Beat back by German troops to the French port city of
Dunkirk, hundreds of thousands of Allied troops wait in desperation for an
unlikely deliverance. Over the course of this harrowing week, we witness a
French soldier trying to smuggle his way onto a fleeting British carrier, a
dogfight between RAF and Luftwaffe pilots, and a civilian and his sons
answering their country’s call to aid in the evacuation. Christopher Nolan’s most
solemn and serious movie to date is a visually arresting, fluid, even balletic experience
told with minimal dialogue and the aid of fine performances including Kenneth
Branagh, Mark Rylance, Cillian Murphy, and Tom Hardy. The movie does reach a
problem area however when the panoply of the filmmaking itself starts to take
precedence over the actual events it is depicting.
*** ½ out of ****
A blog dealing with either the joy of cinema or the agony of cinema--nothing in between.
Showing posts with label Christopher Nolan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Christopher Nolan. Show all posts
Monday, July 31, 2017
Saturday, November 22, 2014
Interstellar
As a modern day Dust Bowl threatens to starve and suffocate the human race, an ex-fighter pilot, first-rate engineer, and discontented farmer (Matthew McConaughey) stumbles upon and is swiftly commissioned to lead a deadly, top secret NASA mission that aims to journey through a wormhole in search of a new home for the species. Christopher Nolan's Interstellar plays as intriguing science fiction and a palpable family drama for roughly half its running time before succumbing to constant and inane scientific conjecture, egregiously overt references to 2001, and its sheer length which could have easily been pared down. McConaughey is strong, Anne Hathaway is mercifully dialed down, and several late arriving big named cameos serve merely as distractions.
** 1/2 out of ****
** 1/2 out of ****
Tuesday, July 17, 2012
The Dark Knight Rises
Okay. Where to begin? "The Dark Knight" would be a
tough act for anyone to follow and Christopher Nolan's final installment in his
Batman trilogy isn't a disappointment in the traditional way we think of.
Basically, there are only a few ways to follow such a quantifiable success such
as TDK and they are make a lesser movie, make an original movie, or make a
balls out, relentlessly assaultive, nonstop, over-the-top, epic length blockbuster that
barely lets you breathe. You can probably guess which one the filmmakers opted
for. Working with his brother Jonathan and David S. Goyer, the same team that
developed the first two films, Nolan delivers a spectacular film with a less
than inspired script. Now following eight years of relative harmony in Gotham,
Batman is still playing the fall guy for Harvey Dent's crimes while living in
seclusion at Wayne
manor. Now, the League of Shadows sense the time is ripe to hatch chaos and
destruction, sending the brutal Bane (Tom Hardy) and his gang of miscreants
(seemingly lifted from the Occupy Gotham movement) to get the job done. Meanwhile
Gordon is injured on the job, one of his intuitive young detectives (Joseph
Gordon-Levitt) takes some initiative, a humanist (Marion Cotillard) becomes
involved in a massive environmental deal with Wayne Enterprises, and Catwoman
(Anne Hathaway) shows her claws. Again, Christian Bale plays a diminutive role
and even during the overlong running time of the film, it seems like we hardly
see him on screen. Michael Caine and Morgan Freeman return adding very little
to the table this time around as they troubleshoot and offer cautionary advice.
An unrecognizable and largely incomprehensible Hardy is appropriately menacing,
but hardly fills the large shoes left by Heath Ledger. There are also major
problems with the two major female additions to the cast. Both of their
relationships to Wayne
are poorly realized and nonsensical, and as for Hathaway, I still cannot
understand how someone can be so good at parts and so off-puttingly horrendous
at others, and her wild inconsistencies greatly affect the film. Also, a major plot twist towards the end of the picture qualifies as both lame and cheating. Another point
is how well things wrap up in the finale, only for the filmmakers to cop out
and offer a patted, sequel promising ending. Don't get me wrong, there are some
really fine set pieces here, and I think I was the only one in the theater who
wasn't whooping when THE DARK KNIGHT RISES finally flashed on the screen at the
conclusion. During the proceedings though, as was the case with
"Inception", I again felt like Alex from "A Clockwork
Orange" with my eyes bolstered open as I was bombarded by endless amounts
of sound and fury for nearly three hours.
Tuesday, July 13, 2010
Inception
George Carlin once said that there is nothing more boring than listening to someone describe their own dream, and I would add that there is no movie more boring than an overblown dream film with no basis in reality. Inception arrives in theaters holding the biggest expectations of the summer, and disappoints fantastically on every level. The problem with following up a spectacular hit like The Dark Knight is the tendency to outdo yourself at every turn, which Christopher Nolan does here. At every turn.
Inception is Nolan’s 7th feature film, one of the few that he did not collaborate on with his brother Jonathon, and the first that, in addition to not being called great, can be referred to as a downright stinker. The problem lies not in the production value or action sequences, which are all top notch. The problem has to do with the plot, which takes place in what may or may not be a multilayered dream, that is unable to generate any tension. Because everything takes place in a dream, even the most climatic scenes fail to generate any tension, although the filmmakers due all they can to try to do so.
The “plot” revolves around a con man named Cobb (Leonardo DiCaprio), who with his partner (Joseph Gordon-Levitt), enter peoples dreams, gain their trust, and get them to reveal their darkest secrets. When a mark (Ken Watanabe) decides to hire them to pull of the ultimate heist, they hire a dream architect (Ellen “Juno” Page), a muscle guy, and a dream inducer they are ready to go. That is until elements of Cobb’s reality begin to interfere with the dreams he enters. If that synopsis doesn’t sound ludicrous, trust me it gets worse.
All directors fail. Spielberg had 1941, Coppola had Godfather III, and Shyamalan has had every movie since The Sixth Sense. Its not that Nolan has failed here, it’s the fact that he failed so poorly when the expectations were so high. That is not to say that no one will take enjoyment in the film. In fact the crowd roared when the credits began and many were abuzz in the lobby as they discussed plot points. As this movie will sure to please fanboys and action junkies, it will come across as a nightmare for anyone with any expectations at all.
Sunday, May 16, 2010
Memento
Memento is the story of a man who can form no new memories and is looking for the man who murdered his wife and caused this condition, and in many ways our own memories are tested in this film by the way it is structured. The 2000 film by Christopher Nolan is filmed in both black and white, and in color, shown interchangeably. The B&W sequences show the protagonist (Guy Pearce) in his hotel room, covered in tattoos, gathering evidence, and explaining the situation he is in. The color scenes start from 10 minutes before the end of the story and will then keep jumping ten minutes back until they reach the beginning of the story when it will meet up with the B&W sequences. This film was beloved when it was released and continues to have a cult following. It is certainly engaging, but at this point I see the film as somewhat gimmicky and even distracting at points. Still it is somewhat brilliant in its construction and the payoff is a knockout.
***1/2 out of ****
Sunday, April 4, 2010
Following
Following is director Christopher Nolan's feature film debut (though it barely qualifies as one with its 70 minute length) and his talent is evident even in the beginning. Shot on a shoestring budget in black and white, it tells the story of a lonely young man with a strange hobby. He follows, or shadows people as he calls it with no insidious intentions, just for the thrill of it. One day he is caught by one of his targets, a man of similar mind but with darker intentions, and he is soon involved in a burglary scheme. The chronology of the plot is disjointed, a similar technique Nolan would later apply in Memento, and the viewer if forced to think back on the plot. Though Following is more of a cinematic exercise than it is a fully fleshed out feature length film, it is a fun and short escape and a record of a young directorial master at work.
***1/2
***1/2
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)