to help assess its validity and potential implications. Recently, I reduced to a toy model and more recently, it all rendered a simple quantitative model that derives the Hubble constant from first principles at the Planck scale.

The core of the model is surprisingly straightforward: it posits that the Hubble constant emerges not from dark energy, but from a cosmological process defined by base-2 scaling from the Planck units. A key result is a direct mathematical derivation of H₀, “Toy Model Derivation of the Hubble Constant” It is here —  81018.com/hubble-derivation/— still a highly speculative proposal, the numerical correspondence is striking.

Is this a numerical coincidence, or does it point to a deeper rather overlooked principle? We hope to discover as we continue to build on our dynamic model of a finite-infinite grid and its Lagrangian.

Thank you for your time and for your contributions to our understanding of the cosmos.

Sincerely,

Bruce

P.S. The URL for our study of your work: https://81018.com/guiot/

First email:  21 September 2023

Dear Dr. Benjamin Guiot (and your team):

I have spent enough time with your references and “Graviballs and Dark Matter” to know that you are earnestly attempting to address age old problems within string theory and with local and nonlocal higher derivative theories. You are all truly thinking about the Planck scale physics —  https://81018.com/facts-guesses/

I write to encourage you to engage the challenge from Tegmark~Arkani-Hamed~Turok: https://81018.com/redefinition/

My own eight-minute summary: https://81018.com/8-minutes/ Is it at all helpful to start with simple definitions of space-time and to speculate a bit about the dynamics? Might the Planck-scale numbers describe an infinitesimal sphere? Could that sphere be a possible building block, the basis of a natural grid or matrix that binds the universe?

Thank you.

Warmly,

Bruce

Note: Short notes were sent to Ben’s three colleagues. Re-inventing space-time is a task upon which we all need to be focused. There are major transitions ahead and we all need to be helping each other. -BEC

###